Cited by 58Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen RemovalWastewater Treatment and ReuseAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production

Performance of moving bed biofilm reactor using effective microorganisms

Safwat, Safwat M.·2018·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.041

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Safwat, S. M.
Affiliations
Cairo University (EG)
Corresponding author
Safwat, Safwat M.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
185
Pages
723-731
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2790232528
Cited by
58
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Keywords
moving bed biofilm reactor, effective microorganisms, activated sludge inoculation, COD removal, ammonium removal, hydraulic shock loading, biofilm thickness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review