A Critical Review of the Role of Repair Cafés in a Sustainable Circular Transition
Open accessAbstract
Extending the useful life of consumer products is a critical element in the circular economy. Although commercial repair is an established part of the global economy, the repair is often conducted informally. This means that non-commercial repair ecosystems exist, including the international network of repair cafés, spreading worldwide to over 2000 repair cafés in 37 countries (April 2021). As the first review on this topic, this article investigates and gains more knowledge about repair cafés, and critically assesses their role as a sustainability initiative, i.e., how the concept may translate into a broader sustainability context. A systematic literature review (2010–2020) was conducted, including 44 articles in descriptive and content analyses. The bibliometric data revealed an increase in the number of publications on repair cafés, particularly over the last four years, indicating that repair cafés as a research topic have started to gain attention, and this is likely to grow in numbers. However, the significant number of different places of publication indicates that this is not (yet) a well-established field with defined research channels. The content analysis revealed that the concept has spread to a range of different contexts, beyond the original scope, influencing the mindset and acts of a broad field of practitioners. This indicates a wide range of possibilities for the expansion of the concept of repair cafés, bringing different expectations on calling into question the future role of repair cafés. However, the aims of the people involved in repair cafés span from the altruistic and strategic, over personal gains, to critical consumer, financial and educational aims. This may challenge repair cafés’ future role(s), i.e., ambitions set by the international organisation of repair cafés. Notably, the ambition for actors at the micro-level is to feed in data on repair and achieve ‘collaborative repair’, as the aims of the people involved are complex, and their expectations lack alignment, both vertically and horizontally.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Community repair initiatives-repair cafés, shared tool libraries, and peer-to-peer skill transfer platforms-build the collective competence and social infrastructure that individual consumers lack, particularly for technically complex products.
“Community repair initiatives-repair cafés, shared tool libraries, and peer-to-peer skill transfer platforms-build the collective competence and social infrastructure that individual consumers lack, particularly for technically complex products [3,14,21].”
From Designing for Repair and Extended Lifespan: Consumer Expectations and Economic Constraints (2026) · cites this paper as [14]
The paper’s “Pedagogical Aspects of Repair Movements” and “Strengthening Social Cohesion” sections say repair cafés develop local technical skills through skill-sharing and provide a place for people to meet. “Service Aspects” says they provide tools and know-how, but distinguishes repair cafés from other sharing platforms. The paper does not establish that shared tool libraries or peer-to-peer platforms have the same effects, or that those effects are particularly strong for technically complex products. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPositive community-based initiatives, such as repair cafés, can help overcome barriers to repair, particularly for electronic products.
“Positive community-based initiatives, such as the repair café movement that began in the Netherlands, show how shared repair practices can help overcome these barriers, particularly for electronic products [14].”
From Designing for Repair and Extended Lifespan: Consumer Expectations and Economic Constraints (2026) · cites this paper as [14]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 63 · Cited by 65
Research works printed but not linked: 61
- Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Towards the Circular Economy: Economic and Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition. Available online: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/publications/Ellen-MacArthur-Foundation- Towards-the-Circular-Economy-vol.1.pdf (accessed on 21 June 2020).
- Cooper, T. Policies for longevity. In Longer Lasting Products. Alternatives to the Throwaway Society; Cooper, T., Ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 2010. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- King, A.M.; Burgess, S.C.; Ijomah, W.; McMahon, C.A. Reducing waste: Repair, recondition, remanufacture or recycle? Sustain. Dev. 2006, 14, 257-267. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Lechner, G.; Wagner, M.J.; Tena, A.D.; Fleck, C.; Reimann, M. Exploring a regional repair network with a public funding scheme for customer repairs: The 'GRAZ repariert'-case. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 288, 125588. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Ghisellini, P.; Ulgiati, S. Circular economy transition in Italy. Achievements, perspectives and constraints. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 243, 118360. [CrossRef] · DOI
- van der Velden, M. 'Fixing the World One Thing at a Time': Community repair and a sustainable circular economy. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 304, 127151. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Dewberry, E.; Sheldrick, L.; Sinclair, M.; Moreno, M.; Makatsoris, C. Developing scenarios for product longevity and sufficiency. Prod. Lifetimes Environ. 2017, 108-113. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Rosner, D.K. Making Citizens, Reassembling Devices: On Gender and the Development of Contemporary Public Sites of Repair in Northern California. Public Cult. 2014, 26, 51-77. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Routledge. Designing for the Circular Economy; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2018.
