Cited by 55Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPain Management and Placebo Effect

Cognitive behavioral therapy versus paroxetine in the treatment of hypochondriasis: an 18-month naturalistic follow-up

Greeven, Anja, van Balkom, Anton J.L.M., van der Leeden, Rien, Merkelbach, Jille W., van den Heuvel, Odile A., Spinhoven, Philip·2009·Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

Abstract

Background The present maintenance study investigated whether the reduction in hypochondriacal complaints after initial treatment with CBT or paroxetine sustained during a follow-up period and whether psychiatric severity at pretest predicted the course of hypochondriacal symptoms.Method A naturalistic follow-up period of 18 months after a 16-week RCT consisting of 33 patients initially allocated to a CBT condition and 29 patients to a paroxetine condition. The main outcome measure was the Whiteley Index.Results The initial treatment effect of CBT and paroxetine sustained during the follow-up period. No significant differences between CBT and paroxetine were found. Treatment course could not be predicted by psychiatric comorbidity.Conclusion CBT and paroxetine are both effective treatments for hypochondriasis in the long term.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbtep.2009.06.005

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the larger study (Greeven 2007), improvement persisted to 18 months.

    “and this improvement persisted to 18 months (Greeven 2009).”

    From Health anxiety: Detection and treatment (2018) · cites this paper as Greeven 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greeven, A., van Balkom, A. J. L. M., van der Leeden, R., Merkelbach, J. W., van den Heuvel, O. A., & Spinhoven, P.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
Corresponding author
Greeven, Anja
Venue
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-09
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
487-496
ISSN
0005-7916 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980358513
Cited by
55
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
health anxiety, cognitive behavioral therapy, paroxetine, long-term treatment outcomes, maintenance of treatment effects, psychiatric comorbidity, Whiteley Index, naturalistic follow-up
MeSH terms
Adult, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hypochondriasis, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Severity of Illness Index, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Chi-Square Distribution, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Paroxetine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review