The DOI matches its Crossref record; 112 of the 112 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Demystifying pollution haven hypothesis: Role of FDI
Open accessAbstract
This study explores the interrelationship between FDI, institutional factors, financial development and sustainability by revisiting the pollution haven (or halo) hypotheses. The data is sourced from the World Development Indicators (WDI) database over the period of 1990–2016, covering 21 developed and developing countries with high carbon emissions. The study uses dynamic panel data estimations by applying the generalized method of moments (GMM) and system-generalized methods of moments (Sys-GMM) over sample countries. The results indicate that FDI has a significant positive impact on environmental degradation. There is evidence of pollution haven hypotheses, especially in developing countries. We contribute to existing literature by revisiting the Environment Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis and presenting the effect of FDI on carbon intensity in the light of institutional factors and financial development. The findings relating to FDI, institutional factors and financial development may cause researchers and policymakers to reiterate the sustainability dimension of foreign capital inflows in both developed and developing countries. We propose the policy framework to include a mandatory Statement of Environmental Disclosures for both listed and unlisted home and host companies at the time of their origin, expansion and fund raising in order to achieve sustainable business goals (SBGs).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2297968 · Cited by 33,272
Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(98)00009-8 · Cited by 22,571
Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models
Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-d · Cited by 19,880
Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1995) · Working Paper Series · doi:10.1920/wp.ifs.1995.9517 · Cited by 14,755
Economic growth and the environment
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118443 · Cited by 9,901
Frankel, J. A., & Romer, D. (1999) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.89.3.379 · Cited by 5,384
Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey
Dinda, S. (2004) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.011 · Cited by 4,106
Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance
Wintoki, M. B., Linck, J. S., & Netter, J. M. (2012) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.03.005 · Cited by 3,005
Dynamic panel data models: a guide to micro data methods and practice
Bond, S. R. (2002) · Portuguese Economic Journal · doi:10.1007/s10258-002-0009-9 · Cited by 2,559
North-South Trade and the Environment
Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (1994) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118421 · Cited by 1,946
Metadata
- Authors
- Singhania, M., & Saini, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-02
- Volume
- 123
- Pages
- 516-528
- ISSN
- 0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3093896469
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 112
- FWCI
- 33.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Demystifying pollution haven hypothesis: Role of FDI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.007
- The paper
- Singhania, M., & Saini, N. (2021). Demystifying pollution haven hypothesis: Role of FDI. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.