The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
More reasons to be straightforward: Findings and norms for two scales relevant to social anxiety
Open accessAbstract
The validity of both the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation scale has been well-supported, yet the scales have a small number of reverse-scored items that may detract from the validity of their total scores. The current study investigates two characteristics of participants that may be associated with compromised validity of these items: higher age and lower levels of education. In community and clinical samples, the validity of each scale's reverse-scored items was moderated by age, years of education, or both. The straightforward items did not show this pattern. To encourage the use of the straightforward items of these scales, we provide normative data from the same samples as well as two large student samples. We contend that although response bias can be a substantial problem, the reverse-scored questions of these scales do not solve that problem and instead decrease overall validity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Participants exhibited elevated symptoms of social anxiety (LSAS, M = 80.48, SD = 15.71; SIAS-SF, M = 45.86, SD = 6.90) comparable to treatment-seeking samples reported in prior research (e.g., Clark et al., 2006; Rodebaugh et al., 2011).”
From The affective tie that binds: Examining the contribution of positive emotions and anxiety to relationship formation in social anxiety disorder (2017) · cites this paper as Rodebaugh et al., 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-3352 · Cited by 36,647
The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition
Salthouse, T. A. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.3.403 · Cited by 5,902 · cited 1×
“Increasing age is correlated with decreases in cognitive abilities such as explicit memory, reasoning, and processing speed (Salthouse, 1996, 2000; Schaie & Willis, 1993).”
BackgroundMeasurement of social-evaluative anxiety.
Watson, D., & Friend, R. (1969) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027806 · Cited by 3,467 · cited 1×
“The BFNE (Leary, 1983) is a 12-item measure based on the original Fear of Negative Evaluation scale (FNE; Watson & Friend, 1969) and employing a 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely) Likert-type scale.”
MethodMattick, R. P., & Clarke, J. C. (1998) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(97)10031-6 · Cited by 3,367 · cited 2×
“The Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation scale (BFNE; Leary, 1983) and the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS; Mattick & Clarke, 1998) both have a small number of reverse-scored items that have demonstrated problematic reliability and validity across multiple studies (Carleton et al., 2009; Duke,…”
BackgroundMethodBeckman, R. J., & Weisberg, S. (1987) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1269895 · Cited by 2,835
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Raber, G., & Spokas, M. (2024) · doi:10.4135/9781071886229.n145 · Cited by 2,806
Amelia II: A Program for Missing Data
Honaker, J., King, G., & Blackwell, M. (2011) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v045.i07 · Cited by 2,552
A brief version of the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale
Leary, M. R. (1983) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167283093007 · Cited by 2,178 · cited 3×
“The measure related highly to the FNE and demonstrated very good test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and convergent validity (Leary, 1983).”
BackgroundMethodAging and measures of processing speed
Salthouse, T. A. (2000) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0511(00)00052-1 · Cited by 1,114 · cited 3×
“Increasing age is correlated with decreases in cognitive abilities such as explicit memory, reasoning, and processing speed (Salthouse, 1996, 2000; Schaie & Willis, 1993).”
BackgroundResult
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 200
Korte, K. J., & Schmidt, N. B. (2020) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.04.001 · Cited by 13
“It is also notable that the upper bound cut-off is comparable to the clinical cut-offs established for each scale (Brown et al, 1997; Fresco et al, 2003) and that the lower bound cut-off is above the norm established for these scales (Rodebaugh et al., 2011; Gillis, Haaga, & Ford, 1995).”
Clarifying the Behavioral Economics of Social Anxiety Disorder
Rodebaugh, T. L., Heimberg, R. G., Taylor, K., & Lenze, E. J. (2015) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702615578128 · Cited by 14
Self-citationBorgogna, N. C., Spencer, S. D., Johnson, D. A., Brasil, K. M., McDermott, R. C., Kraus, S. W., & Buchanan, J. A. (2023) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2023.10.001 · Cited by 14
Clinical and Psychosocial Predictors of Post-Event Processing in Adults Who Stutter
Croft, R. L., & Byrd, C. T. (2023) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2023_jslhr-23-00245 · Cited by 13
Williams, J. R., Sindermann, C., Yang, H., Montag, C., & Elhai, J. D. (2023) · Cyberpsychology Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace · doi:10.5817/cp2023-5-7 · Cited by 15
“For this study we used only the 17 non-reverse items of the scale (Rodebaugh et al., 2011).”
