CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 166

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Organizational capabilities and institutional pressures in the adoption of circular economy

Castro-Lopez, Adrian, Iglesias, Victor, Santos-Vijande, María Leticia·2023·Journal of Business Research
DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113823
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Are companies adopting circular economy strategies or are they just adopting specific circular practices? To what extent are external pressures and organizational capabilities effective in driving these changes? To answer these questions, we propose and test a model that allows for analyzing the differentiated effects of institutional pressures (mimetic, coercive, and social) and organizational agility on the adoption of a circular business model at a strategic level and on the implementation of specific circular practices (in product innovation, production, and recycling). The results obtained on a sample of 218 manufacturing firms show that institutional pressures and organizational agility drive changes at a strategic level in companies, and these changes are ultimately reflected in specific circular practices. Organizational capabilities have a stronger influence on changes in circular product innovation and production, whereas external pressures have a higher impact on changes in recycling processes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113823

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 72

  1. Alsaad, 2022, Linking business intelligence with the performance of new service products: Insight from a dynamic capabilities perspective, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7, 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100262 · DOI
  2. Anderson, 1988, Structural equation modelling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach, Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411, 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Armstrong, 1977, Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys, Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 396, 10.1177/002224377701400320 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Arranz, 2022, Institutional pressures as drivers of circular economy in firms: A machine learning approach, Journal of Cleaner Production, 355, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131738 · DOI
  5. Bag, 2022, Effect of eco-innovation on green supply chain management, circular economy capability, and performance of small and medium enterprises, Journal of Business Research, 141, 60, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.011 · DOI
  6. Bag, 2021, Role of institutional pressures and resources in the adoption of big data analytics powered artificial intelligence, sustainable manufacturing practices and circular economy capabilities, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120420 · DOI
  7. Bocken, 2016, Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy, Journal of industrial and production engineering, 33, 308, 10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Boulding K. (1966). The economy of the coming spaceship earth, In: H. Daly, W.H. Freeman (Eds.), Economics, Ecology, Ethics: Essay towards a Steady State Economy. San Francisco, USA.
  9. Boutry, 2021, Institutional drivers of environmental innovation: Evidence from French industrial firms, Journal of Innovation Economics Management, 34, 135
  10. Cainelli, 2020, Resource efficient eco-innovations for a circular economy: Evidence from EU firms, Research Policy, 49, 10.1016/j.respol.2019.103827 · DOI
  11. Centobelli, 2020, Designing business models in circular economy: A systematic literature review and research agenda, Business Strategy and the Environment, 29, 1734, 10.1002/bse.2466 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Centobelli, 2021, Determinants of the transition towards circular economy in SMEs: A sustainable supply chain management perspective, International Journal of Production Economics, 242, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108297 · DOI
  13. Chari, 2022, Dynamic capabilities for circular manufacturing supply chains—Exploring the role of Industry 4.0 and resilience, Business Strategy and the Environment, 31, 2500, 10.1002/bse.3040 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Chen, 2012, Effects of interaction and entrepreneurial orientation on organizational performance: Insights into market driven and market driving, Industrial Marketing Management, 41, 1019, 10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.01.017 · DOI
  15. Chen, 2012, Origins of green innovations: The differences between proactive and reactive green innovations, Management Decision, 50, 368, 10.1108/00251741211216197 · DOI
  16. Colombo, 2004, Delegation of authority in business organizations: an empirical test, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 52, 53, 10.1111/j.0022-1821.2004.00216.x · DOI
  17. Covin, 2019, Crafting high-impact entrepreneurial orientation research: Some suggested guidelines, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43, 3, 10.1177/1042258718773181 · DOI
  18. DiMaggio, 1983, The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields, American Sociological Review, 48, 147, 10.2307/2095101 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Do, 2022, An extended institutional theory perspective on the adoption of circular economy practices: Insights from the seafood industry, International Journal of Production Economics, 247, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108400 · DOI
  20. Dubey, 2016, Towards a theory of sustainable consumption and production: Constructs and measurement, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 106, 78, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.11.008 · DOI
