Cited by 141Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

A preliminary investigation of acceptance and commitment therapy and habit reversal as a treatment for trichotillomania

Twohig, Michael P., Woods, Douglas W.·2004·Behavior Therapy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0005-7894(04)80021-2

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Twohig, M. P., & Woods, D. W.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
Corresponding author
Woods, Douglas W.
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
803-820
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072038988
Cited by
141
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
trichotillomania, acceptance and commitment therapy, habit reversal, combination therapy, self-monitoring, hair pulling, treatment acceptability, multiple baseline design, adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review