MethodTelEMA: a low-cost and user-friendly telephone assessment platform
Fernandez, K. C., Johnson, M. R., & Rodebaugh, T. L. (2012) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0287-9 · Cited by 12
“A straightforward score of 28 has been found to correspond to a cutoff for possible social anxiety disorder (Rodebaugh et al., 2011).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSafety Behaviors and Social Anxiety: An Examination of the Social Phobia Safety Behaviours Scale
Kocovski, N. L., MacKenzie, M. B., Albiani, J. J., Battista, S. R., Noel, S., Fleming, J. E., & Antony, M. M. (2015) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-015-9498-6 · Cited by 13
Focussing Attention on Oneself Increases the Perception of Being Observed by Others
Canvin, L., Janecka, M., & Clark, D. M. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychopathology · doi:10.5127/jep.047315 · Cited by 11
“Rodebaugh et al. (2011) have also suggested that ignoring the reverse-scored items may enhance the validity of the BFNE to discriminate high and low social anxiety disorder, which may need to be considered for future studies.”
BackgroundOzbek, S., Greville, W. J., & Hooper, N. (2023) · Psychology of Popular Media · doi:10.1037/ppm0000464 · Cited by 11
Social anxiety and interpersonal risk for suicidal ideation: A longitudinal daily diary analysis
Brown, B. A., Rottenberg, J. A., & Goodman, F. R. (2023) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.12996 · Cited by 11
Fung, K., & Alden, L. E. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Psychopathology · doi:10.1177/2043808719888309 · Cited by 10
“Social anxiety was assessed using the straightforward items (Rodebaugh et al., 2011) of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (Mattick & Clarke, 1998).”
MethodGordon, E. A., Johnson, K., Heimberg, R. G., Montesi, J. L., & Fauber, R. L. (2013) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.2013.32.2.200 · Cited by 11
Self-citationButler, R. M., O’Day, E. B., & Heimberg, R. G. (2020) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506073.2020.1829027 · Cited by 13
Self-citationPenn State Worry Questionnaire – 10: A new tool for measurement-based care
Yao, B., Sripada, R. K., Klumpp, H., Abelson, J. L., Muzik, M., Zhao, Z., Rosenblum, K. L., Briggs, H., Kaston, M., & Warren, R. (2016) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2016.02.069 · Cited by 11
“Additionally, negatively worded items are difficult to process, especially for people of higher age or lower levels of education (Rodebaugh et al., 2011; Rosenthal, 1980).”
BackgroundPROMIS Scores for Plantar Fasciitis Before and After Gastrocnemius Recession
Sanchez, T., Sankey, T., Schick, S., Arthur, R. Y., Young, M., Underwood, M., Harrelson, W. M., & Shah, A. B. (2023) · Foot & Ankle International · doi:10.1177/10711007231159105 · Cited by 9
Vasan, S., Lim, M. H., Eikelis, N., & Lambert, É. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-65039-8 · Cited by 16
“Indeed, a 2018 survey found 51% of Australian adults felt lonely at least 1 day a week 9 .”
