Cited by 207Corporate Social Responsibility ReportingCorporate Finance and GovernancePolitical Influence and Corporate Strategies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does corporate social responsibility reduce the costs of high leverage? Evidence from capital structure and product market interactions

Open access
Bae, Kee-Hong, El Ghoul, Sadok, Guedhami, Omrane, Kwok, Chuck C.Y., Zheng, Ying·2019·Journal of Banking & Finance

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.11.007

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The empirical evidence on the relationship between a firm's ESG/CSR profile and activities and its markets, leadership, ownership characteristics, risk, performance, and value is quite mixed.

    “In particular, the empirical evidence on the relationship between a firm's ESG/CSR profile and activities and its markets, leadership, ownership characteristics, risk, performance, and value is quite mixed.”
  • Prior studies find relationships between a firm's environmental or social qualities and the pricing and risk of its debt.

    “For example, prior studies find relationships between a firm's environmental or social qualities and the pricing and risk of its debt (e.g., Chava (2014), Bae et al. (2019), Kacperczyk and Peydro (2022), Seltzer, Starks, and Zhu (2022)).”

    From Presidential Address: Sustainable Finance and ESG Issues— Value versus Values (2023) · cites this paper as Bae et al. (2019)

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Attig, 2013, Corporate social responsibility and credit ratings, J. Bus. Ethics, 117, 679, 10.1007/s10551-013-1714-2 · DOI
  2. Bae, 2011, Employee treatment and firm leverage: a test of the stakeholder theory of capital structure, J. Financ. Econ., 100, 130, 10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.10.019 · DOI
  3. Bolton, 1990, A theory of predation based on agency problems in financial contracting, Am. Econ. Rev., 80, 93
  4. Campello, 2003, Capital structure and product markets interactions: evidence from business cycles, J. Financ. Econ., 68, 353, 10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00070-9 · DOI
  5. Campello, 2006, Debt financing: does it boost or hurt firm performance in product markets?, J. Financ. Econ., 82, 135, 10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.04.001 · DOI
  6. Chevalier, 1995, Do LBO supermarkets charge more? An empirical analysis of the effects of LBOs on supermarket pricing, J. Finance, 50, 1095, 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb04051.x · DOI
  7. Chevalier, 1996, Capital market imperfections and countercyclical markups: theory and evidence, Am. Econ. Rev., 86, 703
  8. Cronqvist, 2009, Do entrenched managers pay their workers more?, J. Finance, 64, 309, 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01435.x · DOI
  9. Deng, 2013, Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder value maximization: evidence from mergers, J. Financ. Econ., 110, 87, 10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.04.014 · DOI
  10. Di Giuli, 2014, Are red or blue companies more likely to go green? Politics and corporate social responsibility, J. Financ. Econ., 111, 158, 10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.10.002 · DOI
  11. Edmans, 2011, Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices, J. Financ. Econ., 101, 621, 10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.021 · DOI · Paper page
  12. El Ghoul, 2018, Corporate environmental responsibility and the cost of capital: international evidence, J. Bus. Ethics, 149, 335, 10.1007/s10551-015-3005-6 · DOI · Paper page
  13. El Ghoul, 2011, Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital?, J. Bank. Finance, 9, 2388, 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.02.007 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Fama, 1997, Industry costs of equity, J. Financ. Econ., 43, 153, 10.1016/S0304-405X(96)00896-3 · DOI
  15. Ferrell, 2016, Socially responsible firms, J. Financ. Econ., 122, 585, 10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.12.003 · DOI
  16. Flammer, 2015, Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach, Manag. Sci., 61, 2549, 10.1287/mnsc.2014.2038 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Flammer, 2016, The impact of stakeholder orientation on innovation: evidence from a natural experiment, Manag. Sci., 62, 1982, 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2229 · DOI
  18. Giannetti, 2011, What you sell is what you lend? Explaining trade credit contracts, Rev. Financ. Stud., 24, 1261, 10.1093/rfs/hhn096 · DOI
