CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 62

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spatial thinking in archaeology: Is GIS the answer?

Lock, Gary, Pouncett, John·2017·Journal of Archaeological Science
DOI 10.1016/j.jas.2017.06.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jas.2017.06.002

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gibson and Ingold had less in mind the modelling of archaeological records in relation to the environment than the sociological aspects of the propositional character of the landscape in relation to its organisms.

    “It is rapidly glossed over that Gibson and Ingold had less in mind the modelling of archaeological records in relation to the environment than the sociological aspects of the propositional character of the landscape in relation to its organisms (Llobera 2012; Lock and Pouncett 2017).”

    From From landscape affordances to landscape connectivity: contextualizing an archaeology of human ecology (2020) · cites this paper as Lock and Pouncett 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Bernardini, 2013, Quantifying visual prominence in social landscapes, J. Archaeol. Sci., 40, 3946, 10.1016/j.jas.2013.05.019 · DOI
  2. Cooper, 2011, Mapping the english lake district: a literary GIS, Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr., 36, 89, 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00405.x · DOI
  3. Doran, 1970, Systems theory, computer simulations and archaeology, World Archaeol., 1, 289, 10.1080/00438243.1970.9979448 · DOI
  4. Gillings, 2012, Landscape phenomenology, GIS and the role of affordance, J. Archaeol. Method Theory, 19, 601, 10.1007/s10816-012-9137-4 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Gillings, 1996, Sensuous and reflexive GIS: exploring visualisation and VRML, Internet Archaeol., 1
  6. Goodchild, 1992, Geographical information science, Int. J. GIS, 6, 1
  7. Hacıgüzeller, 2012, GIS, critique, representation and beyond, J. Soc. Archaeol., 2, 245, 10.1177/1469605312439139 · DOI
  8. Hacıgüzeller.P., Gillings, M. and Lock, G. in press. Re-Mapping Archaeology: Critical Perspectives, Alternative Mappings. London: Taylor and Francis.
  9. Huggett, 2004, Archaeology and the new technological fetishism, Archeol. Calcolatori, 15, 81
  10. Ingold, 1993, The temporality of landscape, World Archaeol., 25, 152, 10.1080/00438243.1993.9980235 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Llobera, 2012, Life on a Pixel: challenges in the development of digital methods within an “Interpretive” landscape archaeology framework, J. Archaeol. Method Theory, 19, 495, 10.1007/s10816-012-9139-2 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Lock, 2014, Visibility and movement: towards a GIS-based integrated approach, vol. 23, 23
  13. Lorimer, 2005, Cultural geography: the busyness of being ‘more than representational’, Prog. Hum. Geogr., 29, 83, 10.1191/0309132505ph531pr · DOI
  14. Orengo, 2016, The seeds of commerce: a network analysis-based approach to the Romano-British transport system, J. Archaeol. Sci., 66, 21, 10.1016/j.jas.2015.12.003 · DOI
  15. Pearson, 2006
  16. Reitsma, 2013, Revisiting the “Is GIScience a science?” debate (or quite possibly scientific gerrymandering), Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 27, 211, 10.1080/13658816.2012.674529 · DOI
  17. Schuurman, 1999, Critical GIS: theorizing an emerging science, cartographica: the international journal for geographic information and geovisualization, 36
  18. Slayton.E. n.d. Seascape Corridors: How Modelling Routes Through The Sea Can Illuminate Early Island Culture (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Leiden (to be completed in 2017).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lock, G., & Pouncett, J.
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
84
Pages
129-135
ISSN
0305-4403
DOI
10.1016/j.jas.2017.06.002
Cited by
62
References
10
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review