Cited by 16Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDigital Mental Health Interventions

The understanding and managing adult ADHD programme: A qualitative evaluation of online psychoeducation with acceptance and commitment therapy for adults with ADHD

Open access
Seery, Christina, Leonard-Curtin, Aisling, Naismith, Lauren, King, Nora, Kilbride, Ken, Wrigley, Margo, Boyd, Christine, McHugh, Louise +1 more·2023·Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

Abstract

Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a new and emerging area that may be helpful for adults with ADHD in promoting psychological well-being. The Understanding and Managing Adult ADHD Programme (UMAAP) is an online intervention that combines psychoeducation with ACT. Forty-nine participants provided qualitative feedback on their experiences through open-ended questions in an online survey distributed after they completed UMAAP. Thematic analysis was used to develop four themes. ‘An epiphany of awareness’ and ‘accepting and affirming ADHD’ highlighted the intervention's outcomes and showed UMAAP appears to increase self-acceptance and understanding of ADHD. ‘Too much for an introductory programme’ suggested that UMAAP could be overwhelming for some participants, while ‘the nature of being an online intervention’ explored the costs and benefits of being conducted online. Overall, participants experienced psychoeducation with ACT as positively impacting their outlook of themselves and their relationship with their thoughts and behaviours. Findings also highlight elements that may need to be adapted to better suit adults with ADHD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcbs.2023.08.005

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Acceptance and Commitment Therapy has demonstrated preliminary effectiveness in improving self-compassion in adults with ADHD.

    “Incorporating self‐compassion frameworks could replenish this psychological resource, which is commonly depleted in individuals with ADHD (Beaton et al. 2022b), such as Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, which has demonstrated preliminary effectiveness in improving self‐compassion in adults with ADHD (Seery et al. 2023, 2024).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 64 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seery, C., Leonard-Curtin, A., Naismith, L., King, N., Kilbride, K., Wrigley, M., Boyd, C., McHugh, L., & Bramham, J.
Affiliations
  • University College Dublin (IE)
  • Health Service Executive (IE)
Corresponding author
Seery, Christina
Venue
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-07
Volume
29
Pages
254-263
ISSN
2212-1447 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386170392
Cited by
16
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2
FWCI
4.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Irish Research Council (GOIP/2021/1223)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
adult ADHD, acceptance and commitment therapy, online psychoeducation, self-acceptance, participant experiences, online intervention, psychological well-being, intervention adaptation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review