Cited by 65Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementSustainable Design and DevelopmentSharing Economy and Platforms

A Critical Review of the Role of Repair Cafés in a Sustainable Circular Transition

Open access
Moalem, Rikke Marie, Mosgaard, Mette Alberg·2021·Sustainability

Abstract

Extending the useful life of consumer products is a critical element in the circular economy. Although commercial repair is an established part of the global economy, the repair is often conducted informally. This means that non-commercial repair ecosystems exist, including the international network of repair cafés, spreading worldwide to over 2000 repair cafés in 37 countries (April 2021). As the first review on this topic, this article investigates and gains more knowledge about repair cafés, and critically assesses their role as a sustainability initiative, i.e., how the concept may translate into a broader sustainability context. A systematic literature review (2010–2020) was conducted, including 44 articles in descriptive and content analyses. The bibliometric data revealed an increase in the number of publications on repair cafés, particularly over the last four years, indicating that repair cafés as a research topic have started to gain attention, and this is likely to grow in numbers. However, the significant number of different places of publication indicates that this is not (yet) a well-established field with defined research channels. The content analysis revealed that the concept has spread to a range of different contexts, beyond the original scope, influencing the mindset and acts of a broad field of practitioners. This indicates a wide range of possibilities for the expansion of the concept of repair cafés, bringing different expectations on calling into question the future role of repair cafés. However, the aims of the people involved in repair cafés span from the altruistic and strategic, over personal gains, to critical consumer, financial and educational aims. This may challenge repair cafés’ future role(s), i.e., ambitions set by the international organisation of repair cafés. Notably, the ambition for actors at the micro-level is to feed in data on repair and achieve ‘collaborative repair’, as the aims of the people involved are complex, and their expectations lack alignment, both vertically and horizontally.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su132212351

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Community repair initiatives-repair cafés, shared tool libraries, and peer-to-peer skill transfer platforms-build the collective competence and social infrastructure that individual consumers lack, particularly for technically complex products.

    “Community repair initiatives-repair cafés, shared tool libraries, and peer-to-peer skill transfer platforms-build the collective competence and social infrastructure that individual consumers lack, particularly for technically complex products [3,14,21].”

    From Designing for Repair and Extended Lifespan: Consumer Expectations and Economic Constraints (2026) · cites this paper as [14]

    The paper’s “Pedagogical Aspects of Repair Movements” and “Strengthening Social Cohesion” sections say repair cafés develop local technical skills through skill-sharing and provide a place for people to meet. “Service Aspects” says they provide tools and know-how, but distinguishes repair cafés from other sharing platforms. The paper does not establish that shared tool libraries or peer-to-peer platforms have the same effects, or that those effects are particularly strong for technically complex products. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Positive community-based initiatives, such as repair cafés, can help overcome barriers to repair, particularly for electronic products.

    “Positive community-based initiatives, such as the repair café movement that began in the Netherlands, show how shared repair practices can help overcome these barriers, particularly for electronic products [14].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 63 · Cited by 65

