Cited by 83High Entropy Alloys StudiesPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismSuperconducting Materials and Applications

Superconductivity in equimolar Nb-Re-Hf-Zr-Ti high entropy alloy

Open access
Marik, Sourav, Varghese, Maneesha, Sajilesh, K.P., Singh, Deepak, Singh, R.P.·2018·Journal of Alloys and Compounds

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.08.039

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BCC-type HEA superconductors with VECs of 4.8 or more have been reported for (TiZrNbTa)1-xWx, Nb20Re20Zr20Hf20Ti20, NbTaTiZrFe, TiHfNbTaMo, and Ti-Hf-Nb-Ta-Re systems.

    “BCC-type HEA superconductors with VECs of 4.8 or more have been reported for (TiZrNbTa)1x W x 30 , Nb20Re20Zr20Hf20Ti20 19 , NbTaTiZrFe 31 , TiHfNbTaMo 23 , and Ti-Hf-Nb-Ta-Re systems 25 .”

    From Recent advances in high-entropy superconductors (2024) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Experimental Details identify Nb20Re20Zr20Hf20Ti20 as the nominal composition, and the Results and Discussion report a bcc structure and superconductivity for the resulting sample. Our copy does not state a VEC of 4.8 or more; it also reports a measured composition of Nb21Re16Zr20Hf23Ti20 rather than the nominal equimolar composition. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. J. W. Yeh, S. K. Chen, S. J. Lin, J. Y. Gan, T. S. Chin, T. T. Shun, C. H. Tsau, and S. Y. Chang, Adv. Eng. Mater. 6, 299 (2004).
  2. Y. F. Ye, Q. Wang, J. Lu, C. T. Liu, and Y. Yang, Mater. Today 19, 349 (2016).
  3. J. W. Yeh, JOM 65,1759 (2013).
  4. O. N. Senkov, J. D. Miller, D. B. Miracle, and C. Wood- ward, Nat. Commun. 6, 6529 (2015).
  5. M. H. Tsai, and J. W. Yeh, Mater. Res. Lett. 2, 107 (2014).
  6. Y. Zou, H. Ma, and R. Spolenak, Nat. Commun. 6, 7748 (2015).
  7. Y. J. Zhou, Y. Zhang, Y. L. Wang, and G. L. Chen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 181904 (2007).
  8. Z. Li, K. G. Pradeep, Y. Deng, D. Raabe, and C. C. Tasan, Nature 534, 227 (2016).
  9. O. N. Senkov, J. D. Miller, D. B. Miracle, and C. Wood- ward, Nat. Commun. 6, 6529 (2015).
  10. J. Lužnik, P. Kozelj, S. Vrtnik, A. Jelen, Z. Jagličić, A. Meden, M. Feuerbacher, and J. Dolinšek, Phys. Rev. B 92, 224201 (2015).
  11. P. Koželj, S. Vrtnik, A. Jelen, S. Jazbec, Z. Jagliči, S. Maiti, M. Feuerbacher, W. Steurer, and J. Dolinšek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 107001 (2014).
  12. S. Vrtnik, P. Koželj, A. Meden, S. Maiti, W. Steurer, M. Feuerbacher, and J. Dolinšek, J. Alloys and Compd. 695, 3530 (2017).
  13. K. Jasiewicz, B. Wiendlocha, P. Korbeń, S. Kaprzyk, and J. Tobola, Phys. Status Solidi Rapid Res. Lett. 10, 415 (2016).
  14. F. O. von Rohr, M. J. Winiarski, J. Tao, T. Klimczuk, and R. J. Cava, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113, E7144 (2016).
  15. K. Stolze, J. Tao, F. O. von Rohr, T. Kong, and R. J. Cava, Chem. of Mater. 30, 906 (2018).
  16. J. Guo, H. Wang, F. O. von Rohr, Z. Wang, S. Cai, Y. Zhou, K. Yang, A. Li, S. Jiang, Q. Wu, R. J. Cava, and L. Sun, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 114, 13144 (2017).
  17. W. L. McMillan, Phys. Rev. 167, 331 (1968).
  18. D. Singh, A. D. Hillier, A. Thamizhavel, and R. P. Singh, Physical Review B 94, 054515 (2016)
  19. D. Singh, K. P. Sajilesh, S. Marik, A. D. Hillier, and R. P. Singh, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 30, 125003 (2017).
  20. K. Hashimoto, K. Cho, T. Shibauchi, S. Kasahara, Y. Mizukami, R. Katsumata, Y. Tsuruhara, T. Terashima, H. Ikeda, M. A. Tanatar, H. Kitano, N. Salovich, R. W. Giannetta, P. Walmsley, A. Carrington, R. Prozorov, and Y. Matsuda, Science 336, 1554 (2012).
  21. R. Khasanov, H. Luetkens, A. Amato, H.-H. Klauss, Z.- A. Ren, J.Yang,W. Lu, and Z.-X. Zhao,Phys. Rev. B 78, 092506 (2008).
  22. D. A. Mayoh, J. A. T. Barker, R. P. Singh, G. Balakr- ishnan, D. McK. Paul, and M. R. Lees Phys. Rev. B 96, 064521 (2017).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marik, S., Varghese, M., Sajilesh, K. P., Singh, D., & Singh, R. P.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal (IN)
Corresponding author
Singh, R.P.
Venue
Journal of Alloys and Compounds
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
769
Pages
1059-1063
ISSN
0925-8388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2963457330
Cited by
83
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Alloys and Compounds (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Science and Engineering Research Board
  • Government of India (YSS/2015/001799, PDF/2016/000348)
  • DST-FIST (SR/FST/PSI195/2014(C))
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › High Entropy Alloys Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Superconducting Materials and Applications
Keywords
high-entropy alloys, superconductivity, type-II superconductors, critical temperature, critical magnetic field, specific heat, BCS theory, body-centered cubic lattice, superconducting transition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review