Cited by 261Environmental Sustainability in BusinessEnvironmental Education and SustainabilityReligion, Ecology, and Ethics

Religion and motives for sustainable behaviors: A cross-cultural comparison and contrast

Minton, Elizabeth A., Kahle, Lynn R., Kim, Chung-Hyun·2015·Journal of Business Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.003

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Minton, E. A., Kahle, L. R., & Kim, C.-H.
Affiliations
  • University of Wyoming (US)
  • University of Oregon (US)
  • Sogang University (KR)
Corresponding author
Minton, Elizabeth A.
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
68
Issue
9
Pages
1937-1944
ISSN
0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078854142
Cited by
261
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3
FWCI
48.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Business Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Society for the Scientific Study of Religion
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
Keywords
religion, religiosity, sustainable consumption, sustainable behavior, Buddhists, Christians, atheists, minority religions, cross-cultural comparison, South Korea, United States, self-determination theory, inoculation theory, consumer values, recycling, organic food purchasing, pro-environmental behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review