Within Your Control? When Problem Solving May Be Most Helpful
Sarfan, L. D., Gooch, P., & Clerkin, E. M. (2018) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/0145445517726300 · Cited by 7
“SIAS-S.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe structure of social-evaluative threat detection in social anxiety disorder
Wong, Q. J. J., McEvoy, P. M., & Rapee, R. M. (2020) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102273 · Cited by 11
Stein, J., Modini, M., Hunt, C., & Abbott, M. J. (2016) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-016-9573-7 · Cited by 9
Lewis, E. M., Heimberg, R. G., Gilroy, S. P., & Buckner, J. D. (2020) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2020.10.002 · Cited by 8
Self-citationWong, Q. J. J., Gregory, B., Norton, A. R., Shikatani, B., Boulton, K., Torok, M. H., Porter, M. A., Peters, L., Abbott, M. J., & Antony, M. M. (2021) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102365 · Cited by 8
Rodebaugh, T. L., Tonge, N., Piccirillo, M. L., Fried, E. I., Horenstein, A., Morrison, A. S., Goldin, P. R., Gross, J. J., Lim, M. H., Fernandez, K. C., et al. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/kx6y8 · Cited by 12
Self-citationThe role of fear of evaluation in group perception.
Shin, J., & Rodebaugh, T. (2023) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102791 · Cited by 6
Self-citationLei, X., Sasisekaran, J., & Nguyen‐Feng, V. N. (2024) · Journal of Fluency Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2024.106061 · Cited by 9
Morales, K. L. (2013) · Digital Commons (Liberty University) · Cited by 6
Dealing with Rejection: Post-Event Processing in Social Anxiety and Paranoia
Piccirillo, M. L., & Heimberg, R. G. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychopathology · doi:10.5127/jep.054816 · Cited by 7
“Studies have demonstrated that the reverse-worded items do not contribute and potentially detract from the validity of the scale (for review, see Rodebaugh et al., 2011).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationReyes, N., Boulton, K., Han, J., Torok, M. H., & Wong, Q. (2020) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-019-10074-3 · Cited by 7
Mindfulness training for clinically elevated social anxiety: The impact on peak drinking.
Buckner, J. D., Lewis, E. M., Abarno, C. N., & Heimberg, R. G. (2020) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106282 · Cited by 5
Self-citationSocial Anxiety and Social Surrogacy in College Roommate Relationships
Boucher, E. M., & Cummings, J. A. (2017) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.2090 · Cited by 7
“socre of Rodebaugh et al. (2011) for possible clinical levels”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSwee, M. B., Butler, R. M., Ross, B. V., Horenstein, A., O’Day, E. B., & Heimberg, R. G. (2021) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-020-10192-3 · Cited by 6
Self-citationHowell, A. N., Woods, S. J., Farmer, W., Zibulsky, D. A., Srivastav, A., Randolph, G. A. T., & Weeks, J. W. (2024) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2024.07.140 · Cited by 5
Love, A. M. A., Edwards, C., Dueber, D., Cai, R. Y., Grace, K., Toland, M. D., Lim, M. H., & Gibbs, V. (2025) · Autism in Adulthood · doi:10.1089/aut.2024.0258 · Cited by 5
“The Social Interaction Anxiety Scale – Straightforward (S-SIAS) 38,39 describes anxiety-related reactions to a variety of social interaction situations to measure social anxiety.”
InfluentialPositive Affect and Social Anxiety Across the Lifespan: An Investigation of Age as a Moderator
Weisman, J. S., Rodebaugh, T. L., Brown, P. J., & Mulligan, E. A. (2014) · Clinical Gerontologist · doi:10.1080/07317115.2014.970317 · Cited by 5
“, Rodebaugh et al., 2007, for a review and extension), the present studies utilized only the straightforward SIAS items (S-SIAS) for all analyses (α = .93). To the best of our knowledge, no evidence has been found that the omission of the reverse-scored items of the SIAS results in reduced validity despite repeated te…”
MethodSelf-citationTesting the efficacy of a brief exercise intervention for enhancing exposure therapy outcomes
Weisman, J. S., & Rodebaugh, T. L. (2020) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102266 · Cited by 5
Self-citationCardiovascular Responses to Social Stress Elicited by the Cyberball Task
Eres, R., Bolton, I., Lim, M. H., Lambert, G. W., & Lambert, É. (2021) · Heart and Mind · doi:10.4103/hm.hm_31_21 · Cited by 5
Investigating stereotypes of social anxiety
Fox, J. M., Fernandez, K. C., Rodebaugh, T. L., Menatti, A. R., & Weeks, J. W. (2015) · Anxiety Stress & Coping · doi:10.1080/10615806.2015.1035999 · Cited by 5
“Overall, research on the scale suggests good to excellent reliability and good construct and convergent validity (see Heimberg & Turk, 2002 for a review), particularly when the reverse-scored items are omitted, as they are here (see Rodebaugh et al., 2011 for a review).”
