Cited by 93Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications

Comparison of 18F‐florbetaben quantification results using the standard Centiloid, MR‐based, and MR‐less CapAIBL® approaches: Validation against histopathology

Doré, Vincent, Bullich, Santiago, Rowe, Christopher C., Bourgeat, Pierrick, Konate, Salamata, Sabri, Osama, Stephens, Andrew W., Barthel, Henryk +6 more·2019·Alzheimer's & Dementia

Abstract

Introduction: 18 F‐florbetaben is currently approved for the visual rule out of β‐amyloid (Aβ) pathology. It is also used for recruitment and as an outcome measure in therapeutic trials, requiring accurate and reproducible quantification of Aβ burden in the brain. Methods: Data from eighty‐eight subjects (52 male subjects, aged 79.8 ± 10.6 years) who underwent antemortem 18 F‐florbetaben positron emission tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging less than a year before neuropathological assessment at autopsy were evaluated. Image analysis was performed using the standard Centiloid (CL) statistical parametric mapping approach and CapAIBL®. Imaging results were compared against autopsy data. Results: Against combined Bielschowsky silver staining and immunohistochemistry histopathological scores, statistical parametric mapping had 96% sensitivity, 96% specificity, and 95% accuracy, whereas magnetic resonance–less CapAIBL standardized uptake value ratio Whole Cerebellum had 94% sensitivity, 96% specificity, and 95% accuracy. Based on the combined histopathological scores, a CL threshold band of 19 ± 7 CL was determined. Discussion: Quantification of 18 F‐florbetaben positron emission tomography scans using magnetic resonance–based and magnetic resonance–less CapAIBL® approaches showed high agreement, establishing a pathology‐based threshold in CL.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.02.005

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A level of 20 centiloids or less is an accepted threshold for amyloid negativity.

    “From this work, ≤20 CL is an accepted threshold for amyloid negativity.”
  • La Joie et al. found that a CL threshold of 12.2 provided 88% accuracy, 89% sensitivity and 86% specificity for none to sparse amyloid on the CERAD scale, and a CL threshold of 23.5 provided 89% accuracy, 86% sensitivity and 96% specificity for moderate to frequent amyloid.

    “A CL threshold of 12.2 provided 88% accuracy, 89% sensitivity and 86% specificity for none to sparse amyloid in the CERAD scale, and a CL threshold of 23.5 provided 89% accuracy, 86% sensitivity and 96% specificity for moderate to frequent amyloid in the CERAD scale.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Doré, V., Bullich, S., Rowe, C. C., Bourgeat, P., Konate, S., Sabri, O., Stephens, A. W., Barthel, H., Fripp, J., Masters, C. L., Dinkelborg, L., Salvado, O., Villemagne, V. L., & De Santi, S.
Affiliations
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • Life Molecular Imaging, GmbH Berlin Germany
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • University Hospital Leipzig (DE)
  • CSIRO Health and Biosecurity Flagship The Australian e‐Health Research Centre Brisbane QLD Australia
  • Life Molecular Imaging Inc Boston MA USA
Corresponding author
Doré, Vincent
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-05-14
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
807-816
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W2945293516
Cited by
93
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 6
FWCI
10.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
NHMRC (1044361, 1011689, 1071430)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
18F-florbetaben, amyloid PET quantification
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Aniline Compounds, Autopsy, Brain, Cerebellum, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Stilbenes, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Radiopharmaceuticals, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review