The DOI matches its Crossref record; 119 of the 119 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recycling of spent lithium-ion batteries in view of lithium recovery: A critical review
Abstract
Abstract Due to the rapid expanding of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs), hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) and electric vehicles (EVs), the projectfed demand for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is huge and might result in supply risks for natural lithium-containing reserves. After the service life, spent LIBs continuously accumulate in the market, and they are excellent secondary resources for lithium recovery. To alleviate resource shortage and to decrease potential environmental pollution caused by improper solid waste disposal, recycling of spent LIBs is motivated world widely in recent years. Previous studies have usually focused on the recovery of cobalt and nickel, which create high economic benefit. Recovery of lithium, however, has not been highlighted. In this article, state-of-the-art on spent LIBs recycling is discussed with emphasis on lithium recovery. In addition to understanding underlying mechanisms and physiochemistry features of various recycling methods, the possibility for industrial realization of each method is also evaluated. The complex processing steps limit the industrial implementation of hydrometallurgy-dominant methods, which usually reclaim lithium in the last step, resulting in a poor recovery efficiency of lithium. The pyrometallurgy-dominant approach is readily to scale up but lithium is lost in the slag phase. Therefore, the mild recycling (cleaner production) methods are recommended for future study since they take advantages of traditional pyrometallurgy and hydrometallurgy, and could decrease treatment temperature as well as acid/alkaline usage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries
Tarascon, J.-M., & Armand, M. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35104644 · Cited by 21,130
Challenges for Rechargeable Li Batteries
Goodenough, J. B., & Kim, Y. (2010) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm901452z · Cited by 10,943
The Li-Ion Rechargeable Battery: A Perspective
Goodenough, J. B., & Park, K.-S. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja3091438 · Cited by 9,962
Nonaqueous Liquid Electrolytes for Lithium-Based Rechargeable Batteries
Xu, K. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr030203g · Cited by 7,437
Li-ion battery materials: present and future
Nitta, N., Wu, F., Lee, J. T., & Yushin, G. (2015) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2014.10.040 · Cited by 7,389
Lithium Batteries: Status, Prospects and Future
Scrosati, B., & Garche, J. (2010) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.048 · Cited by 5,153
LixCoO2 (0<x<-1): A new cathode material for batteries of high energy density
Mizushima, K., Jones, P. C., Wiseman, P. J., & Goodenough, J. B. (1980) · Materials Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/0025-5408(80)90012-4 · Cited by 3,856
Optimized LiFePO[sub 4] for Lithium Battery Cathodes
Yamada, A., Chung, S. C., & Hinokuma, K. (2001) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1348257 · Cited by 1,867
Lithium insertion into manganese spinels
Thackeray, M. M., David, W. I. F., Bruce, P. G., & Goodenough, J. B. (1983) · Materials Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/0025-5408(83)90138-1 · Cited by 1,778
Recovery and recycling of lithium: a review
Swain, B. (2017) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2016.08.031 · Cited by 1,713
Cited by
Neumann, J., Petranikova, M., Meeus, M., Gamarra, J. D., Younesi, R., Winter, M., & Nowak, S. (2022) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202102917 · Cited by 805
Lai, X., Chen, Q., Tang, X., Zhou, Y., Gao, F., Guo, Y., Bhagat, R., & Zheng, Y. (2022) · eTransportation · doi:10.1016/j.etran.2022.100169 · Cited by 566
Tabelin, C. B., Dallas, J., Casanova, S., Pelech, T., Bournival, G., Saydam, S., & Canbulat, I. (2021) · Minerals Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2020.106743 · Cited by 533
A review on the recycling of spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) by the bioleaching approach
Roy, J. J., Cao, B., & Madhavi, S. (2021) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130944 · Cited by 346
Wang, L., Wang, X., & Yang, W. (2020) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115328 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, C., Lin, J., Cao, H., Zhang, Y., & Sun, Z.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-08
- Volume
- 228
- Pages
- 801-813
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2940986572
- Cited by
- 789
- References
- 119
- FWCI
- 45.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recycling of spent lithium-ion batteries in view of lithium recovery: A critical review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.304
- The paper
- Liu, C., Lin, J., Cao, H., Zhang, Y., & Sun, Z. (2019). Recycling of spent lithium-ion batteries in view of lithium recovery: A critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.304
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.