Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 395

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Income and Race/Ethnicity Are Associated with Adherence to Food-Based Dietary Guidance among US Adults and Children

Open access
Kirkpatrick, Sharon I., Dodd, Kevin W., Reedy, Jill, Krebs-Smith, Susan M.·2012·Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

Abstract

Background Income and race/ethnicity are associated with differences in dietary intakes that may contribute to health disparities among the United States population. Objective To examine alignment of intakes of food groups and energy from solid fats, added sugars, and alcohol with the 2005 Dietary Guidelines and MyPyramid, by family income and race/ethnicity. Design Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), a cross-sectional nationally-representative survey, for 2001-2004. Participants/setting Persons aged 2 years and older for whom reliable dietary intake data were available (n=16,338) were categorized by income (lowest, middle, and highest) and race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White (NHW), non-Hispanic Black (NHB), and Mexican-American (MA)). Statistical analyses performed The National Cancer Institute (NCI) method was used to estimate the proportions of adults and children in each income and race/ethnic group whose usual intakes met the recommendations. Results Higher income was associated with greater adherence to recommendations for most food groups; the proportions meeting minimum recommendations among adults in the highest income group were double that observed for the lowest income group for total vegetables, milk, and oils. Fewer differences by income were apparent among children. Among the race/ethnic groups, the proportions meeting recommendations were generally lowest among NHB. Marked differences were observed for milk—15% of NHB children met the minimum recommendations compared to 42% of NHW children and 35% of MA children; a similar pattern was evident for adults. One in five Mexican American adults met the dry beans and peas recommendations compared to approximately 2% of NHW and NHB. Most adults and children consumed excess energy from solid fats and added sugars irrespective of income and race/ethnicity. Conclusions The diets of some subpopulations, particularly individuals in lower-income households and NHB, are especially poor in relation to dietary recommendations, supporting the need for comprehensive strategies to enable healthier dietary intake patterns.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jand.2011.11.012

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 395

Metadata

Authors
Kirkpatrick, S. I., Dodd, K. W., Reedy, J., & Krebs-Smith, S. M.
Venue
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-05
Volume
112
Issue
5
Pages
624-635.e6
ISSN
2212-2672 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066647137
Cited by
395
References
3
FWCI
28.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.