BackgroundSelf-citationMorris, P. E., Vargo, L. A., & Buckner, J. D. (2024) · Substance Use & Misuse · doi:10.1080/10826084.2024.2320400 · Cited by 4
“Regarding social anxiety, 22.3% of the sample scored above the clinical cutoff for social anxiety disorder (SAD; per Rodebaugh et al., 2011).”
BackgroundInfluentialKo, Y. C., Kim, H. E., Kim, B.-H., Ham, K., Lee, S., Park, B., & Kim, J. (2025) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2025.03.104 · Cited by 4
Attention allocation to subliminally presented affective faces in high and low social anxiety
Duval, E. R., Lovelace, C. T., & Filion, D. L. (2020) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.04.017 · Cited by 4
Folyi, T., Rohr, M., & Wentura, D. (2023) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2023.104254 · Cited by 4
Revisiting the Social Surrogate Hypothesis: Social Anxiety and Recruiting Others for Social Events
Boucher, E. M., & Cummings, J. A. (2014) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.2014.33.7.653 · Cited by 4
“74), ranging from 0 to 61, and approximately 32% of the participants reported scores above the cutoff score for clinical levels of SA (28) suggested by Rodebaugh et al. (2011). Mean levels of SA did not differ significantly across the two samples, t(114.”
BackgroundSocial Anxiety and Misinterpretation of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Describe Subscale
Jensen, D., Bruce, L. C., Heimberg, R., Matt, L. M., & Morrison, A. S. (2016) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.30.3.168 · Cited by 4
“4% of the sample scored above the clinical cut-off proposed for the SIAS-S (SIAS-S 28; Rodebaugh et al., 2011), a proportion that is representative of the student body at this large, public, urban university, suggesting that a wide range of social anxiety scores were provided by our participants.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citation"r u mad @ me?": Social anxiety and interpretation bias in computer-mediated contexts
Kingsbury, M. K. (2014) · Carleton University's Institutional Repository (MacOdrum Library, Carleton University) · doi:10.22215/etd/2014-10508 · Cited by 4
“However, other authors have reported a lack of gender differences in community samples of young adults and college students (Mattick & Clarke, 1998; Rodebaugh et al., 2011).”
BackgroundBolt, O. C., Ehlers, A., & Clark, D. M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0106400 · Cited by 3
“= 45 or , = 31) [12,13] and respectively scored in pre-determined high and low ranges on the Albany Panic and Phobia Questionnaire, social phobia subscale (APPQSP) [14].”
BackgroundKaplan, S. C., Butler, R. M., & Heimberg, R. G. (2023) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-023-10404-6 · Cited by 3
“A score of 28 or above on this scale indicates a probable diagnosis of SAD (Rodebaugh et al., 2011).”
Self-citationExploring linguistic correlates of social anxiety in romantic stories
Fernandez, K. C., Gordon, E. A., Rodebaugh, T. L., & Heimberg, R. G. (2016) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506073.2016.1184711 · Cited by 3
“Social anxiety disorder (SAD) involves persistent and excessive fear of negative evaluation in and avoidance of social situations that cause distress and impairment (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationTsekova, V., Lenton‐Brym, A. P., Rogojanski, J., Hood, H. K., Vorstenbosch, V., McCabe, R. E., & Antony, M. M. (2021) · Anxiety Stress & Coping · doi:10.1080/10615806.2020.1870108 · Cited by 3
“The BFNE-S has demonstrated excellent internal consistency (e.g., Rodebaugh et al., 2011).”