- Türkeli, S.; Huang, B.; Stasik, A.; Kemp, R. Circular Economy as a Glocal Business Activity: Mobile Phone Repair in the Netherlands, Poland and China. Energies 2019, 12, 498. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Bocken, N.M.P.; Olivetti, E.A.; Cullen, J.M.; Potting, J.; Lifset, R. Taking the Circularity to the Next Level: A Special Issue on the Circular Economy. J. Ind. Ecol. 2017, 21, 476-482. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Geissdoerfer, M.; Savaget, P.; Bocken, N.M.P.; Hultink, E.J. The Circular Economy-A new sustainability paradigm? J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 143, 757-768. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Suárez-Eiroa, B.; Fernández, E.; Méndez-Martínez, G.; Soto-Oñate, D. Operational principles of circular economy for sustainable development: Linking theory and practice. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 214, 952-961. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Korhonen, J.; Honkasalo, A.; Seppälä, J. Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations. Ecol. Econ. 2018, 143, 37-46. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Kalmykova, Y.; Sadagopan, M.; Rosado, L. Circular economy-From review of theories and practices to development of implementation tools. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 135, 190-201. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Bocken, N.; Miller, K.; Evans, S. Assessing the Environmental Impact of New Circular Business Models. In Proceedings of the Conference "New Business Models"-Exploring a Changing View on Organizing Value Creation, Toulouse, France, 16-17 June 2016. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305264490_Assessing_the_environmental_impact_of_new_ Circular_business_models (accessed on 20 July 2020).
- Sillanpää, M.; Ncibi, C. The Circular Economy. Circ. Econ. 2019, 1-334. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Wagner, E.; Bracquené, E.; Jaeger-Erben, M. Exploring 14 years of repair records -information retrieval, analysis potential and data gaps to improve reparability. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 281, 125259. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Diddi, S.; Yan, R.-N. Consumer Perceptions Related to Clothing Repair and Community Mending Events: A Circular Economy Perspective. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5306. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Nazlı, T. Repair motivation and barriers model: Investigating user perspectives related to product repair towards a circular economy. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 289, 125644. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Rabadjieva, M.; Butzin, A. Emergence and diffusion of social innovation through practice fields. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2019, 28, 925-940. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Dermody, J.; Nagase, Y.; Berger, W. Theorizing self-repairers' worldview-personhood to advance new thinking on extended product lifetimes. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2020, 44, 435-444. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Kristensen, H.S.; Mosgaard, M.A. A review of micro level indicators for a circular economy-moving away from the three dimensions of sustainability? J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 243, 118531. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Borrello, M.; Caracciolo, F.; Lombardi, A.; Pascucci, S.; Cembalo, L. Consumers' Perspective on Circular Economy Strategy for Reducing Food Waste. Sustainability 2017, 9, 141. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Meredith, J. Theory Building through Conceptual Methods. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 1993, 13, 3-11. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Webster, J.; Watson, R. Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. Mis Q. 2002, 26. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Knapp, J.A. Plugging the "whole": Librarians as interdisciplinary facilitators. Libr. Rev. 2012, 61, 199-214. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Fink, A. Conducting Research Literature Reviews; SAGE: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2014.
- Briner, R.B.; Denyer, D. Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis as a Practice and Scholarship Tool. In The Oxford Handbook of Evedence-Based Management; Press, O.U., Ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 112-129.
- Zacho, K.O.; Mosgaard, M. Understanding the role of waste prevention in local waste management: A literature review. Waste Manag. Res. 2016, 34, 980-994. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Graziano, V.; Trogal, K. The politics of collective repair: Examining object-relations in a postwork society. Cult. Stud. 2017, 31, 634-658. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Wimmer, J., Wallner, C., Winter, R., Oelsne, K., Eds.; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2017; pp. 78-94. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Calvert, P. Uncommon Ground: The Place of Cafés in Libraries. Public Libr. Q. 2017, 36, 259-263. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Hielscher, S.; Jaeger-Erben, M. From quick fixes to repair projects: Insights from a citizen science project. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 278, 123875. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Carrigan, M.; Magrizos, S.; Lazell, J.; Kostopoulos, I. Fostering sustainability through technology-mediated interactions. Inf. Technol. People 2020, 33, 919-943. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Kannengießer, S. Engaging with and reflecting on the materiality of digital media technologies: Repair and fair production. New Media Soc. 2019, 22, 123-139. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Pesch, U.; Spekkink, W.; Quist, J. Local sustainability initiatives: Innovation and civic engagement in societal experiments. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2019, 27, 300-317. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Pattillo, R.E. Meet Me for Lunch at the "Repair Café". Nurse Educ. 2012, 37, 257. [CrossRef] · DOI
- de Angelis, R. Business models and circular business models. In Business Models in the Circular Economy: Concepts, Examples and Theory; de Angelis, R., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Chapman, J., Ed.; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2017; pp. 236-249. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Milstein, T., Pileggi, M., Morgan, E., Eds.; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2017; pp. 183-194. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Popescu, D.I. Social responsibility and business ethics: IV. Social responsibility and process driven by customer. Qual.-Access Success 2017, 18, 68-72.
