The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Life-cycle energy analysis of prefabricated building components: an input–output-based hybrid model
Open accessAbstract
As an effective strategy for improving the productivity of the construction industry, prefabricated construction has attracted concerns worldwide. This study investigated the life-cycle energy use of prefabricated components and the corresponding effect on the total embodied energy use for a number of real building projects. Result showed that the life-cycle energy use of prefabricated components ranged from 7.33 GJ/m3 for precast staircase to 13.34 GJ/m3 for precast form. The recycling process could achieve 16%–24% energy reduction. This study also found that apart from reusability, energy savings are also obtained from waste reduction and high quality control, saving 4%–14% of the total life-cycle energy consumption. All these advantages can be regarded as important environment friendly strategies provided by precast construction. The linear regression analysis indicated that the average increment in energy use was nearly linearly correlated with prefabrication rate. Precast facade and form are identified as energy-intensive components compared with the conventional construction method. Therefore, the challenge lies in improving the integrality and quality of the prefabrication technique while reducing its dependence on energy-intensive materials. Besides, attention should be focused on improving the maturity of the precast market to avoid additional energy consumption during prophase investigation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
System Boundary Selection in Life-Cycle Inventories Using Hybrid Approaches
Suh, S., Lenzen, M., Treloar, G. J., Hondo, H., Horvath, A., Huppes, G., Jolliet, O., Klann, U., Krewitt, W., Moriguchi, Y., et al. (2004) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0263745 · Cited by 1,025
Assessing the End-of-Life Impacts of Buildings
Vieira, P. S., & Horvath, A. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es071345l · Cited by 95
Cited by
Oesterreich, T. D., & Teuteberg, F. (2016) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2016.09.006 · Cited by 1,526
Barriers to promoting prefabricated construction in China: A cost–benefit analysis
Hong, J., Shen, G. Q., Li, Z., Zhang, B., & Zhang, W. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.171 · Cited by 503
Self-citationLi, C. Z., Xue, F., Li, X., Hong, J., & Shen, G. Q. (2018) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2018.01.001 · Cited by 420
Self-citationA holistic review of off-site construction literature published between 2008 and 2018
Jin, R., Gao, S., Cheshmehzangi, A., & Aboagye-Nimo, E. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.195 · Cited by 363
Wang, M., Wang, C. C., Sepasgozar, S., & Zlatanova, S. (2020) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings10110204 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Hong, J., Shen, G. Q., Mao, C., Li, Z., & Li, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 112
- Pages
- 2198-2207
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1748265057
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Life-cycle energy analysis of prefabricated building components: an input–output-based hybrid model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.030
- The paper
- Hong, J., Shen, G. Q., Mao, C., Li, Z., & Li, K. (2016). Life-cycle energy analysis of prefabricated building components: an input–output-based hybrid model. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.