Cited by 30Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionMental Health via Writing

Measuring self and rules in what people say: exploring whether self-discrimination predicts long-term wellbeing

Atkins, Paul W.B., Styles, Robert G.·2016·Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcbs.2016.05.001

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Atkins, P. W. B., & Styles, R. G.
Affiliations
  • Australian Catholic University (AU)
  • Australian National University (AU)
Corresponding author
Atkins, Paul W.B.
Venue
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
71-79
ISSN
2212-1447 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2367912331
Cited by
30
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2
FWCI
5.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
self-discrimination, self-government, self-as-context, well-being, relational frame theory, word discrimination, psychological flexibility, identity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review