Cited by 246Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence and incidence of clinically diagnosed Alzheimer's disease dementia from 1994 to 2012 in a population study

Open access

Abstract

Introduction: The trends in prevalence and incidence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia remain uncertain. Methods: A sample of 2794 participants with a clinical diagnosis for AD dementia were included. Results: The 2010 census standardized prevalence of AD dementia was 14.5% (95% CI = 13.7–15.3), and annual incidence was 2.3% (1.7–2.9). Both prevalence and incidence showed substantial variation over time, but no secular trends. The prevalence of AD dementia did not change significantly from 14.6% (95% CI = 13.0, 16.2) in 1994–1997 to 14.7% (95% CI = 13.2, 16.2) in 2010–2012 (P = .84). The annual incidence of AD dementia was 2.8% (95% CI = 2.2, 3.2) in 1998–2000 and 2.2% (95% CI = 1.6, 2.8) in 2004–2006 (P = .20) and remained steady in 2010–2012. The prevalence and incidence among African Americans were approximately twice than those among European Americans. Conclusions: The prevalence and incidence of AD dementia showed substantial variation between 1994 and 2012, but no secular trend.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.07.216

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 246

Metadata

Authors
Rajan, K. B., Weuve, J., Barnes, L. L., Wilson, R. S., & Evans, D. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • Rush University (US)
Corresponding author
Rajan, Kumar B.
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-09-06
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
1-7
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W2891083286
Cited by
245
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 1
FWCI
16.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (RF1-AG057532, R01-AG051635, R01-AG11101)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, dementia
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Black or African American, Female, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, United States, Incidence, Prevalence, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review