Cited by 239Big Data and Business IntelligenceBig Data Technologies and ApplicationsInformation Technology Governance and Strategy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 111 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Big data, big decisions: The impact of big data on board level decision-making

Open access

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.029

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 111 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Camillus, 2008, Strategy as a wicked problem, Harvard Business Review, May, 17
  2. Davenport, 2012, How big data is different, MIT Sloan Management Review, 54, 43
  3. Tripsas, 2000, Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging, Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1147, 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1147::AID-SMJ128>3.0.CO;2-R · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Merendino, A., Dibb, S., Meadows, M., Quinn, L., Wilson, D., Simkin, L., & Canhoto, A.
Affiliations
  • Coventry University (GB)
  • The Open University (GB)
  • Brunel University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Merendino, Alessandro
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
93
Pages
67-78
ISSN
0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2889449516
Cited by
239
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 2
FWCI
30.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Business Research (publishedVersion)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Economic and Social Research Council
  • Research Councils UK
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Big Data Technologies and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
Keywords
big data, board of directors, strategic decision-making, cognitive ability, cognitive biases, cognitive overload, knowledge-based view, dynamic capabilities, top management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review