  19. Heinkel, 2001, The effect of green investment on corporate behavior, J. Financ. Quant. Anal., 36, 431, 10.2307/2676219 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Hoberg, 2010, Product market synergies and competition in mergers and acquisitions: a text-based analysis, Rev. Financ. Stud., 23, 3773, 10.1093/rfs/hhq053 · DOI
  21. Hoberg, 2016, Text-based network industries and endogenous product differentiation, J. Polit. Econ., 124, 1423, 10.1086/688176 · DOI
  22. Hong, 2009, The price of sin: the effects of social norms on markets, J. Financ. Econ., 93, 15, 10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.09.001 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Jensen, 1986, Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers, Am. Econ. Rev., 76, 323
  24. Jiao, 2010, Stakeholder welfare and firm value, J. Bank. Finance, 10, 2549, 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.04.013 · DOI
  25. Jo, 2012, The causal effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility, J. Bus. Ethics, 106, 53, 10.1007/s10551-011-1052-1 · DOI
  26. Kini, 2017, Impact of financial leverage on the incidence and severity of product failures: evidence from product recalls, Rev. Financ. Stud., 30, 1790, 10.1093/rfs/hhw092 · DOI
  27. Krüger, 2015, Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth, J. Financ. Econ., 115, 304, 10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.09.008 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Lang, 1992, Contagion and competitive intra-industry effects of bankruptcy announcements: an empirical analysis, J. Financ. Econ., 32, 45, 10.1016/0304-405X(92)90024-R · DOI
  29. Lev, 2010, Is doing good good for you? How corporate charitable contributions enhance revenue growth, Strategic Manag. J., 31, 182, 10.1002/smj.810 · DOI
  30. Lins, 2017, Social capital, trust, and firm performance: the value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis, J. Finance, 72, 1785, 10.1111/jofi.12505 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Lins, 2013, Does family control matter? International evidence from the 2008-2009 financial crisis, Rev. Financ. Stud., 26, 2583, 10.1093/rfs/hht044 · DOI
  32. Maksimovic, 1991, Financial policy and reputation for product quality, Rev. Financ. Stud., 4, 175, 10.1093/rfs/4.1.175 · DOI
  33. Matsa, 2011, Running on empty? Financial leverage and product quality in the supermarket industry, Am. Econ. J., 3, 137
  34. Merton, 1987, A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information, J. Finance, 42, 483, 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1987.tb04565.x · DOI · Paper page
  35. Opler, 1994, Financial distress and corporate performance, J. Finance, 49, 1015, 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb00086.x · DOI · Paper page
  36. Pagano, 2005, Managers, workers, and corporate control, J. Finance, 60, 841, 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00748.x · DOI
  37. Rauch, 1999, Networks versus markets in international trade, J. Int. Econ., 48, 7, 10.1016/S0022-1996(98)00009-9 · DOI
  38. Servaes, 2013, The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: the role of customer awareness, Manag. Sci., 59, 1045, 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1630 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Telser, 1966, Cutthroat competition and the long purse, J. Law Econ., 9, 259, 10.1086/466627 · DOI
  40. Titman, 1984, The effect of capital structure on a firm's liquidation decision, J. Financ. Econ., 13, 137, 10.1016/0304-405X(84)90035-7 · DOI
  41. Waddock, 1997, The corporate social performance-financial performance link, Strategic Manag. J., 18, 303, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.0.CO;2-G · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bae, K.-H., El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C. Y., & Zheng, Y.
Affiliations
  • York University (CA)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • Bryant University (US)
Venue
Journal of Banking & Finance
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
100
Pages
135-150
ISSN
0378-4266 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2611723377
Cited by
207
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 14
FWCI
25.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Banking & Finance (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • Bryant Digital Repository (Bryant University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (435-2017-1223)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Corporate Finance and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Keywords
corporate social responsibility, high leverage, capital structure, product market competition, market share loss, consumer behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review