Toward a circular value chain: impact of the circular economy on a company's value chain processes
Open accessAbstract
On their way toward a circular economy, companies are often unsure how circular solutions will affect their organization. Uncertainties due to a design over multiple life cycles and a complex interconnectedness with diverse stakeholders make circular economy effects difficult to predict. This study contributes new knowledge on the implementation of a circular economy by analyzing the implications of circular solutions for a company's value chain processes. In a systematic literature review, potential implications of a circular economy are structured along Porter's value chain framework and seven overarching main topics are identified. They refer to stakeholder collaboration, consumers' perception, Industry 4.0, performance measurement, multiple life cycle thinking, circular economy-specific skills, and a supportive top management and corporate culture. The analyses show that the linear structure of Porter's framework is not sufficient to reflect circular business practices, requiring changes toward a circular and interconnected view. Therefore, a circular value chain model is newly proposed which adapts the traditional management perspective of a company's operating model to circularity. The study connects insights from management and circular economy research, integrates circularity in managerial thought patterns, and supports strategic decision-making in a circular economy context.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The procurement process has not been a main topic in the circular economy field.
“the procurement process has not been a main topic in the circular economy field (Eisenreich et al., 2022)”
From Implementation and management of a circular public procurement contract for furniture (2023) · cites this paper as Eisenreich et al., 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., Jabbour, C. J. C., Godinho Filho, M., & Roubaud, D. (2018) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-018-2772-8 · Cited by 1,116 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 88
- Abbey, J.D., Meloy, M.G., Guide, V.D.R., Atalay, S., 2015. Remanufactured products in closed-loop supply chains for consumer goods. Prod. Oper. Manag. 24, 488-503. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12238. · DOI
- Aboulamer, A., 2018. Adopting a circular business model improves market equity value. Thunderbird Int. Bus. Rev. 60, 765-769. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21922. · DOI
- Ackermann, L., Mugge, R., Schoormans, J., 2018. Consumers' perspective on product care: an exploratory study of motivators, ability factors, and triggers. J. Clean. Prod. 183, 380-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.099. · DOI
- Alhawari, O., Awan, U., Bhutta, M.K.S., Ülkü, M.A., 2021. Insights from circular economy literature: a review of extant definitions and unravelling paths to future research. Sustainability 13, 859. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020859. · DOI
- Allen, N.J., Meyer, J.P., 1990. The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. J. Occup. Psychol. 63, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x. · DOI
- Almagtome, A.H., Al-Yasiri, A.J., Ali, R.S., Kadhim, H.L., Bekheet, H.N., 2020. Circular economy initiatives through energy accounting and sustainable energy performance under integrated reporting framework. Int. J. Math. Eng. Manag. Sci. 5, 1032-1045. https://doi.org/10.33889/IJMEMS.2020.5.6.079. · DOI
- Aminoff, A., Pihlajamaa, M., 2020. Business experimentation for a circular economy - learning in the front end of innovation. J. Clean. Prod. 275, 124051 https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124051. · DOI
- Atlason, R.S., Giacalone, D., Parajuly, K., 2017. Product design in the circular economy: users' perception of end-of-life scenarios for electrical and electronic appliances. J. Clean. Prod. 168, 1059-1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.082. · DOI
- Awan, U., Sroufe, R., 2022. Sustainability in the circular economy: insights and dynamics of designing circular business models. Appl. Sci. 12, 1521. https://doi.org/10.3390/ app12031521. · DOI
- Awan, U., Sroufe, R., Shahbaz, M., 2021. Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: a literature review and recommendations for future research. Bus. Strat. Environ. 30, 2038-2060. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2731. · DOI · Paper page
- Barnabè, F., Nazir, S., 2020. Investigating the interplays between integrated reporting practices and circular economy disclosure. Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manag. https://doi. org/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2020-0128. · DOI
- Barnett-Page, E., Thomas, J., 2009. Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 9, 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471- 2288-9-59. · DOI
- Barney, J.B., 2001. Is the resource-based "view" a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Acad. Manag. Rev. 26, 41-56. https://doi.org/10.2307/ 259393. · DOI · Paper page
- Berg, S., 1988. Snowball sampling. In: Kotz, S., Johnson, N.L. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Stastistical Sciences. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 528-532.
