Cited by 443Educational Games and GamificationTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourDigital Marketing and Social Media

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 128 of the 130 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enhancing user engagement: The role of gamification in mobile apps

Open access
Bitrián, Paula, Buil, Isabel, Catalán, Sara·2021·Journal of Business Research

Abstract

Organizations are increasingly making use of gamification to enhance users’ engagement with their mobile apps. However, more research into the mechanisms that facilitate user engagement and its consequences is needed. Drawing on the self-system model of motivational development, this study investigates how gamification might foster user engagement and positive marketing outcomes. Data from 276 users of a mobile gamified app were analyzed using partial least squares regression. The results showed that gamification increases user engagement through satisfaction of the needs for competence, autonomy and relatedness. User engagement, in turn, leads to greater intention to use, disseminate WOM about, and to positively rate, the app. Finally, this study provides a number of theoretical and practical implications that can help developers design more effective gamified mobile apps.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.028

Cites

128 of 128 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 130 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bitrián, P., Buil, I., & Catalán, S.
Affiliations
Universidad de Zaragoza (ES)
Corresponding author
Bitrián, Paula
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-08
Volume
132
Pages
170-185
ISSN
0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3159451509
Cited by
442
References
130
Citations by year
2026: 81 · 2025: 126 · 2024: 97 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 9
FWCI
85.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Business Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zaguan (Universidad de Zaragoza) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Regional Development Fund
  • Government of Spain Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities
  • Government of Aragon
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Digital Marketing and Social Media
Keywords
gamification, mobile application, user engagement, self-determination theory, autonomy, competence, relatedness, satisfaction, intention to use, word of mouth, app ratings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review