Cited by 132Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

The relationship between experiential avoidance and the severity of trichotillomania in a nonreferred sample

Begotka, Andrea M., Woods, Douglas W., Wetterneck, Chad T.·2004·Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

Abstract

In this study 436 adults, who reported being diagnosed with trichotillomania (TTM), completed an anonymous survey examining the relationship between experiential avoidance (i.e., escape from or avoidance of unwanted thoughts or emotions) and TTM severity. Results showed a significant positive correlation between measures of experiential avoidance and TTM severity, indicating that more experientially avoidant individuals tended to exhibit more severe TTM. Subsequent analyses found that persons who scored higher on a measure of experiential avoidance reported more frequent and intense urges to pull, were less able to control their urges, and experienced more pulling-related distress than persons who were not experientially avoidant. Conversely, results also showed that individuals who were more experientially avoidant were no more likely to actually pull and were no less successful in actually stopping themselves from pulling than non-avoidant individuals. The results of this study suggest that experiential avoidance may be an important issue in understanding and possibly treating some persons with TTM.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbtep.2004.02.001

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Begotka, A. M., Woods, D. W., & Wetterneck, C. T.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
Corresponding author
Begotka, Andrea M.
Venue
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-03
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
17-24
ISSN
0005-7916 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102461271
Cited by
132
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 11
FWCI
6.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
trichotillomania, experiential avoidance, symptom severity, cognitive behavioral therapy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Avoidance Learning, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Thinking, Trichotillomania, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review