- Campbell-Johnston, K., Calisto Friant, M., Thapa, K., Lakerveld, D., Vermeulen, W.J.V., 2020. How circular is your tyre: experiences with extended producer responsibility from a circular economy perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 270, 122042 https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122042. · DOI
- Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Chiaroni, D., del Vecchio, P., Urbinati, A., 2020. Designing business models in circular economy: a systematic literature review and research agenda. Bus. Strat. Environ. 29, 1734-1749. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2466. · DOI · Paper page
- Chauhan, C., Sharma, A., Singh, A., 2021. A SAP-LAP linkages framework for integrating Industry 4.0 and circular economy. Benchmark 28, 1463-5771. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/BIJ-10-2018-0310. · DOI
- Chiappetta Jabbour, C.J., Sarkis, J., Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A.B., Scott Renwick, D.W., Singh, S.K., Grebinevych, O., Kruglianskas, I., Filho, M.G., 2019. Who is in charge? A review and a research agenda on the 'human side' of the circular economy. J. Clean. Prod. 222, 793-801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.038. · DOI
- Colucci, M., Vecchi, A., 2021. Close the loop: evidence on the implementation of the circular economy from the Italian fashion industry. Bus. Strat. Environ. 30, 856-873. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2658. · DOI
- Cwiklicki, M., Wojnarowska, M., 2020. Circular economy and Industry 4.0: one-way or two-way relationships? Eng. Econ. 31, 387-397. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01. ee.31.4.24565. · DOI
- De Angelis, R., 2020. Circular economy and paradox theory: a business model perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 285, 124823 https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2020.124823. · DOI
- De Angelis, R., Howard, M., Miemczyk, J., 2018. Supply chain management and the circular economy: towards the circular supply chain. Prod. Plann. Control 29, 425-437. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1449244. · DOI
- De los Rios, I.C., Charnley, F., 2017. Skills and capabilities for a sustainable and circular economy: the changing role of design. J. Clean. Prod. 160, 109-122. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.130. · DOI
- DiMaggio, P.J., Powell, W.W., 1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am. Socio. Rev. 48, 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101. · DOI · Paper page
- Eisenreich, A., Füller, J., Stuchtey, M., 2021. Open circular innovation: how companies can develop circular innovations in collaboration with stakeholders. Sustainability 13, 13456. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313456. · DOI
- Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2013. Towards the circular economy: economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. http://www.ellenmacarthurfoundati on.org/assets/downloads/publications/Ellen-MacArthur-Foundation-Towards-the- Circular-Economy-vol.1.pdf. (Accessed 5 October 2021).
