Cited by 66Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Efficacy of imagery rescripting in treating mental disorders associated with aversive memories - an updated meta-analysis

Open access
Kip, Ahlke, Schoppe, Luisa, Arntz, Arnoud, Morina, Nexhmedin·2023·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

Imagery rescripting (ImRs) is frequently applied to treat different psychological complaints. We conducted an updated meta-analysis based on randomised controlled trials on the efficacy of ImRs for mental disorders associated with aversive memories. Medline, PsycInfo, and Web of Science were searched up to May 2023. Seventeen trials were included with a total of 908 participants (417 in the ImRs condition), suffering from posttraumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorders, depression, or eating disorders. Random effect models yielded an overall effect of g = 0.68 (95 % CI 0.18 to 1.18; k = 7) compared to passive controls (mostly waitlist). The effect compared to (prolonged) exposure, cognitive restructuring, and EMDR was non-significant (g = -0.01; 95 % CI -0.18 to 0.15; k = 11). Follow-up assessments indicated a long-term treatment effect. Results suggest that ImRs can effectively treat a variety of psychological disorders and produce similar treatment effects as evidence-based interventions. Limitations include the bounded number of included trials for each mental disorder. The meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020220696) and received no funding.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102772

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Imagery rescripting is a highly effective evidence-based stand-alone trauma processing technique for post-traumatic stress disorder and a range of other disorders.

    “ImRs is an ST technique that is a highly effective evidence-based stand-alone trauma processing technique for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and a range of other disorders (1–5).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kip, A., Schoppe, L., Arntz, A., & Morina, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Münster (DE)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Kip, Ahlke
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-10
Volume
99
Pages
102772
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386484701
Cited by
66
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 1
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2025-10-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
imagery rescripting, aversive memory, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorders, depression, eating disorders, prolonged exposure, cognitive restructuring, EMDR, treatment efficacy, long-term treatment outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review