CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 66

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Will users fall in love with ChatGPT? a perspective from the triangular theory of love

Chen, Qian, Jing, Yufan, Gong, Yeming, Tan, Jie·2025·Journal of Business Research
DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114982
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The phenomenon of human-ChatGPT emotional interaction has become increasing. This study aims to address whether users will fall in love with ChatGPT and to uncover the antecedents and underlying mechanisms. Based on the social-technical framework and the triangular theory of love, we examine the attributes tied to ChatGPT and the inherent processes that influence the emotional dependence of users. Through a survey and data analysis of 466 users who have engaged in emotional interactions with ChatGPT, we find that three ChatGPT’s emotional intelligence factors and two emotional companionship factors positively influence the factors of the love triangle and are associated with users’ emotional dependence on it. The findings also suggest that users with an anxious attachment personality are predisposed to develop an emotional dependency on ChatGPT. This study innovatively explores the phenomenon of human–machine romantic relationships in the context of ChatGPT, revealing the underlying mechanisms of human–machine romantic relationships. It enriches the research on human–machine romantic relationships and extends the Love Triangle Theory. Additionally, we capture the unique emotional interaction features of ChatGPT, providing practical significance for the design and development of future artificial intelligence products based on ChatGPT.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114982

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 88

  1. Acker, 1992, Intimacy, Passion and Commitment in Adult Romantic Relationships: A Test of the Triangular Theory of Love, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 21, 10.1177/0265407592091002 · DOI
  2. Alessa, A., & Al-Khalifa, H. (2023). Towards Designing a ChatGPT Conversational Companion for Elderly People. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, 667–674. · DOI
  3. Androutsopoulou, 2019, Transforming the communication between citizens and government through AI-guided chatbots, Government Information Quarterly, 36, 358, 10.1016/j.giq.2018.10.001 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Araujo, 2018, Living up to the chatbot hype: The influence of anthropomorphic design cues and communicative agency framing on conversational agent and company perceptions, Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 183, 10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.051 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Armstrong, 1977, Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys, Journal oF Marketing Research, 14, 396, 10.1177/002224377701400320 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Arntz, 2005, Pathological dependency: Distinguishing functional from emotional dependency, Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 12, 411
  7. Aron, 1995, Falling in love: Prospective studies of self-concept change, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1102, 10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1102 · DOI
  8. Aron, 1996, Dimensions of the Prototype of Love, Ournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 535, 10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.535 · DOI
  9. Bacchini, 2017, Identity formation in adolescent and emerging adult regular players of massively multiplayer online role-playing games (MMORPG), Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 191, 10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.045 · DOI
  10. Batra, 2012, Brand love, Journal of Marketing, 76, 1, 10.1509/jm.09.0339 · DOI
  11. Baumeister, 1999, Passion, Intimacy, and Time: Passionate Love as a Function of Change in Intimacy, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 49, 10.1207/s15327957pspr0301_3 · DOI
  12. Bostrom, 1977, MIS Problems and Failures: A Socio-Technical Perspective, Part I: The Causes. MIS Quarterly, 1, 17
  13. Bostrom, 1977, MIS Problems and Failures: A Socio-Technical Perspective, Part II: The Application of Socio-Technical Theory, MIS Quarterly, 1, 11, 10.2307/249019 · DOI
  14. Bügel, 2011, Customer intimacy and commitment to relationships with firms in five different sectors: Preliminary evidence, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 18, 247, 10.1016/j.jretconser.2010.11.005 · DOI
  15. Charlton, 2002, A factor-analytic investigation of computer ‘addiction’ and engagement, British Journal of Psychology, 93, 329, 10.1348/000712602760146242 · DOI
  16. Chen, 2021, Preventing relapse to information technology addiction through weakening reinforcement: A self-regulation perspective, Information & Management, 58, 10.1016/j.im.2021.103485 · DOI
  17. Chen, 2022, Classifying and measuring the service quality of AI chatbot in frontline service, Journal of Business Research, 145, 552, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.088 · DOI
  18. Chen, 2020, The Moderating Role of State Attachment Anxiety and Avoidance Between Social Anxiety and Social Networking Sites Addiction, Psychological Reports, 123, 633, 10.1177/0033294118823178 · DOI
  19. Clark, 1988, Interpersonal Processes in Close Relationships, Annual review of psychology, 39, 609, 10.1146/annurev.ps.39.020188.003141 · DOI
  20. Collins, N. L., & Feeney, B. C. (2004). An attachment theory perspective on closeness and intimacy. In Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 163–187).
