Cited by 76Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMental Health Treatment and AccessAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Psychological inflexibility and stigma: A meta-analytic review

Krafft, Jennifer, Ferrell, Jillian, Levin, Michael E., Twohig, Michael P.·2018·Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcbs.2017.11.002

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krafft, J., Ferrell, J., Levin, M. E., & Twohig, M. P.
Affiliations
Utah State University (US)
Corresponding author
Krafft, Jennifer
Venue
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
7
Pages
15-28
ISSN
2212-1447 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2765683470
Cited by
76
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
psychological inflexibility, stigma, acceptance and commitment therapy, stigma reduction, mediating and moderating effects, long-term outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review