MethodFolyi, T., Lindenhahn, L., Rohr, M., & Wentura, D. (2024) · Journal of Affective Disorders Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100739 · Cited by 2
Validation of the Ambivalent and Purposeful Engagement – Trait Measure
Fernandez, K. C., Langer, J., Rodebaugh, T. L., Jakatdar, T. A., Heimberg, R. G., & Lenze, E. J. (2013) · Anxiety Stress & Coping · doi:10.1080/10615806.2013.838228 · Cited by 2
Self-citationCorreia, L., Vagos, P., & Rijo, D. (2014) · Laboratório de Psicologia · doi:10.14417/lp.653 · Cited by 2
Kuusikko‐Gauffin, S., Wurman, R. P., Mattila, M., Jussila, K. K., Ebeling, H. E., & Moilanen, I. K. (2012) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.78 · Cited by 3
“The eight-item straightforward coded subscale of the BFNE (BFNE-S) has shown better reliability and validity than the fouritem reverse coded subscale [33-45].”
MethodClinical Assessment of Late-Life Anxiety
Gould, C. E., Kok, B. C., Ma, V. K., & Edelstein, B. A. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781139087469.006 · Cited by 2
Walukevich‐Dienst, K., Newins, A. R., Zamboanga, B. L., Dehmer, M. L., Ham, L. S., & Kim, S. Y. (2024) · Emerging Adulthood · doi:10.1177/21676968241275713 · Cited by 1
“3 The three reverse-coded items decrease validity among college student young adults samples (Rodebaugh et al., 2011), thus we used the 17 remaining items ( α = .95), per prior work among college samples who use substances (e.g., Morris & Buckner, 2023).”
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety Disorders
(2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108355605.003 · Cited by 1
Hope, D. A., Heimberg, R. G., & Turk, C. L. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med-psych/9780190247591.003.0002 · Cited by 1
Self-citationWong, Q. J. J., Hamrick, H. C., Clague, C. A., & Judah, M. R. (2022) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/10731911221127911 · Cited by 1
“Notably, the mean social anxiety level in both samples was higher than community and student norms, and as expected, was lower, but more variable, compared with clinical norms (Rodebaugh et al., 2011).”
ResultFélix, A., Ferreira, A., & Vagos, P. (2022) · Psicologia · doi:10.17575/psicologia.1788 · Cited by 1
Walukevich‐Dienst, K., Zamboanga, B. L., Newins, A. R., Dehmer, M. L., Ham, L. S., Grigsby, T. J., & Kim, S. Y. (2024) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-024-10471-3 · Cited by 1
“The Social Inter-action Anxiety Scale (SIAS; Mattick & Clarke, 1998) is a 20-item measure 1 assessing anxiety related to differ - ent social situations measured (from 0 = “ not at all ” to 4 = “ extremely ”).”
InfluentialSocial anxiety and weight interact with body salience to affect experiences of social exclusion
Butler, R. M., Kaplan, S. C., & Heimberg, R. G. (2024) · Anxiety Stress & Coping · doi:10.1080/10615806.2024.2399086 · Cited by 1
“The Straightforward Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS-S; Rodebaugh et al., 2006; Rodebaugh et al., 2011) comprises 17 items assessing anxiety during social interactions.”
Self-citationWalukevich‐Dienst, K., Graupensperger, S. A., Piccirillo, M. L., Smith‐LeCavalier, K. N., Acolin, J., & Larimer, M. E. (2025) · Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/acer.70077 · Cited by 1
Empathic Communication Among Women with High or Low Social Anxiety
Byrne, S. E., & Rapee, R. M. (2021) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-021-10248-y · Cited by 1
“Within social relationships, people high in social anxiety show several communication deficits including less selfdisclosure, lower intimacy, and less emotional expression (Cuming & Rapee, 2010; Fernandez & Rodebaugh, 2011; Montesi et al., 2012; Plasencia et al., 2016; Sparrevohn & Rapee, 2009).”
