Cited by 414Digital Economy and TransformationInnovation and Knowledge ManagementDigital Innovation in Industries

How do digital capabilities affect firm performance? The mediating role of technological capabilities in the “new normal

Open access
Heredia, Jorge, Castillo-Vergara, Mauricio, Geldes, Cristian, Carbajal Gamarra, Felix M., Flores, Alejandro, Heredia, Walter·2022·Journal of Innovation & Knowledge

Abstract

This study proposes a model to explain the effect of digital capabilities on firm performance in the “new normal” context from a firm-level perspective. Moreover, it analyzes the mediating role of technological capabilities and the Human Development Index (HDI) in explaining firm performance. Our study used data from the World Bank's Enterprise Surveys 2020, which included 999 firms from 27 countries. We applied the methodological approach, partial least square structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), to test the hypothetical model. The results show that digital capabilities positively influence firm performance only through technological capabilities. We also empirically demonstrate that digital skills in low HDI economies have a more significant indirect effect on firm performance than in high HDI countries. Finally, some promising avenues for future research and implications for managers and policymakers are suggested based on these findings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100171

Cites

96 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies have linked digital capabilities with performance gains across private companies in areas such as improved efficiency, customer satisfaction, and profitability.

    “While studies have linked digital capabilities with performance gains across private companies in areas such as improved efficiency, customer satisfaction, and profitability (Benitez et al. 2022; Heredia et al. 2022), public administration scholarship lacks clear understanding of how such capabilities shape outcomes specifically within governmental contexts (de Magalh ã es Santos 2023).”

    From How Do Digital Capabilities Affect Organizational Performance in the Public Sector? The Mediating Role of the Organizational Agility (2024) · cites this paper as Heredia et al. 2022

    The Discussion (page not available) says digital capabilities improve firm performance through technological capabilities, and the Introduction links digital tools to more efficient processes. But the paper’s firm-performance indicators are changes in demand and sales; our copy does not establish gains in customer satisfaction or profitability. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • GIT acceptance plays a significant role in making firms sustainable.

    “We conclude that GIT acceptance plays a significant role in making firms sustainable (Heredia et al., 2022).”

    From Sustainable entrepreneurship and knowledge management: Role of green information technology in building sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems (2025) · cites this paper as Heredia et al., 2022

    The Conclusions discuss digital capabilities and firm performance, not GIT acceptance or whether it makes firms sustainable. A green IT adoption study appears in the References, but our copy does not report the claimed relationship. Searched for GIT acceptance, green IT, and firm sustainability. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bell, M., & Pavitt, K. (1995). THE DEVELOPMENT OF TECHNOLOGICAL CAPABILITIES. I.U. HAQUE, TRADE, TECHNOLOGY AND INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS EDI DEVELOPMENT STUDIES: 22 (pp. 69-101). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
  2. Chin, W. W. (2010). Handbook of partial least squares. In V. E. Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, H. Wang (Eds.), HANDBOOK OF PARTIAL LEAST SQUARE: CONCEPTS, METHODS AND APPLICATIONS IN MARKETING AND RELATED FIELDS (pp. 655-690). Berling: Springer.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heredia, J., Castillo-Vergara, M., Geldes, C., Carbajal Gamarra, F. M., Flores, A., & Heredia, W.
Affiliations
  • University of the Pacific (PE)
  • Universidad del Desarrollo (CL)
Corresponding author
Heredia, Jorge
Venue
Journal of Innovation & Knowledge
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-04
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
100171
ISSN
2444-569X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4214861923
Cited by
414
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 80 · 2025: 96 · 2024: 119 · 2023: 88 · 2022: 31
FWCI
62.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Innovation & Knowledge (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Economy and Transformation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Digital Innovation in Industries
Keywords
digital capabilities, firm performance, technological capabilities, Human Development Index, digital skills, mediating effect, new normal, post-pandemic economy, firm-level analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review