- Esmaeilian, B., Behdad, S., Wang, B., 2016. The evolution and future of manufacturing: a review. J. Manuf. Syst. 39, 79-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2016.03.001. · DOI
- Farooque, M., Zhang, A., Thürer, M., Qu, T., Huisingh, D., 2019. Circular supply chain management: a definition and structured literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 228, 882-900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.303. · DOI · Paper page
- Franco, M.A., 2017. Circular economy at the micro level: a dynamic view of incumbents' struggles and challenges in the textile industry. J. Clean. Prod. 168, 833-845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.056. · DOI
- Frishammar, J., Parida, V., 2019. Circular business model transformation: a roadmap for incumbent firms. Calif. Manag. Rev. 61, 5-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0008125618811926. · DOI
- Geissdoerfer, M., Morioka, S.N., de Carvalho, M.M., Evans, S., 2018. Business models and supply chains for the circular economy. J. Clean. Prod. 190, 712-721. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.159. · DOI
- Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N.M.P., Hultink, E.J., 2017. The circular economy -a new sustainability paradigm? J. Clean. Prod. 143, 757-768. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048. · DOI · Paper page
- Gilligan, C., 1993. In: A Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
- Govindan, K., Hasanagic, M., 2018. A systematic review on drivers, barriers, and practices towards circular economy: a supply chain perspective. Int. J. Prod. Res. 56, 278-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1402141. · DOI
- Grant, A.M., 2008. Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. J. Appl. Psychol. 93, 48-58. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.48. Guldmann, E., Huulgaard, R.D., 2020. Barriers to circular business model innovation: a multiple-case study. J. Clean. Prod. 243, 118160 https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2019.118160. · DOI
- Hambrick, D.C., Fredrickson, J.W., 2001. Are you sure you have a strategy? Acad. Manag. Perspect. 15, 48-59. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2001.5897655. · DOI
- Hazen, B.T., Mollenkopf, D.A., Wang, Y., 2017. Remanufacturing for the circular economy: an examination of consumer switching behavior. Bus. Strat. Environ. 26, 451-464. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1929. · DOI
- Hazen, B.T., Russo, I., Confente, I., Pellathy, D., 2021. Supply chain management for circular economy: conceptual framework and research agenda. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2, 510-537. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-12-2019-0332. · DOI
- Hofmann, F., Jaeger-Erben, M., 2020. Organizational transition management of circular business model innovations. Bus. Strat. Environ. 29, 2770-2788. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/bse.2542. · DOI
- Hvass, K.K., Pedersen, E.R.G., 2019. Toward circular economy of fashion: experiences from a brand's product take-back initiative. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. 23, 345-365. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-04-2018-0059. · DOI
- Jaeger, B., Upadhyay, A., 2020. Understanding barriers to circular economy: cases from the manufacturing industry. J. Enterprise Inf. Manag. 33, 729-745. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/JEIM-02-2019-0047. · DOI
- Jakhar, S.K., Mangla, S.K., Luthra, S., Kusi-Sarpong, S., 2019. When stakeholder pressure drives the circular economy: measuring the mediating role of innovation capabilities. Manag. Decis. 57, 904-920. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2018- 0990. · DOI
- Jia, F., Yin, S., Chen, L., Chen, X., 2020. The circular economy in the textile and apparel industry: a systematic literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 259, 120728 https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120728. · DOI
- Kalmykova, Y., Sadagopan, M., Rosado, L., 2018. Circular economy -from review of theories and practices to development of implementation tools. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 135, 190-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.034. · DOI · Paper page
- Kazancoglu, I., Kazancoglu, Y., Kahraman, A., Yarimoglu, E., Soni, G., 2020. Investigating barriers to circular supply chain in the textile industry from stakeholders' perspective. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 13675567.2020.1846694. · DOI
- Kirchherr, J., Piscicelli, L., Bour, R., Kostense-Smit, E., Muller, J., Huibrechtse- Truijens, A., Hekkert, M., 2018. Barriers to the circular economy: evidence from the European union (EU). Ecol. Econ. 150, 264-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolecon.2018.04.028. · DOI · Paper page
- Kissling, R., Coughlan, D., Fitzpatrick, C., Boeni, H., Luepschen, C., Andrew, S., Dickenson, J., 2013. Success factors and barriers in re-use of electrical and electronic equipment. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 80, 21-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. resconrec.2013.07.009. · DOI
- Konietzko, J., Bocken, N.M.P., Hultink, E.J., 2020. Circular ecosystem innovation: an initial set of principles. J. Clean. Prod. 253, 119942 https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2019.119942. · DOI
- Kurilova-Palisaitiene, J., Sundin, E., Poksinska, B., 2018. Remanufacturing challenges and possible lean improvements. J. Clean. Prod. 172, 3225-3236. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.023. · DOI · Paper page
- Lieder, M., Rashid, A., 2016. Towards circular economy implementation: a comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry. J. Clean. Prod. 115, 36-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042. · DOI · Paper page
- Linder, M., Williander, M., 2017. Circular business model innovation: inherent uncertainties. Bus. Strat. Environ. 26, 182-196. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1906. · DOI
- Masi, D., Day, S., Godsell, J., 2017. Supply chain configurations in the circular economy: a systematic literature review. Sustainability 9, 1602. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su9091602. · DOI
- Meherishi, L., Narayana, S.A., Ranjani, K.S., 2019. Sustainable packaging for supply chain management in the circular economy: a review. J. Clean. Prod. 237, 117582 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.057. · DOI
- Merli, R., Preziosi, M., Acampora, A., 2018. How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 178, 703-722. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.112. · DOI
- Neligan, A., 2018. Digitalisation as enabler towards a sustainable circular economy in Germany. Intereconomics 53, 101-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-018-0729- 4. · DOI
- Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., 2010. Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, p. 278.