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Towards the Circular Economy: Economic and Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition. Available online: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/publications/Ellen-MacArthur-Foundation- Towards-the-Circular-Economy-vol.1.pdf (accessed on 21 June 2020).
  2. Cooper, T. Policies for longevity. In Longer Lasting Products. Alternatives to the Throwaway Society; Cooper, T., Ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 2010. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  3. King, A.M.; Burgess, S.C.; Ijomah, W.; McMahon, C.A. Reducing waste: Repair, recondition, remanufacture or recycle? Sustain. Dev. 2006, 14, 257-267. [CrossRef] · DOI
  4. Lechner, G.; Wagner, M.J.; Tena, A.D.; Fleck, C.; Reimann, M. Exploring a regional repair network with a public funding scheme for customer repairs: The 'GRAZ repariert'-case. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 288, 125588. [CrossRef] · DOI
  5. Ghisellini, P.; Ulgiati, S. Circular economy transition in Italy. Achievements, perspectives and constraints. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 243, 118360. [CrossRef] · DOI
  6. van der Velden, M. 'Fixing the World One Thing at a Time': Community repair and a sustainable circular economy. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 304, 127151. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  7. Dewberry, E.; Sheldrick, L.; Sinclair, M.; Moreno, M.; Makatsoris, C. Developing scenarios for product longevity and sufficiency. Prod. Lifetimes Environ. 2017, 108-113. [CrossRef] · DOI
  8. Rosner, D.K. Making Citizens, Reassembling Devices: On Gender and the Development of Contemporary Public Sites of Repair in Northern California. Public Cult. 2014, 26, 51-77. [CrossRef] · DOI
  9. Routledge. Designing for the Circular Economy; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2018.
  10. Türkeli, S.; Huang, B.; Stasik, A.; Kemp, R. Circular Economy as a Glocal Business Activity: Mobile Phone Repair in the Netherlands, Poland and China. Energies 2019, 12, 498. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  11. Bocken, N.M.P.; Olivetti, E.A.; Cullen, J.M.; Potting, J.; Lifset, R. Taking the Circularity to the Next Level: A Special Issue on the Circular Economy. J. Ind. Ecol. 2017, 21, 476-482. [CrossRef] · DOI
  12. Geissdoerfer, M.; Savaget, P.; Bocken, N.M.P.; Hultink, E.J. The Circular Economy-A new sustainability paradigm? J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 143, 757-768. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  13. Suárez-Eiroa, B.; Fernández, E.; Méndez-Martínez, G.; Soto-Oñate, D. Operational principles of circular economy for sustainable development: Linking theory and practice. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 214, 952-961. [CrossRef] · DOI
  14. Korhonen, J.; Honkasalo, A.; Seppälä, J. Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations. Ecol. Econ. 2018, 143, 37-46. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  15. Kalmykova, Y.; Sadagopan, M.; Rosado, L. Circular economy-From review of theories and practices to development of implementation tools. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 135, 190-201. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  16. Bocken, N.; Miller, K.; Evans, S. Assessing the Environmental Impact of New Circular Business Models. In Proceedings of the Conference "New Business Models"-Exploring a Changing View on Organizing Value Creation, Toulouse, France, 16-17 June 2016. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305264490_Assessing_the_environmental_impact_of_new_ Circular_business_models (accessed on 20 July 2020).
  17. Sillanpää, M.; Ncibi, C. The Circular Economy. Circ. Econ. 2019, 1-334. [CrossRef] · DOI
  18. Wagner, E.; Bracquené, E.; Jaeger-Erben, M. Exploring 14 years of repair records -information retrieval, analysis potential and data gaps to improve reparability. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 281, 125259. [CrossRef] · DOI
  19. Diddi, S.; Yan, R.-N. Consumer Perceptions Related to Clothing Repair and Community Mending Events: A Circular Economy Perspective. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5306. [CrossRef] · DOI
  20. Nazlı, T. Repair motivation and barriers model: Investigating user perspectives related to product repair towards a circular economy. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 289, 125644. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  21. Rabadjieva, M.; Butzin, A. Emergence and diffusion of social innovation through practice fields. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2019, 28, 925-940. [CrossRef] · DOI
  22. Dermody, J.; Nagase, Y.; Berger, W. Theorizing self-repairers' worldview-personhood to advance new thinking on extended product lifetimes. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2020, 44, 435-444. [CrossRef] · DOI
  23. Kristensen, H.S.; Mosgaard, M.A. A review of micro level indicators for a circular economy-moving away from the three dimensions of sustainability? J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 243, 118531. [CrossRef] · DOI
  24. Borrello, M.; Caracciolo, F.; Lombardi, A.; Pascucci, S.; Cembalo, L. Consumers' Perspective on Circular Economy Strategy for Reducing Food Waste. Sustainability 2017, 9, 141. [CrossRef] · DOI
  25. Meredith, J. Theory Building through Conceptual Methods. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 1993, 13, 3-11. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  26. Webster, J.; Watson, R. Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. Mis Q. 2002, 26. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  27. Knapp, J.A. Plugging the "whole": Librarians as interdisciplinary facilitators. Libr. Rev. 2012, 61, 199-214. [CrossRef] · DOI
  28. Fink, A. Conducting Research Literature Reviews; SAGE: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2014.
  29. Briner, R.B.; Denyer, D. Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis as a Practice and Scholarship Tool. In The Oxford Handbook of Evedence-Based Management; Press, O.U., Ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 112-129.
  30. Zacho, K.O.; Mosgaard, M. Understanding the role of waste prevention in local waste management: A literature review. Waste Manag. Res. 2016, 34, 980-994. [CrossRef] · DOI