  21. Ervasti, 2016, A global, comprehensive review of literature related to paper recycling: A pressing need for a uniform system of terms and definitions, Waste Management, 48, 64, 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.11.020 · DOI
  22. Ferasso, 2020, Circular economy business models: The state of research and avenues ahead, Business Strategy and the Environment, 29, 3006, 10.1002/bse.2554 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Fernández de Arroyabe, 2021, The development of CE business models in firms: The role of circular economy capabilities, Technovation, 102292
  24. Frishammar, 2019, Circular business model transformation: A roadmap for incumbent firms, California Management Review, 61, 5, 10.1177/0008125618811926 · DOI
  25. Galatti, 2022, Circular economy indicators for measuring social innovation in the Brazilian textile and fashion industry, Journal of Cleaner Production, 363, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132485 · DOI
  26. Geissdoerfer, 2020, Circular business models: A review, Journal of Cleaner Production, 277, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123741 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Govindan, 2022, Circular economy adoption barriers: An extended fuzzy best–worst method using fuzzy DEMATEL and Supermatrix structure, Business Strategy and the Environment, 31, 1566, 10.1002/bse.2970 · DOI
  28. Guo, 2022, How to innovate continuously? Conceptualizing generative capability, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7, 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100177 · DOI
  29. Gusmerotti, 2019, Drivers and approaches to the circular economy in manufacturing firms, Journal of Cleaner Production, 230, 314, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.044 · DOI
  30. Hair, 2014, Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research, European business review, 26, 106, 10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Hair, 2011, PLS-SEM: Indeed, a silver bullet, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19, 139, 10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Hair, 2019, When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM, European business review, 31, 2, 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. and Sinkovics, R. (2009), The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In Sinkovics, R.R. and Ghauri, P.N. (Eds), New Challenges to International Marketing (Advances in International Marketing, Vol. 20), Emerald, Bingley, pp. 277-319. · DOI
  34. Hannan, 1984, Structural inertia and organizational change, American sociological review, 149, 10.2307/2095567 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Huang, 2022, Exploring institutional pressures, firm green slack, green product innovation and green new product success: Evidence from Taiwan's high-tech industries, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121196 · DOI
  36. Jabbour, 2020, Stakeholders, innovative business models for the circular economy and sustainable performance of firms in an emerging economy facing institutional voids, Journal of Environmental Management, 264
  37. Kalverkamp, 2018, Automotive remanufacturing in the circular economy in Europe: Marketing system challenges, Journal of Macromarketing, 38, 112, 10.1177/0276146717739066 · DOI
  38. Khan, 2021, Sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring: Key capabilities and organizational routines for circular economy implementation, Journal of Cleaner Production, 287, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125565 · DOI
  39. Khan, 2022, Analyzing cause and effect relationships among drivers and barriers to circular economy implementation in the context of an emerging economy, Journal of Cleaner Production, 364, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132618 · DOI
  40. Khizar, 2022, Addressing the conceptualization and measurement challenges of sustainability orientation: A systematic review and research agenda, Journal of Business Research, 142, 718, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.029 · DOI
  41. Klein, 2021, Facilitating business model innovation: The influence of sustainability and the mediating role of strategic orientations, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38, 271, 10.1111/jpim.12563 · DOI
  42. Korhonen, 2018, Circular economy: The concept and its limitations, Ecological Economics, 143, 37, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Lewandowski, M. (2016). Designing the business models for circular economy—Towards the conceptual framework. Sustainability, 8(1), 1–28, 43. · DOI
  44. López-Sánchez, 2022, Key capabilities for frugal innovation in developed economies: Insights into the current transition towards sustainability, Sustainability Science, 17, 191, 10.1007/s11625-021-01071-1 · DOI
  45. Lu, 2011, Understanding the link between information technology capability and organizational agility: An empirical examination, MIS Quarterly, 35, 931, 10.2307/41409967 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Malik, 2022, Circular economy adoption by SMEs in emerging markets: Towards a multilevel conceptual framework, Journal of Business Research, 142, 605, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.076 · DOI
  47. Mathivathanan, 2022, Drivers of circular economy for small and medium enterprises: Case study on the Indian state of Tamil Nadu, Journal of Business Research, 149, 997, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.06.007 · DOI
  48. Miroshnychenko, 2021, Absorptive capacity, strategic flexibility, and business model innovation: Empirical evidence from Italian SMEs, Journal of Business Research, 130, 670, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.015 · DOI