- Paes, L.A.B., Bezerra, B.S., Deus, R.M., Jugend, D., Battistelle, R.A.G., 2019. Organic solid waste management in a circular economy perspective -a systematic review and SWOT analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 239, 118086 https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2019.118086. · DOI
- Pavel, S., 2018. Circular economy: the beauty of circularity in value chain. J. Econ. Bus. 1, 584-598. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1992.01.04.52. Pearce, D.W., Turner, R.K., 1990. Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, USA. · DOI
- Pedersen, E.R.G., Earley, R., Andersen, K.R., 2019. From singular to plural: exploring organizational complexities and circular business model design. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. 23, 308-326. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-04-2018-0062. · DOI
- Pinheiro, M.A.P., Seles, B.M.R.P., de Camargo Fiorini, P., Jugend, D., Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A.B., da Silva, H.M.R., Latan, H., 2019. The role of new product development in underpinning the circular economy: a systematic review and integrative framework. Manag. Decis. 57, 840-862. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD- 07-2018-0782. · DOI
- Porter, M., 1985. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press, New York.
- Prieto-Sandoval, V., Jaca, C., Santos, J., Baumgartner, R.J., Ormazabal, M., 2019. Key strategies, resources, and capabilities for implementing circular economy in industrial small and medium enterprises. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 26, 1473-1484. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1761. · DOI
- Ranta, V., Aarikka-Stenroos, L., Mäkinen, S.J., 2018. Creating value in the circular economy: a structured multiple-case analysis of business models. J. Clean. Prod. 201, 988-1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.072. · DOI
- Rizos, V., Behrens, A., van der Gaast, W., Hofman, E., Ioannou, A., Kafyeke, T., Flamos, A., Rinaldi, R., Papadelis, S., Hirschnitz-Garbers, M., Topi, C., 2016. Implementation of circular economy business models by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): barriers and enablers. Sustainability 8, 1212. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su8111212. · DOI · Paper page
- Rosa, P., Sassanelli, C., Terzi, S., 2019. Circular business models versus circular benefits: an assessment in the waste from electrical and electronic equipments sector. J. Clean. Prod. 231, 940-952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.310. · DOI
- Salmenperä, H., Pitkänen, K., Kautto, P., Saikku, L., 2021. Critical factors for enhancing the circular economy in waste management. J. Clean. Prod. 280, 124339 https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124339. · DOI
- Salvador, R., Barros, M.V., da Luz, L., Piekarski, C.M., de Francisco, A.C., 2020. Circular business models: current aspects that influence implementation and unaddressed subjects. J. Clean. Prod. 250, 119555 https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2019.119555. · DOI
- Salvador, R., Puglieri, F.N., Halog, A., Andrade, F., Piekarski, C.M., de Francisco, A.C., 2021. Key aspects for designing business models for a circular bioeconomy. J. Clean. Prod. 278, 124341 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124341. · DOI
- Sandvik, I.M., Stubbs, W., 2019. Circular fashion supply chain through textile-to-textile recycling. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. 23, 366-381. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-04- 2018-0058. · DOI
- Sarja, M., Onkila, T., Mäkelä, M., 2021. A systematic literature review of the transition to the circular economy in business organizations: obstacles, catalysts and ambivalences. J. Clean. Prod. 286, 125492 https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2020.125492. · DOI
- Sauerwein, M., Doubrovski, E., Balkenende, R., Bakker, C.A., 2019. Exploring the potential of additive manufacturing for product design in a circular economy. J. Clean. Prod. 226, 1138-1149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.108. · DOI