  31. Graziano, V.; Trogal, K. The politics of collective repair: Examining object-relations in a postwork society. Cult. Stud. 2017, 31, 634-658. [CrossRef] · DOI
  32. Wimmer, J., Wallner, C., Winter, R., Oelsne, K., Eds.; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2017; pp. 78-94. [CrossRef] · DOI
  33. Calvert, P. Uncommon Ground: The Place of Cafés in Libraries. Public Libr. Q. 2017, 36, 259-263. [CrossRef] · DOI
  34. Hielscher, S.; Jaeger-Erben, M. From quick fixes to repair projects: Insights from a citizen science project. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 278, 123875. [CrossRef] · DOI
  35. Carrigan, M.; Magrizos, S.; Lazell, J.; Kostopoulos, I. Fostering sustainability through technology-mediated interactions. Inf. Technol. People 2020, 33, 919-943. [CrossRef] · DOI
  36. Kannengießer, S. Engaging with and reflecting on the materiality of digital media technologies: Repair and fair production. New Media Soc. 2019, 22, 123-139. [CrossRef] · DOI
  37. Pesch, U.; Spekkink, W.; Quist, J. Local sustainability initiatives: Innovation and civic engagement in societal experiments. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2019, 27, 300-317. [CrossRef] · DOI
  38. Pattillo, R.E. Meet Me for Lunch at the "Repair Café". Nurse Educ. 2012, 37, 257. [CrossRef] · DOI
  39. de Angelis, R. Business models and circular business models. In Business Models in the Circular Economy: Concepts, Examples and Theory; de Angelis, R., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018. [CrossRef] · DOI
  40. Chapman, J., Ed.; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2017; pp. 236-249. [CrossRef] · DOI
  41. Milstein, T., Pileggi, M., Morgan, E., Eds.; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2017; pp. 183-194. [CrossRef] · DOI
  42. Popescu, D.I. Social responsibility and business ethics: IV. Social responsibility and process driven by customer. Qual.-Access Success 2017, 18, 68-72.
  43. Dietz, J.; Hoppe, M.; Kollmann, S.; Mansfeld, U. Bike Model District "Alte Neustadt" in Bremen. Iop Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 323, 012086. [CrossRef] · DOI
  44. Schulte, C.; Krüger, J.; Gödecke, A.; Schmidt, A.-K. The computing repair café: A concept for repair cafés in computing education. In Proceedings of the 13th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education, WiPSCE '18, Potsdam, Germany, 4-6 October 2018.
  45. Prendeville, S.; Hartung, G.; Brass, C.; Purvis, E.; Hall, A. Circular Makerspaces: The founder's view. Int. J. Sustain. Eng. 2017, 10, 272-288. [CrossRef] · DOI
  46. Hector, P. Making and repairing places for making and repairing. Strat. Des. Res. J. 2018, 11, 115-124. [CrossRef] · DOI
  47. Kohtala, C. Making "Making" Critical: How Sustainability is Constituted in Fab Lab Ideology. Des. J. 2016, 20, 375-394. [CrossRef] · DOI
  48. Proske, M.; Winzer, J.; Marwede, M.; Nissen, N.F.; Lang, K.-D. Obsolescence of Electronics-the Example of Smartphones; IEEE: Manhattan, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 1-8.
  49. McLaren, A.; Goworek, H. Investigating the Relationship Between Consumer Attitudes and Sustainable Fashion Product Development. In Sustainability in Fashion; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 171-192.
  50. Smith, A.; Fressoli, M.; Abrol, D.; Arond, E.; Ely, A. Grassroots Innovation Movements; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2016.
  51. Mouzakitis, Y.; Adamides, E.D. The Bottom-Up Side of Eco-innovation: Mapping the Dynamics of Sustainable Grassroots Innovations. Intell. Interact. Multimed. Syst. Serv. 2019, 155, 61-71. [CrossRef] · DOI
  52. Unterfrauner, E.; Shao, J.; Hofer, M.; Fabian, C.M. The environmental value and impact of the Maker movement-Insights from a cross-case analysis of European maker initiatives. Bus. Strat. Environ. 2019, 28, 1518-1533. [CrossRef] · DOI
  53. Raphael, C. Engaged Communication Scholarship for Environmental Justice: A Research Agenda. Environ. Commun. 2019, 13, 1087-1107. [CrossRef] · DOI
  54. Haderer, M. Revisiting the Right to the City, Rethinking Urban Environmentalism: From Lifeworld Environmentalism to Planetary Environmentalism. Soc. Sci. 2020, 9, 15. [CrossRef] · DOI
  55. Sabbaghi, M.; Cade, W.; Behdad, S.; Bisantz, A. The current status of the consumer electronics repair industry in the U.S.: A survey-based study. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 116, 137-151. [CrossRef] · DOI
  56. Nascimento, S.; Pólvora, A. Maker Cultures and the Prospects for Technological Action. Sci. Eng. Ethic 2018, 24, 927-946. [CrossRef] · DOI
  57. Hansen, E.G.; Revellio, F. Circular value creation architectures: Make, ally, buy, or laissez-faire. J. Ind. Ecol. 2020, 24, 1250-1273. [CrossRef] · DOI
  58. Borrello, M.; Pascucci, S.; Caracciolo, F.; Lombardi, A.; Cembalo, L. Consumers are willing to participate in circular business models: A practice theory perspective to food provisioning. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 259, 121013. [CrossRef] · DOI
  59. Meißner, M. Repair is care?-Dimensions of care within collaborative practices in repair cafes. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 299, 126913. [CrossRef] · DOI
  60. Sung, K.; Cooper, T.; Kettley, S. Developing interventions for scaling up UK upcycling. Energies 2019, 12, 2778. [CrossRef] · DOI
  61. Hepp, A. Pioneer communities: Collective actors in deep mediatisation. Media Cult. Soc. 2016, 38, 918-933. [CrossRef] · DOI

Authors
Moalem, R. M., & Mosgaard, M. A.
Affiliations
Aalborg University (DK)
Corresponding author
Moalem, Rikke Marie
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-11-09
Volume
13
Issue
22
Pages
12351
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3214252730
Cited by
65
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 4
FWCI
6.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Region Hovedstaden
  • Region Sjælland (NYPS 20201560)
  • Interreg (ID: NYPS 20201560)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Sharing Economy and Platforms
Keywords
repair cafés, circular economy, product repair, sustainability initiatives, repair data, stakeholder expectations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review