BackgroundA Multidimensional Approach to the Study of Social Anxiety and Friendships
Fernandez, K. C. (2014) · Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis) · doi:10.7936/k7z0369k
“Despite the comorbidity between social anxiety and depression, there is evidence that SAD is associated with impairment in friendships above and beyond depression; for example, Rodebaugh (2009) found a specific link between SAD and perceived friendship quality, above and beyond a variety of demographic variables and o…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationLevinson, C. A. (2015) · Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis) · doi:10.7936/k72r3pwh
“Participants’ social anxiety scores (as measured by the Straightforward Social Interaction Anxiety Scale; Mattick & Clark, 1998; Rodebaugh et al., 2011) ranged from very low (0) to very high (65), with a mean score of 25.00.”
MethodInfluentialSocial Anxiety and Gaze Aversion: Manipulating Eye Contact in a Social Interaction
Langer, J. (2011) · Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis) · doi:10.7936/k75t3hk1
“Rodebaugh et al. (2011) review evidence that suggests that the reverse-scored items fail to load on the same factor as the other items and are less related to social anxiety and more related to extraversion than is desirable.”
Examining the Relationship Between Social Anxiety and Positive Social Attention
Neczypor, B. N. (2015) · OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)
The Fear and Avoidance Hierarchy
Hope, D. A., Heimberg, R. G., & Turk, C. L. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med-psych/9780190247591.003.0004
Self-citationHope, D. A., Heimberg, R. G., & Turk, C. L. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med-psych/9780190247591.003.0003
Self-citationAdditional Tools for Challenging Automatic Thoughts
Hope, D. A., Heimberg, R. G., & Turk, C. L. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med-psych/9780190247591.003.0009
Self-citationHope, D. A., Heimberg, R. G., & Turk, C. L. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med-psych/9780190247591.003.0005
Self-citationHope, D. A., Heimberg, R. G., & Turk, C. L. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med-psych/9780190247591.003.0001
Self-citationAssessment of Anxiety Disorders and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Peters, L., McLellan, L. F., & Brockveld, K. C. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108235433.024 · Cited by 1
Lewis, E. M. (2019) · doi:10.31390/gradschool_theses.5122
“…20-item measure, the 17 straightforward worded items were used given that the total score of these items appear to be more valid indicators of social anxiety than the total score including the reverse scored items in both undergraduate and clinical samples (for review, see Rodebaugh et al., 2011).”
MethodIndependent Psychometric Evaluation and Predictive Utility of The Social Anxiety Questionnaire
Kraft, J. D., Grant, D., Nagel, K. M., Deros, D. E., Frosio, K. E., Taylor, D. L., & White, E. J. (2021) · Psychiatric quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11126-021-09958-z
“92), Social Interaction Anxiety Scale-straight forward (SIAS-sf; [15, 41, 42], Social Phobia Scale (SPS [15]; α = .”
BackgroundCognitive Behavioral Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder
Swee, M. B., Dryman, M. T., & Heimberg, R. G. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108355605.007
Self-citationDeros, D. E., Grant, D. M., Kraft, J. D., Nagel, K. M., & Hahn, B. J. (2022) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-021-09924-w
Hope, D. A., Heimberg, R. G., & Turk, C. L. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med-psych/9780190247591.003.0006
Self-citationExposure and Cognitive Restructuring
Hope, D. A., Heimberg, R. G., & Turk, C. L. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med-psych/9780190247591.003.0010
Self-citationAdvanced Cognitive Restructuring
Hope, D. A., Heimberg, R. G., & Turk, C. L. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med-psych/9780190247591.003.0012
Self-citationHope, D. A., Heimberg, R. G., & Turk, C. L. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med-psych/9780190247591.003.0013
Self-citationExposure and Cognitive Restructuring
Hope, D. A., Heimberg, R. G., & Turk, C. L. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med-psych/9780190247591.003.0008
Self-citationExposure and Cognitive Restructuring
Hope, D. A., Heimberg, R. G., & Turk, C. L. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med-psych/9780190247591.003.0011
Self-citationExposure and Cognitive Restructuring
Hope, D. A., Heimberg, R. G., & Turk, C. L. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med-psych/9780190247591.003.0007
Self-citationdu Toit, S. A., Schweizer, S., & Wong, Q. J. J. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/yp6qd
Social Anxiety is Related to Worse Recognition Memory of Angry Faces
Keith, A. E., Hamrick, H. C., Judah, M. R., & Zabelina, D. L. (2024) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-024-10162-z
“The Social Interaction Anxiety Scale-Straightforward (SIAS-S; Rodebaugh et al., 2011) is a revised version of the SIAS (Mattick & Clarke, 1998) that excludes the reverse-worded items, which detract from the validity of the total score.”
