Cited by 34Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsResilience and Mental HealthCOVID-19 and Mental Health

What makes us strong: Conceptual and functional comparisons of psychological flexibility and resilience

Jo, Duckhyun, Pyo, Sohwi, Hwang, Yoobin, Seung, Yumi, Yang, Eunjoo·2024·Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100798

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jo, D., Pyo, S., Hwang, Y., Seung, Y., & Yang, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • Korea University (KR)
Corresponding author
Yang, Eunjoo
Venue
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-07
Volume
33
Pages
100798
ISSN
2212-1447 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400015638
Cited by
34
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3
FWCI
17.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
psychological flexibility, resilience, mental health outcomes, network analysis, COVID-19 pandemic, protective factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review