The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Selective recovery of valuable metals from spent lithium-ion batteries – Process development and kinetics evaluation
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Recovery of valuable metals from spent lithium-ion battery (LIB) is of both environmental and economic importance. Acidic leaching usually encounters issues of low selectivity or slow kinetics with considerable secondary waste generation during further purification. In this research, a closed-loop process with improved leaching selectivity for recycling of spent LiNixCoyMn1-x-yO2 battery using weak acidic leachant was demonstrated. To obtain optimal conditions of the leaching process, the effects of acid concentration, solid to liquid (S/L) ratio, temperature and reductant content were systematically investigated. Almost all Co, Li, Mn and Ni could be effectively recovered into the solution while Al remained in the residue as metallic form, after one-step leaching. The role of reductant during leaching was further evaluated which was found to be critical for the leaching kinetics. It is clear that the addition of reductant could alter the rate-controlling step of leaching from the ion diffusion in the residue layer to the surface chemical reactions. With high selectivity against impurities, this research proposed and verified a process to recover high purity Li2CO3 from the cathode scrap of LIBs, and more than 90% of the global recovery rate of valuable metals can be achieved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Xin, Y., Guo, X., Chen, S., Wang, J., Wu, F., & Xin, B. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.001 · Cited by 306
Cited by
Toward sustainable and systematic recycling of spent rechargeable batteries
Zhang, X., Li, L., Fan, E., Xue, Q., Bian, Y., Wu, F., & Chen, R. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00297e · Cited by 1,038
Self-citationLithium-ion batteries – Current state of the art and anticipated developments
Armand, M., Axmann, P., Bresser, D., Copley, M., Edström, K., Ekberg, C., Guyomard, D., Lestriez, B., Novák, P., Petranikova, M., et al. (2020) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228708 · Cited by 888
Or, T., Gourley, S. W. D., Kaliyappan, K., Yu, A., & Chen, Z. (2020) · Carbon Energy · doi:10.1002/cey2.29 · Cited by 559
Golmohammadzadeh, R., Faraji, F., & Rashchi, F. (2018) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.024 · Cited by 478
Selective recovery of lithium from spent lithium iron phosphate batteries: a sustainable process
Yang, Y., Meng, X., Cao, H., Lin, X., Liu, C., Sun, Y., Zhang, Y., & Sun, Z. (2018) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c7gc03376a · Cited by 459
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gao, W., Song, J., Cao, H., Lin, X., Zhang, X., Zheng, X., Zhang, Y., & Sun, Z.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 178
- Pages
- 833-845
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2783014490
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selective recovery of valuable metals from spent lithium-ion batteries – Process development and kinetics evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.040
- The paper
- Gao, W., Song, J., Cao, H., Lin, X., Zhang, X., Zheng, X., Zhang, Y., & Sun, Z. (2018). Selective recovery of valuable metals from spent lithium-ion batteries – Process development and kinetics evaluation. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.040
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