  49. Mishra, 2022, Barriers to the adoption of circular economy practices in Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises: Instrument development, measurement and validation, Journal of Cleaner Production, 351, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131389 · DOI
  50. Naqshbandi, 2022, The linkage between open innovation, absorptive capacity and managerial ties: A cross-country perspective, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7, 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100167 · DOI
  51. Nussholz, 2018, A circular business model mapping tool for creating value from prolonged product lifetime and closed material loops, Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 185, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.112 · DOI
  52. Oliver, 1991, Strategic responses to institutional processes, Academy of Management Review., 16, 145, 10.2307/258610 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Padilla-Rivera, 2020, Addressing the social aspects of a circular economy: A systematic literature review, Sustainability, 12, 7912, 10.3390/su12197912 · DOI
  54. Prieto-Sandoval, 2019, Key strategies, resources, and capabilities for implementing circular economy in industrial small and medium enterprises, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26, 1473, 10.1002/csr.1761 · DOI
  55. Reim, 2021, Circular business model implementation: A capability development case study from the manufacturing industry, Business Strategy and the Environment, 30, 2745, 10.1002/bse.2891 · DOI
  56. Saidani, 2017, How to assess product performance in the circular economy? Proposed requirements for the design of a circularity measurement framework, Recycling, 2, 6, 10.3390/recycling2010006 · DOI
  57. Salandri, 2022, Green practices and operational performance: The moderating role of agility, Journal of Cleaner Production, 375, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134091 · DOI
  58. Santa-Maria, 2022, The Circular Sprint: Circular business model innovation through design thinking, Journal of Cleaner Production, 362, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132323 · DOI
  59. Santos-Vijande, 2022, Role of innovation and architectural marketing capabilities in channelling entrepreneurship into performance, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7, 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100174 · DOI
  60. Scarpellini, 2020, Dynamic capabilities and environmental accounting for the circular economy in businesses, Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11, 1129, 10.1108/SAMPJ-04-2019-0150 · DOI
  61. Shams, 2021, Strategic agility in international business: A conceptual framework for “agile” multinationals, Journal of International Management, 27, 10.1016/j.intman.2020.100737 · DOI
  62. Stewart, 2018, Circular economy in corporate sustainability strategies: A review of corporate sustainability reports in the fast-moving consumer goods sector, Business Strategy and the Environment, 27, 1005, 10.1002/bse.2048 · DOI
  63. Sun, 2022, The (In-)congruence effect of exploitative and explorative capabilities on firm performance, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7, 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100260 · DOI
  64. Suzanne, 2020, Towards circular economy in production planning: Challenges and opportunities, European Journal of Operational Research, 287, 168, 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.04.043 · DOI
  65. Takalo, 2021, Green innovation: A systematic literature review, Journal of Cleaner Production, 279
  66. Teece, 2016, Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy, California Management Review, 58, 13, 10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Tura, 2019, Unlocking circular business: A framework of barriers and drivers, Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, 90, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.202 · DOI
  68. Urbinati, 2017, Towards a new taxonomy of circular economy business models, Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 487, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.047 · DOI
  69. Winans, 2017, The history and current applications of the circular economy concept, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68, 825, 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.123 · DOI
  70. Witjes, 2016, Towards a more Circular Economy: Proposing a framework linking sustainable public procurement and sustainable business models, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 112, 37, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.04.015 · DOI · Paper page
  71. Zhang, 2021, Multi-dimensional circular supply chain management: A comparative review of the state-of-the-art practices and research, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 155, 10.1016/j.tre.2021.102509 · DOI · Paper page
  72. Zhou, 2019, The relationship between marketing agility and financial performance under different levels of market turbulence, Industrial Marketing Management, 83, 31, 10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.11.008 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 166

Metadata

Authors
Castro-Lopez, A., Iglesias, V., & Santos-Vijande, M. L.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-06
Volume
161
Pages
113823
ISSN
0148-2963
DOI
10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113823
Cited by
166
References
5
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
  • Gobierno de España Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (PID2019-105726RB-I00)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review