Cited by 4,043Psychometric Methodologies and TestingTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourBusiness Strategies and Management Research

An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research

Hair, Joe, Hollingsworth, Carole L., Randolph, Adriane B., Chong, Alain Yee Loong·2017·Industrial Management & Data Systems

Abstract

Purpose: Following the call for awareness of accepted reporting practices by Ringle, Sarstedt, and Straub in 2012, the purpose of this paper is to review and analyze the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in Industrial Management & Data Systems ( IMDS ) and extend MIS Quarterly ( MISQ ) applications to include the period 2012-2014. Design/methodology/approach: Review of PLS-SEM applications in information systems (IS) studies published in IMDS and MISQ for the period 2010-2014 identifying a total of 57 articles reporting the use of or commenting on PLS-SEM. Findings: The results indicate an increased maturity of the IS field in using PLS-SEM for model complexity and formative measures and not just small sample sizes and non-normal data. Research limitations/implications: Findings demonstrate the continued use and acceptance of PLS-SEM as an accepted research method within IS. PLS-SEM is discussed as the preferred SEM method when the research objective is prediction. Practical implications: This update on PLS-SEM use and recent developments will help authors to better understand and apply the method. Researchers are encouraged to engage in complete reporting procedures. Originality/value: Applications of PLS-SEM for exploratory research and theory development are increasing. IS scholars should continue to exercise sound practice by reporting reasons for using PLS-SEM and recognizing its wider applicability for research. Recommended reporting guidelines following Ringle et al. (2012) and Gefen et al. (2011) are included. Several important methodological updates are included as well.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/imds-04-2016-0130

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B., & Chong, A. Y. L.
Affiliations
  • University of South Alabama (US)
  • Kennesaw State University (US)
  • University of Nottingham Ningbo China (CN)
Venue
Industrial Management & Data Systems
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2017-04-10
Volume
117
Issue
3
Pages
442-458
ISSN
0263-5577 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2595629513
Cited by
4,043
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 549 · 2025: 794 · 2024: 738 · 2023: 638 · 2022: 510 · 2021: 334 · 2020: 264 · 2019: 147 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2
FWCI
114.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Industrial Management & Data Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Business Strategies and Management Research
Keywords
partial least squares structural equation modeling, PLS-SEM, information systems research, reporting guidelines, model complexity, small sample size, non-normal data, MIS Quarterly

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review