  21. Collins, 1990, Adult Attachment, Working Models, and Relationship Quality in Dating Couples, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 633, 10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.644 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Crolic, 2022, Blame the Bot: Anthropomorphism and Anger in Customer-Chatbot Interactions, Journal of Marketing, 86, 132, 10.1177/00222429211045687 · DOI
  23. David, 2021, Investigating the impact of partner phubbing on romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction: The moderating role of attachment anxiety, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38, 3590, 10.1177/0265407521996454 · DOI
  24. Lee, 2017, The chatbot feels you—A counseling service using emotional response generation, IEEE International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BigComp), 2017, 437
  25. Du, 2021, Paradoxes of artificial intelligence in consumer markets: Ethical challenges and opportunities, Journal of Business Research, 129, 961, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.024 · DOI
  26. El-Ansary, 1972, Power measurement in the distribution channel, Journal of Marketing research, 9, 47, 10.1177/002224377200900110 · DOI
  27. Formosa, 2022, Need satisfaction, passion and wellbeing effects of videogame play prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic, Computers in Human Behavior, 131, 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107232 · DOI
  28. Fu, 2015, Career commitment of information technology professionals: The investment model perspective, Information & Management, 52, 537, 10.1016/j.im.2015.03.005 · DOI
  29. Grimes, 2021, Mental models and expectation violations in conversational AI interactions, Decision Support Systems, 144, 10.1016/j.dss.2021.113515 · DOI
  30. Hall, 2015, The Importance of Starting Right: The Influence of Accurate Intuition on Performance in Salesperson-Customer Interactions, Journal of Marketing, 79, 91, 10.1509/jm.13.0505 · DOI
  31. Huang, 2012, How Attachment Affects the Strength of Peer Influence on Adolescent Consumer Behavior, Psychology & Marketing, 29, 558, 10.1002/mar.20543 · DOI
  32. Jiang, 2022, AI-powered chatbot communication with customers: Dialogic interactions, satisfaction, engagement, and customer behavior, Computers in Human Behavior, 134, 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107329 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Jiang, 2023, Make chatbots more adaptive: Dual pathways linking human-like cues and tailored response to trust in interactions with chatbots, Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107485 · DOI
  34. Jin, 2010, Mobile Communication in Romantic Relationships: Mobile Phone Use, Relational Uncertainty, Love, Commitment, and Attachment Styles, Communication Reports, 23, 39, 10.1080/08934211003598742 · DOI
  35. Johnson, 2021, Need satisfaction, passion, empathy and helping behaviour in videogame play, Computers in Human Behavior, 122, 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106817 · DOI
  36. Kao, 2020, Looking at both sides of relationship dynamics in virtual communities: A social exchange theoretical lens, Information & Management, 57, 10.1016/j.im.2019.103210 · DOI
  37. Kim, 2023, Anthropomorphic response: Understanding interactions between humans and artificial intelligence agents, Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107512 · DOI
  38. Kim, 2022, Human likeness and attachment effect on the perceived interactivity of AI speakers, Journal of Business Research, 144, 797, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.047 · DOI
  39. Kim, 2017, Obtaining a better understanding about travel-related purchase intentions among senior users of mobile social network sites, International Journal of Information Management, 37, 484, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.04.006 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Klaus, 2020, AI voice bots: A services marketing research agenda, Journal of Services Marketing, 34, 389, 10.1108/JSM-01-2019-0043 · DOI
  41. Kong, 2020, In Sharing Economy We Trust: Examining the Effect of Social and Technical Enablers on Millennials’ Trust in Sharing Commerce, Computers in Human Behavior, 108, 10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.017 · DOI
