Cited by 65Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensingWound Healing and TreatmentsOrthopedic Infections and Treatments

Quantitative Comparison and Analysis of Species-Specific Wound Biofilm Virulence Using an In Vivo, Rabbit-Ear Model

Seth, Akhil K., Geringer, Matthew R., Galiano, Robert D., Leung, Kai P., Mustoe, Thomas A., Hong, Seok J.·2012·Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although bacterial biofilm is recognized as an important contributor to chronic wound pathogenesis, differences in biofilm virulence between species have never been studied in vivo. STUDY DESIGN: Dermal punch wounds in New Zealand white rabbit ears were inoculated with Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, or Pseudomonas aeruginosa, or left uninfected as controls. In vivo biofilm was established and maintained using procedures from our previously published wound biofilm model. Virulence was assessed by measurement of histologic wound healing and host inflammatory mediators. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and bacterial counts verified biofilm viability. Extracellular polymeric substance (EPS)-deficient P aeruginosa was used for comparison. RESULTS: SEM confirmed the presence of wound biofilm for each species. P aeruginosa biofilm-infected wounds showed significantly more healing impairment than uninfected, K pneumoniae, and S aureus (p < 0.05), while also triggering the largest host inflammatory response (p < 0.05). Extracellular polymeric substance-deficient P aeruginosa demonstrated a reduced impact on the same quantitative endpoints relative to its wild-type strain (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our novel analysis demonstrates that individual bacterial species possess distinct levels of biofilm virulence. Biofilm EPS may represent an integral part of their distinct pathogenicity. Rigorous examination of species-dependent differences in biofilm virulence is critical to developing specific therapeutics, while lending insight to the interactions within clinically relevant, polybacterial biofilms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.05.028

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seth, A. K., Geringer, M. R., Galiano, R. D., Leung, K. P., Mustoe, T. A., & Hong, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • United States Army Institute of Surgical Research (US)
Corresponding author
Hong, Seok J.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Published
2012-09
Volume
215
Issue
3
Pages
388-399
ISSN
1072-7515 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087835752
Cited by
65
References
49
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Surgeons (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
Keywords
wound biofilm, biofilm virulence, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, extracellular polymeric substances, delayed wound healing, host inflammatory response, rabbit ear model
MeSH terms
Animals, Ear, External, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Polysaccharides, Bacterial, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Rabbits, RNA, Bacterial, RNA, Messenger, Staphylococcus aureus, Virulence, Wound Healing, Biomarkers, Soft Tissue Injuries, Biofilms, Inflammation Mediators, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Models, Animal, Bacterial Load

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review