Ostman, D., & Xethakis, L. J. (2024) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1465304
Levy, J., & Dimidjian, S. (2024) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-024-10555-0
“When excluding the reverse-scored items, the factorial, convergent, and discriminant validity of this measure has consistently been supported (Rodebaugh et al., 2011).”
Computational Attitudes to Drug Discovery in Anxiety
Attri, M., Raghav, A., Vatsha, P., Agrawal, M., Singhal, M., Chaudhary, H., Sahoo, N. K., & Prajapati, B. G. (2025) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781394242474.ch15
Hope, D. A., Heimberg, R. G., & Turk, C. L. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med-psych/9780190247591.002.0008
Self-citationHope, D. A., Heimberg, R. G., & Turk, C. L. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med-psych/9780190247591.002.0011
Self-citationAssessment of Social Anxiety Disorder
Hope, D. A., Heimberg, R. G., & Turk, C. L. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med-psych/9780190247591.005.0001
Self-citation(2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med-psych/9780190247591.002.0006
Hope, D. A., Heimberg, R. G., & Turk, C. L. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med-psych/9780190247591.005.0002
Self-citationHope, D. A., Heimberg, R. G., & Turk, C. L. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med-psych/9780190247591.002.0004
Self-citationHope, D. A., Heimberg, R. G., & Turk, C. L. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med-psych/9780190247591.002.0010
Self-citationSette, S., Coplan, R. J., Ooi, L. L., Zuffianò, A., Xiao, B., Wong, Q. J. J., Rapee, R. M., Oh, W., Liu, J., Kim, Y., et al. (2025) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2025.103092
Gök, B. G., Ișıklı, S., Aslan, S. T., & Demirsöz, T. (2026) · Psychiatric Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11126-025-10245-4
Beeston, O., O’Young, A., Considine, K., & Wong, Q. J. J. (2026) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-026-10301-8
“The Social Interaction Anxiety Scale 17-item straightforward items version (SIAS17; Rodebaugh et al., 2011) assessed anxiety related to social interactions, with items rated on a scale ranging from 0 to 4 and higher sum total scores indicating There were 54 participants who did not report…”
InfluentialFergus, T. A., Tyra, A. T., Ginty, A. T., & Williams, S. E. (2026) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506073.2026.2705534
Zhang, R., & Ding, J. (2026) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.70374
“Approximately 415 undergraduate and graduate students from universities in Beijing, all of Asian descent, were screened using the Fear of Positive Evaluation Scale (FPES) and the Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale–Straightforward Items (BFNE-S).”
InfluentialFaraci, P., & Nasonte, G. (2026) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-026-03163-1
“…et al., 2016 for an empirical demonstration on the Need for Cognition Scale), (b) its internal and exter-nal validity (García-Batista et al., 2021; Rodebaugh et al., 2011), (c) its internal consistency (Roszkowski & Soven, 2010; Vigil-Colet et al., 2020; Zeng et al., 2020), and (d) the overall…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Rodebaugh, T. L., Heimberg, R. G., Brown, P. J., Fernandez, K. C., Blanco, C., Schneier, F. R., & Liebowitz, M. R.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Temple University (US)
- New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rodebaugh, Thomas L.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Anxiety Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 623-630
- ISSN
- 0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3090265
- OpenAlex
- W2002440697
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 14.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (T32AG00030, T32AG000030)
- National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH020004, T32 MH 20004, R01MH064726, K23MH099097, R01MH064481)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- social anxiety, Social Interaction Anxiety Scale, response bias, scale validity, age differences, educational attainment, reference values
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Phobic Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reference Values, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review