The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Circular economy transition in Italy. Achievements, perspectives and constraints
Abstract
Abstract This study evaluates the transition to CE in Italy on a sample of 292 organizations after introducing a brief overview of the main principles of CE (reduction, repair, reuse, recover, remanufacturing, recycling) as well as how they are implemented at macro level. With regard to the sample we analysed the data related to the circular business models adopted by the selected organizations, with also a focus on CE implementation at the meso levels given that it also entails the adoption of cooperation strategies between companies. The results point out that several types of organizations (companies for profit and non-profit, research centres/universities) are involved in the transition to CE with different sizes (small, medium and large) and economic sector’s specializations. Recycling resulted to be, among the so called 6R practical framework, the preferred practice of most of the organizations involved over the whole supply chain, from the collection of post-consumption waste to the recovery, recycling and production of secondary raw materials. The other “principles” such as repair, reuse, remanufacturing are progressing well, mainly within small companies, where several laboratories deal with the reuse of products and their selling in second hand shops, or in the recovery and redistribution of food surplus and the remanufacturing of personal computers. The “reuse”, in particular, has constantly increased in the last five years thanks to the on-line sales. Some companies also deal with the dissemination of the CE culture (by means of different channels such as cultural events, actions and best practices to avoid plastic abuse, repair cafes, urban regeneration and urban mining projects) that includes the diffusion of all its principles and concepts such as in particular the prevention and reduction of waste and the maintenance of the value of products. In that, such companies and their activities provide with the opportunity of shifting the concept of CE beyond the current social political debate centred on recycling. Hopefully, this will contribute to unlock and promote the preventive vision of the CE.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007 · Cited by 6,536
Self-citationProduct design and business model strategies for a circular economy
Bocken, N. M. P., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016) · Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering · doi:10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124 · Cited by 4,002
Circular economy: The concept and its limitations
Korhonen, J., Honkasalo, A., & Seppälä, J. (2018) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041 · Cited by 3,961
Towards circular economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry
Lieder, M., & Rashid, A. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042 · Cited by 2,762
I NDUSTRIAL S YMBIOSIS : Literature and Taxonomy
Chertow, M. R. (2000) · Annual Review of Energy and the Environment · doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.313 · Cited by 1,917
Barriers to the Circular Economy: Evidence From the European Union (EU)
Kirchherr, J., Piscicelli, L., Bour, R., Kostense-Smit, E., Muller, J., Huibrechtse-Truijens, A., & Hekkert, M. (2018) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028 · Cited by 1,903
Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: a systematic review
Klewitz, J., & Hansen, E. G. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.017 · Cited by 1,435
A review of the circular economy in China: moving from rhetoric to implementation
Su, B., Heshmati, A., Geng, Y., & Yu, X. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.020 · Cited by 1,429
Allenby, B., & Graedel, T. E. (1995) · Cited by 1,192
Haas, W., Krausmann, F., Wiedenhofer, D., & Heinz, M. (2015) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12244 · Cited by 1,154
Cited by
Upcycling and catalytic degradation of plastic wastes
Hou, Q., Zhen, M., Qian, H., Nie, Y., Bai, X., Xia, T., Laiq Ur Rehman, M., Li, Q., & Ju, M. (2021) · Cell Reports Physical Science · doi:10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100514 · Cited by 335
Circular Economy Models in Agro-Food Systems: A Review
Hamam, M., Chinnici, G., Di Vita, G., Pappalardo, G., Pecorino, B., Maesano, G., & D’Amico, M. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13063453 · Cited by 234
Accorsi, R., Baruffaldi, G., & Manzini, R. (2020) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2020.06.014 · Cited by 96
Examining the role of procurement 4.0 towards remanufacturing operations and circular economy
Bag, S., Dhamija, P., Gupta, S., & Sivarajah, U. (2021) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2020.1817602 · Cited by 94
A Critical Review of the Role of Repair Cafés in a Sustainable Circular Transition
Moalem, R. M., & Mosgaard, M. A. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132212351 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghisellini, P., & Ulgiati, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 243
- Pages
- 118360
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2976900045
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 51.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Circular economy transition in Italy. Achievements, perspectives and constraints. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118360
- The paper
- Ghisellini, P., & Ulgiati, S. (2020). Circular economy transition in Italy. Achievements, perspectives and constraints. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118360
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.