Cited by 108Digital Marketing and Social MediaAuction Theory and ApplicationsTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

Exploring the WOW in online-auction feedback

Weinberg, Bruce D., Davis, Lenita·2005·Journal of Business Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.06.004

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies show that, without any clear ranking, buyers inspect and consider many other detailed pieces of information such as individual-auction level feedback reviews.

    “Indicatively, studies show that, without any clear ranking, buyers “inspect and consider many other detailed pieces of information […] such as individual-auction level feedback reviews” (Weinberg & Davis, 2005: 1619).”

    From Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization (2017) · cites this paper as Weinberg & Davis, 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weinberg, B. D., & Davis, L.
Affiliations
  • Bentley University (US)
  • University of Alabama (US)
Corresponding author
Weinberg, Bruce D.
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-11
Volume
58
Issue
11
Pages
1609-1621
ISSN
0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2151875998
Cited by
108
References
42
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
18.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Business Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Auction Theory and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
online auctions, reputation systems, bidirectionality, purchase decision, eBay

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review