Cited by 102Technology Adoption and User BehaviourWork-Family Balance ChallengesEmployer Branding and e-HRM

The adoption of remote work platforms after the Covid-19 lockdown: New approach, new evidence

Open access
Sahut, Jean Michel, Lissillour, Raphael·2023·Journal of Business Research

Abstract

With the aim of providing further insights into the driving factors influencing behavioral intentions and expectations to use remote work after the Covid-19 lockdown, this study draws on an enhanced version of the technology acceptance model to analyze the determinants and moderating factors of remote work platform use. From an analysis of quantitative data collected from questionnaires and qualitative data from interviews with employees of Chinese firms in the service sector, we conclude that post-lockdown adoption of remote work is explained by three main variables: behavioral intention, behavioral expectation and facilitating conditions, but demographic characteristics and factors related to the specific features of remote work all nevertheless moderate the relationships in our model. In addition to gender, the generational gap and behavioral tendency should be taken into consideration to improve employee acceptance rates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113345

Cites

83 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Trust serves as a mitigating factor for privacy concerns.

    “Trust also serves as a mitigating factor for privacy concerns [65,66]”

    From Unraveling the Determinants of Platform Economy Adoption in Developing Countries: An Extended Application of the UTAUT2 Model with a Privacy Calculus Perspective (2023) · cites this paper as [66]

    The Research methodology section says the interviews examined both privacy and trust, but does not describe trust as mitigating privacy concerns. The Discussion identifies privacy as a concern, while the Qualitative data analysis links trust to perceived efficiency instead. Searches for trust mitigating privacy concerns and for a trust–privacy relationship found no passage establishing the claimed effect. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 86 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1994). Advanced topics in structural equation models. Bagozzi RP (ed) Advanced methods of marketing research. Blackwell, Oxford, 1–51.
  2. Chapman A. Sheehy N. Heywood S. The organizational implications of teleworking International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 10 1995 229 248
  3. Hair J. Bush R. Ortinau D. Marketing Research 4th ed. 2008 McGraw Hill/Irwin New York, NY
  4. Mokhtarian P.L. Bagley M.N. Salomon I. The impact of gender, occupation, and presence of children on telecommuting motivations and constraints Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49 12 1998 1115 1134
  5. Scholefield G. Peel S. Managers’ attitudes to teleworking, New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations 34 3 2009 1 13
  6. Schreiber P.J. The Nature of Career Development for Women Who Telecommute, Unpublished doctoral thesis 1999 University of Georgia
  7. Tomaskovic-Devey D. Risman B. Telecommuting innovation and organization: A contingency theory of labor process change Social Science Quarterly 74 2 1993 367 385
  8. Tremblay D.G. Genin E. The demand for telework of IT self-employed workers The Journal of E-working 1 2 2007 98 115

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sahut, J. M., & Lissillour, R.
Affiliations
IPAG Business School (FR)
Corresponding author
Sahut, Jean Michel
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-01
Volume
154
Pages
113345
ISSN
0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4298008082
Cited by
102
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 21
FWCI
17.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Business Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
Keywords
remote work, technology adoption, technology acceptance model, behavioral intention, behavioral expectations, facilitating conditions, moderators, demographic differences, intergenerational differences, gender differences, service employees

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review