Cited by 197Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cerebrospinal fluid Aβ42 is the best predictor of clinical progression in patients with subjective complaints

Open access

Abstract

Background: The need to recognize Alzheimer's disease (AD) as early as possible led us to evaluate the predictive value of amyloid β(1‐42) (Aβ42), total tau (tau), and phosphorylated tau (ptau) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for clinical progression in patients with subjective complaints. Methods: We recruited nondemented patients with subjective complaints (i.e., criteria for mild cognitive impairment [MCI] not fulfilled) from our memory clinic. We assessed the predictive value of CSF Aβ42, tau, and ptau for clinical progression using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, gender, and baseline findings on the Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE). Clinical progression was defined as progression to MCI or AD. Results: We included 127 patients with subjective complaints (age 60 ± 10 years, 61 [48%] females, MMSE 29 ± 1). At baseline, Aβ42 and tau were abnormal in 20 patients (both 16%), and ptau in 32 patients (25%). Thirteen patients (10%) progressed to MCI (n = 11) or AD (n = 2). Aβ42 was the strongest predictor of progression to MCI or AD with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 16.0 (3.8–66.4). The adjusted HR associated with tau was 2.8 (0.9–9.2) and with ptau 2.6 (0.8–8.2). Combinations of biomarkers had a lower predictive value than Aβ42 alone. Conclusion: Low Aβ42 was the strongest predictor of clinical progression in patients with subjective complaints. These results are in line with the hypothesis that the cascade of pathologic events starts with deposition of Aβ42, whereas neuronal degeneration and hyperphosphorylation of tau are more downstream events, closer to clinical manifestation of AD.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.08.004

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 43 references

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–197 of 197

Metadata

Authors
van Harten, A. C., Visser, P. J., Pijnenburg, Y. A. L., Teunissen, C. E., Blankenstein, M. A., Scheltens, P., & van der Flier, W. M.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
Corresponding author
van Harten, Argonde C.
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-12-10
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
481-487
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W2013751858
Cited by
197
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 9
FWCI
10.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Alzheimer Nederland and Stichting VUmc Fonds
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, amyloid-beta 42
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Biomarkers, Proportional Hazards Models, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Disease Progression, Early Diagnosis, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review