  42. Kordzadeh, 2022, Algorithmic bias: Review, synthesis, and future research directions, European Journal of Information Systems, 31, 388, 10.1080/0960085X.2021.1927212 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Krishen, 2019, Social media networking satisfaction in the US and Vietnam: Content versus connection, Journal of Business Research, 101, 93, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.046 · DOI
  44. Langner, 2015, Is It Really Love? A Comparative Investigation of the Emotional Nature of Brand and Interpersonal Love, Psychology & Marketing, 32, 624, 10.1002/mar.20805 · DOI
  45. Lee, 2022, Artificial intelligent chatbots as brand promoters: A two-stage structural equation modeling-artificial neural network approach, Internet Research, 32, 1329, 10.1108/INTR-01-2021-0030 · DOI
  46. Lee, 2013, The role of attachment style in building social capital from a social networking site: The interplay of anxiety and avoidance, Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1499, 10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.012 · DOI
  47. Li, 2021, What makes you continuously use chatbot services? Evidence from chinese online travel agencies, Electronic Markets, 31, 575, 10.1007/s12525-020-00454-z · DOI
  48. Madey, 2009, The Effect of Attachment and Sternberg’s Triangular Theory of Love on Relationship Satisfaction, Individual Differences Research, 7, 76
  49. Maduku, 2023, Assessing customer passion, commitment, and word-of-mouth intentions in digital assistant usage: The moderating role of technology anxiety, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 71, 10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103208 · DOI
  50. Mayer, 1999, The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment, Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 123, 10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.123 · DOI
  51. McKinney, 2002, The Measurement of Web-Customer Satisfaction: An Expectation and Disconfirmation Approach, Information systems research, 13, 296, 10.1287/isre.13.3.296.76 · DOI
  52. McLean, 2021, Alexa, do voice assistants influence consumer brand engagement? – Examining the role of AI powered voice assistants in influencing consumer brand engagement, Journal of Business Research, 124, 312, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.045 · DOI
  53. Mende, 2011, Why Attachment Security Matters: How Customers’ Attachment Styles Influence Their Relationships With Service Firms and Service Employees, Journal of Service Research, 14, 285, 10.1177/1094670511411173 · DOI
  54. Mende, 2013, Decoding Customer-Firm Relationships: How Attachment Styles Help Explain Customers’ Preferences for Closeness, Repurchase Intentions, and Changes in Relationship Breadth, Journal of Marketing Research, 50, 125, 10.1509/jmr.10.0072 · DOI
  55. Mende, 2019, The marketing of love: How attachment styles affect romantic consumption journeys, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47, 255, 10.1007/s11747-018-0610-9 · DOI
  56. Mikulincer, M., & Florian, V. (1998). The relationship between adult attachment styles and emotional and cognitive reactions to stressful events. In Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 143–165). The Guilford Press.
  57. Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2010). The Attachment Behavioral System: Basic Concepts and Principles. Attachment in Adulthood, First Edition: Structure, Dynamics, and Change (pp. 3–28). Guilford Publications.
  58. Ngwenyama, 1997, Communication Richness in Electronic Mail: Critical Social Theory and the Contextuality of Meaning, MIS Quarterly, 21, 145, 10.2307/249417 · DOI
  59. Øverup, 2016, Self-presentation as a function of perceived closeness and trust with romantic partners, friends, and acquaintances, The Journal of Social Psychology, 156, 630, 10.1080/00224545.2016.1152215 · DOI
  60. Pal, 2023, What affects the usage of artificial conversational agents? An agent personality and love theory perspective, Computers in Human Behavior, 145, 10.1016/j.chb.2023.107788 · DOI
  61. Ramadan, 2021, “Alexafying” shoppers: The examination of Amazon’s captive relationship strategy, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 62, 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102610 · DOI
  62. Rauschnabel, 2014, You’re so lovable: Anthropomorphism and brand love, Journal of Brand Management, 21, 372, 10.1057/bm.2014.14 · DOI
  63. Rietz, T., Benke, I., & Maedche, A. (2019, February). The Impact of Anthropomorphic and Functional Chatbot Design Features in Enterprise Collaboration Systems on User Acceptance. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, Siegen.
