CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

OSL ages of the Clovis, Late Paleoindian, and Archaic components at Area 15 of the Gault Site, Central Texas, U.S.A.

Rodrigues, K., Rink, W.J., Collins, M.B., Williams, T.J., Keen-Zebert, A., Lόpez, G.I.·2016·Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
DOI 10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.03.014
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.03.014

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Luminescence dating has been used to successfully date archaeological sites in North America such as the Clovis horizon at Pavo Real, Texas, and the Archaic, Paleoindian, and pre-Clovis horizons at the Gault site, Texas.

    “Luminescence dating has also been used to successfully date archaeological sites in North America such as the Clovis horizon at Pavo Real, Texas, and the Archaic, Paleoindian, and pre-Clovis horizons at the Gault site, Texas (12, 14, 15).”

    From Pre-Clovis projectile points at the Debra L. Friedkin site, Texas—Implications for the Late Pleistocene peopling of the Americas (2018) · cites this paper as [14]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Bateman, 2003, Investigations into the potential effect of pedoturbation on luminescence dating, Quat. Sci. Rev., 22, 1169, 10.1016/S0277-3791(03)00019-2 · DOI
  2. Bateman, 2007, Detecting post-depositional sediment disturbance in sandy deposits using optical luminescence, Quat. Geochronol., 2, 57, 10.1016/j.quageo.2006.05.004 · DOI
  3. Bronk Ramsey, 2009, Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates, Radiocarbon, 51, 337, 10.1017/S0033822200033865 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Collins, 2002, The Gault Site, Texas, and Clovis Research, Athena Rev., 3, 31
  5. Diamond, 1987, A framework for plant community classification and conservation in Texas, Tex. J. Sci., 39, 202
  6. Galbraith, 1990, The radial plot: graphical assessment of spread in ages, Nucl. Tracks Radiat. Meas., 17, 207, 10.1016/1359-0189(90)90036-W · DOI
  7. Galbraith, 1999, Optical dating of single and multiple grains of quartz from Jinmium rock shelter, northern Australia: Part 1 Experimental design and statistical models, Archaeometry, 41, 339, 10.1111/j.1475-4754.1999.tb00987.x · DOI
  8. Goodyear, 1982, The chronological position of the Dalton Horizon in the Southeastern United States, Am. Antiq., 47, 382, 10.2307/279909 · DOI
  9. Guérin, 1998, Dose-rate conversion factors: update, Ancient TL, 29, 5, 10.26034/la.atl.2011.443 · DOI
  10. Guérin, 2012, On the use of the infinite matrix assumption and associated concepts: a critical review, Radiat. Meas., 47, 778, 10.1016/j.radmeas.2012.04.004 · DOI
  11. Haynes, 2007, Comment on ‘Redefining the age of Clovis: implications for the peopling of the Americas’, Science, 317, 320, 10.1126/science.1141960 · DOI
  12. Holliday, 2000, The evolution of paleoindian geochronology and typology on the great plains, Geoarchaeology, 15, 227, 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6548(200003)15:3<227::AID-GEA2>3.0.CO;2-A · DOI
  13. Jennings, 2012, Clovis, Folsom, and Midland components at the Debra L. Friedkin site, Texas: context, chronology, and assemblages, J. Archaeol. Sci., 39, 3239, 10.1016/j.jas.2012.05.007 · DOI
  14. Johnson, 1994, A new try at dating and characterizing Holocene climates, as well as Archeological periods, on the Eastern Edwards Plateau, Bull. Tex. Archeol. Soc., 65, 1
  15. Lohse, 2014, Isotope paleoecology of episodic mid-to-late Holocene bison population expansions in the Southern Plains, U.S.A, Quat. Sci. Rev., 102, 14, 10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.07.021 · DOI
  16. Luchsinger, H. M., 2002. Micromorphological Analysis of the Sediments and Soils from the Gault Site, A Clovis Site in Central Texas. Unpublished Masters thesis, Department of Anthropology, Texas A&M University, College Station.
  17. Lόpez, 2008, New quartz optical stimulated luminescence ages for beach ridges on the St. Vincent Island Holocene strandplain, Florida, United States, J. Coast. Res., 24, 49, 10.2112/05-0473.1 · DOI
  18. Murray, 2000, Luminescence dating of quartz using an improved single-aliquot regenerative-dose protocol, Radiat. Meas., 32, 57, 10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00253-X · DOI
  19. Murray, 2003, The single aliquot regenerative dose protocol: potential for improvements in reliability, Radiat. Meas., 37, 377, 10.1016/S1350-4487(03)00053-2 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Prewitt, 1981, Cultural chronology in Central Texas, Bull. Tex. Archeol. Soc., 52, 65
  21. Prewitt, 1985, From Circleville to Toyah: comments on Central Texas chronology, Bull. Tex. Archeol. Soc., 54, 201
  22. Rhodes, 2011, Optically stimulated luminescence dating of sediments over the past 200,000years, Annu. Earth Planet. Sci. Rev., 39, 461, 10.1146/annurev-earth-040610-133425 · DOI
  23. Ricklis, 1994, Toyah components: evidence for occupation in the project area during the latter part of the Late Prehistoric Period, Vol. 1, 1–9, 207
  24. Rink, 1991, Natural alpha recoil particle radiation and ionizing radiation sensitivities in quartz detected with EPR: Implications for geochronometry, Nucl. Tracks Radiat. Meas. D, 18, 163, 10.1016/1359-0189(91)90108-T · DOI
  25. Rink, 2013, Subterranean transport and deposition of quartz by ants in sandy sites relevant to age overestimation in optical luminescence dating, J. Archaeol. Sci., 40, 2217, 10.1016/j.jas.2012.11.006 · DOI
  26. Thoms, 2009, Rocks of ages: propagation of hot-rock cookery in western North America, J. Archaeol. Sci., 36, 573, 10.1016/j.jas.2008.11.016 · DOI
  27. Waters, 2007, Redefining the Age of Clovis: implications for the peopling of the Americas, Science, 315, 1122, 10.1126/science.1137166 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Winkler, 1990, Small mammals from a Holocene sequence in Central Texas and their paleoenvironmental implications, Southwest. Nat., 35, 199, 10.2307/3671542 · DOI
  29. Feathers, 2006, Luminescence dating of sand deposits related to late Pleistocene human occupation at the Cactus Hill Site, Virginia, USA, Quat. Geochronol., 1, 167, 10.1016/j.quageo.2006.05.011 · DOI
  30. Harrison, 1978, Lake Theo: A Stratified, Early Man Bison Butchering andCamp Site, Briscoe County, Texas. Special Archeological Report 1, Canyon, Panhandle-Plains Historical Museum.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rodrigues, K., Rink, W. J., Collins, M. B., Williams, T. J., Keen-Zebert, A., & Lόpez, G. I.
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
7
Pages
94-103
ISSN
2352-409X
DOI
10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.03.014
Cited by
4
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
  • The Gault School of Archaeological Research (0920549)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review