CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 23

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relative Validity of a Semi-Quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire to Estimate Dietary Intake According to the NOVA Classification in Mexican Children and Adolescents

Oviedo-Solís, Cecilia Isabel, Monterrubio-Flores, Eric A., Cediel, Gustavo, Denova-Gutiérrez, Edgar, Barquera, Simón·2022·Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
DOI 10.1016/j.jand.2021.11.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) are associated with poor diet quality and chronic diseases. UPFs fall into 1 of the following 4 groups classified according to the extent and purpose of processing: group 1 is unprocessed or minimally processed foods (MPFs); group 2 is processed culinary ingredients; group 3 is processed foods; and group 4 is UPFs. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative validity of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (SFFQ) compared with two 24-hour dietary recalls (24DRs) `to estimate dietary intake per NOVA food group in Mexican children and adolescents. Design This study is a secondary analysis of dietary data from a subsample of children and adolescents who participated in the 2012 Mexican National Health and Nutrition Survey. Participants/setting The study participants were 217 children (aged 5 through 11 years) and 165 adolescents (aged 12 through 19 years) with complete information for the SFFQ and two 24DRs. Main outcome measures Daily averages of energy intake and percent of energy intake for each NOVA category were calculated using the SFFQ and two 24DRs. Statistical analysis To assess relative validity, the SFFQ was compared with two 24DRs to estimate dietary intake per NOVA food group. Mean differences, Spearman correlations, intraclass correlations coefficients (ICCs), and Bland-Altman plots for continuous variables and weighted κ for ordinal variables were calculated. Results For percentage of energy inta…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jand.2021.11.002

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several 24 h dietary recalls and food frequency questionnaires specifically designed to assess consumption of Nova food groups have been developed.

    “Several 24 h dietary recalls and food frequency questionnaires specifically designed to assess consumption of Nova food groups have been developed 202,206,[208][209][210][211]”