  64. Ruggieri, 2021, Electronic surveillance in the couple: The role of self-efficacy and commitment, Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106577 · DOI
  65. Ruijten, 2021, The similarity-attraction paradigm in persuasive technology: Effects of system and user personality on evaluations and persuasiveness of an interactive system, Behaviour & Information Technology, 40, 734, 10.1080/0144929X.2020.1723701 · DOI
  66. Sarkar, A., Narváez, A., & Harting, J. (2012). Optimization of Chaotic Micromixers Using Finite Time Lyapunov Exponents. In W. E. Nagel, D. B. Kröner, & M. M. Resch (Eds.), High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering ’11 (pp. 325–336). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. · DOI
  67. Shimp, 1988, Consumer-object relations: A conceptual framework based analogously on Sternberg’s triangular theory of love, Advances in Consumer Research, 15, 163
  68. Shumanov, 2021, Making conversations with chatbots more personalized, Computers in Human Behavior, 117, 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106627 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Simpson, 1999, When Accuracy Hurts: Reactions of Anxious-Ambivalent Dating Partners to a Relationship-Threatening Situation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 754, 10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.754 · DOI
  70. Simpson, 2011, Attachment and the Management of Empathic Accuracy in Relationship-Threatening Situations, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 242, 10.1177/0146167210394368 · DOI
  71. Song, 2022, Can people experience romantic love for artificial intelligence? An empirical study of intelligent assistants, Information & Management, 59, 10.1016/j.im.2022.103595 · DOI · Paper page
  72. Stănculescu, 2023, Anxious Attachment and Facebook Addiction: The Mediating Role of Need to Belong, Self-esteem, and Facebook Use to Meet Romantic Partners, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 21, 333, 10.1007/s11469-021-00598-9 · DOI
  73. Tabrani, 2018, Trust, commitment, customer intimacy and customer loyalty in Islamic banking relationships, International Journal of Bank Marketing, 36, 823, 10.1108/IJBM-03-2017-0054 · DOI · Paper page
  74. Tam & Ho, 2006, Understanding the Impact of Web Personalization on User Information Processing and Decision Outcomes, MIS Quarterly, 30, 865, 10.2307/25148757 · DOI · Paper page
  75. Turel, 2020, An intertwined perspective on technology and digitised individuals: Linkages, needs and outcomes, Information Systems Journal, 30, 929, 10.1111/isj.12304 · DOI
  76. Wang, 2010, Adult Attachment; Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identity; and Sexual Attitudes of Nonheterosexual Individuals, Journal of College Counseling, 13, 31, 10.1002/j.2161-1882.2010.tb00046.x · DOI
  77. Wang, Z., Xie, Q., Ding, Z., Feng, Y., & Xia, R. (2023). Is ChatGPT a Good Sentiment Analyzer? A Preliminary Study. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.04339. · arXiv
  78. Watson, 1998, Measuring Information Systems Service Quality: Lessons from Two Longitudinal Case Studies, MIS Quarterly, 22, 61, 10.2307/249678 · DOI
  79. Wu, 2020, Social media opinion summarization using emotion cognition and convolutional neural networks, International Journal of Information Management, 51, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.07.004 · DOI
  80. Xie, 2022, Does Artificial Intelligence Satisfy You? A Meta-Analysis of User Gratification and User Satisfaction with AI-Powered Chatbots, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 40, 613, 10.1080/10447318.2022.2121458 · DOI
  81. Xie, 2023, Friend, mentor, lover: Does chatbot engagement lead to psychological dependence?, Journal of Service Management, 34, 806, 10.1108/JOSM-02-2022-0072 · DOI · Paper page
  82. Yang, 2023, Towards Interpretable Mental Health Analysis with ChatGPT, Retrieved from
  83. Yu, 2016, A socio-technical analysis of factors affecting the adoption of smart TV in Korea, Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 89, 10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.099 · DOI
  84. Zhang, 2023, Tools or peers? Impacts of anthropomorphism level and social role on emotional attachment and disclosure tendency towards intelligent agents, Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107415 · DOI
  85. Zhang, 2022, How to retain customers: Understanding the role of trust in live streaming commerce with a socio-technical perspective, Computers in Human Behavior, 127, 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107052 · DOI
  86. Zhao, 2023, Is ChatGPT Equipped with Emotional Dialogue Capabilities?, Retrieved from
  87. Zheng, 2013, The impacts of information quality and system quality on users’ continuance intention in information-exchange virtual communities: An empirical investigation, Decision Support Systems, 56, 513, 10.1016/j.dss.2012.11.008 · DOI
  88. Zhou, 2012, Attracted to or Locked In? Predicting Continuance Intention in Social Virtual World Services, Journal of Management Information Systems, 29, 273, 10.2753/MIS0742-1222290108 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chen, Q., Jing, Y., Gong, Y., & Tan, J.
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-01
Volume
186
Pages
114982
ISSN
0148-2963
DOI
10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114982
Cited by
66
References
19
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • American Institute of Mathematics
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (72371112)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review