- Dietz, J.; Hoppe, M.; Kollmann, S.; Mansfeld, U. Bike Model District "Alte Neustadt" in Bremen. Iop Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 323, 012086. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Schulte, C.; Krüger, J.; Gödecke, A.; Schmidt, A.-K. The computing repair café: A concept for repair cafés in computing education. In Proceedings of the 13th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education, WiPSCE '18, Potsdam, Germany, 4-6 October 2018.
- Prendeville, S.; Hartung, G.; Brass, C.; Purvis, E.; Hall, A. Circular Makerspaces: The founder's view. Int. J. Sustain. Eng. 2017, 10, 272-288. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Hector, P. Making and repairing places for making and repairing. Strat. Des. Res. J. 2018, 11, 115-124. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Kohtala, C. Making "Making" Critical: How Sustainability is Constituted in Fab Lab Ideology. Des. J. 2016, 20, 375-394. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Proske, M.; Winzer, J.; Marwede, M.; Nissen, N.F.; Lang, K.-D. Obsolescence of Electronics-the Example of Smartphones; IEEE: Manhattan, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 1-8.
- McLaren, A.; Goworek, H. Investigating the Relationship Between Consumer Attitudes and Sustainable Fashion Product Development. In Sustainability in Fashion; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 171-192.
- Smith, A.; Fressoli, M.; Abrol, D.; Arond, E.; Ely, A. Grassroots Innovation Movements; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2016.
- Mouzakitis, Y.; Adamides, E.D. The Bottom-Up Side of Eco-innovation: Mapping the Dynamics of Sustainable Grassroots Innovations. Intell. Interact. Multimed. Syst. Serv. 2019, 155, 61-71. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Unterfrauner, E.; Shao, J.; Hofer, M.; Fabian, C.M. The environmental value and impact of the Maker movement-Insights from a cross-case analysis of European maker initiatives. Bus. Strat. Environ. 2019, 28, 1518-1533. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Raphael, C. Engaged Communication Scholarship for Environmental Justice: A Research Agenda. Environ. Commun. 2019, 13, 1087-1107. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Haderer, M. Revisiting the Right to the City, Rethinking Urban Environmentalism: From Lifeworld Environmentalism to Planetary Environmentalism. Soc. Sci. 2020, 9, 15. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Sabbaghi, M.; Cade, W.; Behdad, S.; Bisantz, A. The current status of the consumer electronics repair industry in the U.S.: A survey-based study. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 116, 137-151. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Nascimento, S.; Pólvora, A. Maker Cultures and the Prospects for Technological Action. Sci. Eng. Ethic 2018, 24, 927-946. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Hansen, E.G.; Revellio, F. Circular value creation architectures: Make, ally, buy, or laissez-faire. J. Ind. Ecol. 2020, 24, 1250-1273. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Borrello, M.; Pascucci, S.; Caracciolo, F.; Lombardi, A.; Cembalo, L. Consumers are willing to participate in circular business models: A practice theory perspective to food provisioning. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 259, 121013. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Meißner, M. Repair is care?-Dimensions of care within collaborative practices in repair cafes. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 299, 126913. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Sung, K.; Cooper, T.; Kettley, S. Developing interventions for scaling up UK upcycling. Energies 2019, 12, 2778. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Hepp, A. Pioneer communities: Collective actors in deep mediatisation. Media Cult. Soc. 2016, 38, 918-933. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Authors
- Moalem, R. M., & Mosgaard, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Aalborg University (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Moalem, Rikke Marie
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2021-11-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 12351
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3214252730
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 6.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Region Hovedstaden
- Region Sjælland (NYPS 20201560)
- Interreg (ID: NYPS 20201560)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Sharing Economy and Platforms
- Keywords
- repair cafés, circular economy, product repair, sustainability initiatives, repair data, stakeholder expectations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review