Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 312

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Towards circular economy in mining: Opportunities and bottlenecks for tailings valorization

Kinnunen, Päivi H.-M., Kaksonen, Anna H.·2019·Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract

Abstract Current management of mining waste is based on linear economy thinking. However, the use of mining waste as a raw material resource can be one solution to the limited metal supply. The objective of this study was to fill in the knowledge gaps of business opportunities, drivers, needs and barriers for tailings valorization, since the transformation towards a circular economy needs advancements in understanding these factors. Based on a workshop and theme interviews, the utilization of tailings in the mining industry is currently in its infancy, but there is clear raw material potential for the future. The handling of sidestreams at mine sites depends on mine lifecycle. The identified opportunities and drivers were categorized under the circular economy mindset, technological, environmental, institutional and economic drivers. The needs were new value chains, technology development, the decrease in the amount of waste, stability, taxation, and predictability of regulation. Challenges and bottlenecks were categorized under new value chains, technological, environmental, institutional, economic and knowledge bottlenecks. The identified needs and barriers need to be properly addressed to speed up the transformation towards the circular economy in the mining industry.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.171

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Bascetin, 2016, New technologies on mine process tailing disposal, J. Geol. Res. Eng., 2, 63
  2. do Carmo, 2017, Fundão tailings dam failures: the environment tragedy of the largest technological disaster of Brazilian mining in global context, Persp. Ecol. Conserv., 15, 145
  3. Chen, 2016, Review of ecological restoration technology for mine tailings in China, Eng. Rev., 36, 115
  4. Kaksonen, 2007, Sulfate reduction based bioprocesses for acid mine drainage treatment and metal recovery, Eng. Life Sci., 7, 541, 10.1002/elsc.200720216 · doi:10.1002/elsc.200720216
  5. Karaca, 2017, Acid pond sediment and mine tailings contaminated with metals: physicochemical characterization and electrokinetic remediation, Environ. Earth. Sci., 76, 408, 10.1007/s12665-017-6736-0 · doi:10.1007/s12665-017-6736-0
  6. Lèbre, 2017, The role of the mining industry in a circular economy. A framework for resource management at the mine site level, J. Ind. Ecol., 0, 1
  7. Li, 2018, Investigation on the recovery of gold and silver from cyanide tailings using chlorination roasting process, J. Alloy. Comp., 763, 241, 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.05.298 · doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.05.298
  8. Liu, 2013, Recovery of gold and iron from the cyanide tailings by magnetic roasting, Rare Metal Mater. Eng., 42, 1805, 10.1016/S1875-5372(14)60009-6 · doi:10.1016/s1875-5372(14)60009-6
  9. Metals X Limited, 2017, Renison tailings retreatment project (“Rentails”) updated DFS confirms high margin project, ASX release, 4, 7
  10. Oliveira, 2011, Recovery of apatite from flotation tailings, Separ. Purif. Technol., 79, 79, 10.1016/j.seppur.2011.03.015 · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2011.03.015
  11. Schoenberger, 2016, Environmentally sustainable mining: the case of tailings storage facilities, Resour. Pol., 49, 119, 10.1016/j.resourpol.2016.04.009 · doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2016.04.009
  12. Vardanyan, 2018, Recovery of valuable metals from polymetallic mine tailings by natural microbial consortium, Environ. Technol.
  13. Wang, 2014, Current state of fine mineral tailings treatment: a critical review on theory and practice, Min. Eng., 58, 113, 10.1016/j.mineng.2014.01.018 · doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2014.01.018
  14. Zhao, 2012, Discussion on the model of mining circular economy, Energy Procedia, 16, 438, 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.01.071 · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2012.01.071
  15. van Zyl, 2016, Waste not, want not - rethinking the tailings and mine waste issue, AusImm Bull.

Cited by

See all 312

Metadata

Authors
Kinnunen, P. H.-M., & Kaksonen, A. H.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
228
Pages
153-160
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2936863259
Cited by
312
References
28
FWCI
20.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Funders
  • Academy of Finland (306079)
  • CSIRO Land and Water and CSIRO Mineral Resources

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards circular economy in mining: Opportunities and bottlenecks for tailings valorization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.171
The paper
Kinnunen, P. H.-M., & Kaksonen, A. H. (2019). Towards circular economy in mining: Opportunities and bottlenecks for tailings valorization. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.171

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.