    From Ultra-processed foods and human health: the main thesis and the evidence (2025) · cites this paper as [206]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Monteiro, 2010, Increasing consumption of ultra-processed foods and likely impact on human health: Evidence from Brazil, Public Health Nutr, 14, 5, 10.1017/S1368980010003241 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Monteiro, 2018, The UN decade of nutrition, the NOVA food classification and the trouble with ultra-processing, Public Health Nutr, 21, 5, 10.1017/S1368980017000234 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Marrón-Ponce, 2019, Associations between consumption of ultra-processed foods and intake of nutrients related to chronic non-communicable diseases in Mexico, J Acad Nutr Diet, 119, 1852, 10.1016/j.jand.2019.04.020 · DOI
  4. da Costa Louzada, 2015, Impact of ultra-processed foods on micronutrient content in the Brazilian diet, Rev Saude Publica, 49, 1, 10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049006211 · DOI
  5. da Costa Louzada, 2015, Ultra-processed foods and the nutritional dietary profile in Brazil, Rev Saude Publica, 49
  6. da Costa Louzada, 2018, The share of ultra-processed foods determines the overall nutritional quality of diets in Brazil, Public Health Nutr, 21, 94, 10.1017/S1368980017001434 · DOI
  7. Cunha, 2018, Ultra-processed food consumption and adiposity trajectories in a Brazilian cohort of adolescents: ELANA study, Nutr Diabetes, 8, 28, 10.1038/s41387-018-0043-z · DOI
  8. Moubarac, 2017, Consumption of ultra-processed foods predicts diet quality in Canada, Appetite, 108, 512, 10.1016/j.appet.2016.11.006 · DOI
  9. Marrón-Ponce, 2018, Energy contribution of NOVA food groups and sociodemographic determinants of ultra-processed food consumption in the Mexican population, Public Health Nutr, 21, 87, 10.1017/S1368980017002129 · DOI
  10. Poti, 2017, Ultra-processed food intake and obesity: What really matters for healthProcessing or nutrient content?, Curr Obes Rep, 6, 420, 10.1007/s13679-017-0285-4 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Elizabeth, 2020, Ultra-processed foods and health outcomes: A narrative review, Nutrients, 12, 1955, 10.3390/nu12071955 · DOI
  12. Silva Meneguelli, 2020, Food consumption by degree of processing and cardiometabolic risk: A systematic review, Int J Food Sci Nutr, 71, 678, 10.1080/09637486.2020.1725961 · DOI
  13. Aguayo-Patrón, 2017, Old fashioned vs. ultra-processed-based current diets: Possible implication in the increased susceptibility to type 1 diabetes and celiac disease in childhood, Foods, 6, 100, 10.3390/foods6110100 · DOI
  14. Costa, 2018, Consumption of ultra-processed foods and body fat during childhood and adolescence: A systematic review, Public Health Nutr, 21, 148, 10.1017/S1368980017001331 · DOI
  15. Rauber, 2015, Consumption of ultra-processed food products and its effects on children’s lipid profiles: A longitudinal study, Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis, 25, 116, 10.1016/j.numecd.2014.08.001 · DOI
  16. Leffa, 2020, Longitudinal associations between ultra-processed foods and blood lipids in childhood, Br J Nutr, 124, 341, 10.1017/S0007114520001233 · DOI
  17. Costa, 2019, Ultra-processed food consumption and its effects on anthropometric and glucose profile: A longitudinal study during childhood, Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis, 29, 177, 10.1016/j.numecd.2018.11.003 · DOI
  18. Filgueiras, 2019, Exploring the consumption of ultra-processed foods and its association with food addiction in overweight children, Appetite, 135, 137, 10.1016/j.appet.2018.11.005 · DOI
  19. Edalati, 2021, Higher ultra-processed food intake is associated with higher DNA damage in healthy adolescents, Br J Nutr, 125, 568, 10.1017/S0007114520001981 · DOI
  20. Moreno-Galarraga, 2021, Consumo de productos ultraprocesados y enfermedades respiratorias sibilantes en niños. Proyecto SENDO, An Pediatr, 95, 18, 10.1016/j.anpedi.2020.05.021 · DOI
  21. Oliveira, 2020, Can the consumption of ultra-processed food be associated with anthropometric indicators of obesity and blood pressure in children 7 to 10 years old?, Foods, 9, 1567, 10.3390/foods9111567 · DOI
  22. Viera de Melo, 2017, Consumption of minimally processed food is inversely associated with excess weight in adolescents living in an underdeveloped city, PLoS One, 12
  23. Marrón-Ponce, 2018, Trends in ultra-processed food purchases from 1984 to 2016 in Mexican households, Nutrients, 11, 45, 10.3390/nu11010045 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Cediel, 2018, Ultra-processed foods and added sugars in the Chilean diet (2010), Public Health Nutr, 21, 125, 10.1017/S1368980017001161 · DOI
  25. Fangupo, 2019, Relative validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire to assess energy intake from minimally processed and ultra-processed foods in young children, Nutrients, 11, 1290, 10.3390/nu11061290 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Shim, 2014, Dietary assessment methods in epidemiologic studies, Epidemiol Health, 36, 10.4178/epih/e2014009 · DOI
  27. Ramírez-Silva, 2016, Methodology for estimating dietary data from the semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire of the Mexican National Health and Nutrition Survey 2012, Salud Publica Mex, 58, 629, 10.21149/spm.v58i6.7974 · DOI
  28. Kelly, 2018, Public Health Nutrition special issue on ultra-processed foods, Public Health Nutr, 21, 1, 10.1017/S1368980017002853 · DOI
  29. Denova-Gutiérrez, 2016, Relative validity of a food frequency questionnaire to identify dietary patterns in an adult Mexican population, Salud Publica Mex, 58, 608, 10.21149/spm.v58i6.7842 · DOI
  30. Denova-Gutiérrez, 2016, Validity of a food frequency questionnaire to assess food intake in Mexican adolescent and adult population, Salud Publica Mex, 58, 617, 10.21149/spm.v58i6.7862 · DOI
  31. Romero-Martínez, 2013, Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición 2012: Diseño y cobertura, Salud Publica Mex, 55, 332, 10.21149/spm.v55s2.5132 · DOI
  32. Hernández-Avila, 1998, Validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire to assess dietary intake of women living in Mexico City, Salud Publica Mex, 40, 133, 10.1590/S0036-36341998000200005 · DOI
  33. López-Ridaura, 2016, Metodología y validez del cuestionario de frencuencia de consumo utilizado en la Ensanut 2012 de México, Salud Publica Mex, 58, 602, 10.21149/spm.58i6.8398 · DOI
  34. Safdie, 2004, Bases de datos del valor nutritivo de los alimentos, México Inst Nac Salud Pública, 51, S562
  35. López-Olmedo, 2016, Usual intake of added sugars and saturated fats is high while dietary fiber is low in the Mexican population, J Nutr, 146, 1856S
  36. Gutiérrez, 2013, Clasificación socioeconómica de los hogares en la ENSANUT 2012, Salud Publica Mex, 55, 341, 10.21149/spm.v55s2.5133 · DOI
  37. Kottner, 2011, Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed, J Clin Epidemiol, 64, 96, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.002 · DOI
  38. Landis, 1977, The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data, Biometrics, 33, 159, 10.2307/2529310 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Kirkpatrick, 2019, Best practices for conducting and interpreting studies to validate self-report dietary assessment methods, J Acad Nutr Diet, 119, 1801, 10.1016/j.jand.2019.06.010 · DOI
  40. Cade, 2002, Warm D. Development, validation and utilisation of food-frequency questionnairesA review, Public Health Nutr, 5, 567, 10.1079/PHN2001318 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Fatihah, 2015, Development and validation of a food frequency questionnaire for dietary intake assessment among multi-ethic primary school-aged children, Singapore Med J, 56, 687, 10.11622/smedj.2015190 · DOI
  42. Melo, 2018, Associations of ultra-processed food and drink products with asthma and wheezing among Brazilian adolescents, Pediatr Allergy Immunol, 29, 504, 10.1111/pai.12911 · DOI
  43. Shamah-Levy, 2018, Sobrepeso y obesidad en niños y adolescentes en México, actualización de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición de Medio Camino 2016, Salud Publica Mex, 60, 244, 10.21149/8815 · DOI
  44. Lane, 2021, Ultraprocessed food and chronic noncommunicable diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 43 observational studies, Obes Rev, 22, 1, 10.1111/obr.13146 · DOI · Paper page
  45. White, 2020, Mexico adopts food warning labels, why now?, Heal Syst Reform, 6
  46. Sánchez-Romero, 2020, Association between tax on sugar sweetened beverages and soft drink consumption in adults in Mexico: Open cohort longitudinal analysis of Health Workers Cohort Study, BMJ, 369, m1311, 10.1136/bmj.m1311 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Oviedo-Solís, C. I., Monterrubio-Flores, E. A., Cediel, G., Denova-Gutiérrez, E., & Barquera, S.
ORCID
Oviedo-Solís, Cecilia Isabel
Venue
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-06
Volume
122
Issue
6
Pages
1129-1140
ISSN
2212-2672
DOI
10.1016/j.jand.2021.11.002
Cited by
23
References
6
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review