Cited by 67Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Should health anxiety be carved at the joint? A look at the health anxiety construct using factor mixture modeling in a non-clinical sample

Asmundson, Gordon J.G., Taylor, Steven, Nicholas Carleton, R., Weeks, Justin W., Hadjstavropoulos, Heather D.·2012·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

Cognitive-behavioral models conceptualize health anxiety as a construct that varies in degree along a continuum rather than existing as nonpathological versus pathological classes or taxons. Only two studies have empirically evaluated the latent structure of health anxiety, both using taxometric statistical methods and both supporting its conceptualization as continuous (Ferguson, 2009; Longley et al., 2010). We sought to further evaluate the latent structure of health anxiety using factor mixture modeling (FMM), which involved a combination of exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and mixture modeling that allowed comparison of models comprising one or more latent classes. Health anxiety symptom data were obtained from the Illness Attitude Scales (IAS) administered to 1768 university undergraduate students. Indicators of health anxiety, derived from EFA of IAS item data, included disease worry, disease conviction, health-related safety behaviors, fear of death, somatic focus, interference due to symptoms, and treatment seeking. FMM of these indicators suggested that health anxiety consists of two classes: (a) an "anxious" class comprising 81.4% of the sample and characterized primarily by somatic focus and interference due to symptoms, and (b) a "nonanxious" class comprising 18.6% of the sample with low scores on all indicators. Contrary to current conceptualizations and taxometric findings, the FMM results indicate the latent structure of health anxiety to be taxonic rather than continuous. Implications for the measurement and conceptualization of health anxiety are discussed and future research directions are highlighted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.11.009

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Asmundson, G. J. G., Taylor, S., Nicholas Carleton, R., Weeks, J. W., & Hadjstavropoulos, H. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Regina (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Ohio University (US)
Corresponding author
Asmundson, Gordon J.G.
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
246-251
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2001585924
Cited by
67
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
health anxiety, fear of illness, taxometric analysis, factor mixture modeling, latent structure, disease conviction, somatic focus, symptom interference, fear of death, cognitive-behavioral model, non-clinical sample
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Attitude to Health, Female, Humans, Hypochondriasis, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review