- Schallehn, H., Seuring, S., Strähle, J., Freise, M., 2019. Customer experience creation for after-use products: a product-service systems-based review. J. Clean. Prod. 210, 929-944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.292. · DOI
- Shahbazi, S., Wiktorsson, M., Kurdve, M., Jönsson, C., Bjelkemyr, M., 2016. Material efficiency in manufacturing: Swedish evidence on potential, barriers and strategies. J. Clean. Prod. 127, 438-450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.143. · DOI
- Singhal, D., Tripathy, S., Jena, S.K., 2019. Acceptance of remanufactured products in the circular economy: an empirical study in India. Manag. Decis. 57, 953-970. https:// doi.org/10.1108/MD-06-2018-0686. · DOI
- Spaargaren, G., Mol, A.P.J., 1992. Sociology, environment, and modernity: ecological modernization as a theory of social change. Soc. Nat. Resour. 5, 323-344. https:// doi.org/10.1080/08941929209380797. · DOI
- Sumter, D., de Koning, J., Bakker, C.A., Balkenende, R., 2020. Circular economy competencies for design. Sustainability 12, 1561. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su12041561. · DOI
- Svensson, N., Funck, E.K., 2019. Management control in circular economy. Exploring and theorizing the adaptation of management control to circular business models. J. Clean. Prod. 233, 390-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.089. · DOI
- Tesfaye, W., Kitaw, D., 2021. Conceptualizing reverse logistics to plastics recycling system. Soc. Responsib. J. 17, 686-702. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-12-2019- 0411. · DOI
- Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., Smart, P., 2003. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br. J. Manag. 14, 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375. · DOI · Paper page
- Tukker, A., 2015. Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy -a review. J. Clean. Prod. 97, 76-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.049. · DOI · Paper page
- Tura, N., Hanski, J., Ahola, T., Ståhle, M., Piiparinen, S., Valkokari, P., 2019. Unlocking circular business: a framework of barriers and drivers. J. Clean. Prod. 212, 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.202. · DOI
- Van Weelden, E., Mugge, R., Bakker, C.A., 2016. Paving the way towards circular consumption: exploring consumer acceptance of refurbished mobile phones in the Dutch market. J. Clean. Prod. 113, 743-754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2015.11.065. · DOI
- Vegter, D., van Hillegersberg, J., Olthaar, M., 2020. Supply chains in circular business models: processes and performance objectives. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 162, 105046 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105046. · DOI
- Vehmas, K., Raudaskoski, A., Heikkilä, P., Harlin, A., Mensonen, A., 2018. Consumer attitudes and communication in circular fashion. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. 22, 286-300. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-08-2017-0079. · DOI
- Vogt Duberg, J., Johansson, G., Sundin, E., Kurilova-Palisaitiene, J., 2020. Prerequisite factors for original equipment manufacturer remanufacturing. J. Clean. Prod. 270, 122309 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122309. · DOI
- Wang, Y., Hazen, B.T., 2016. Consumer product knowledge and intention to purchase remanufactured products. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 181, 460-469. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.08.031. · DOI
- Wernerfelt, B., 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strat. Manag. J. 5, 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207. · DOI · Paper page
- Yang, M., Evans, S., 2019. Product-service system business model archetypes and sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 220, 1156-1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2019.02.067. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Implementation and management of a circular public procurement contract for furniture
Lingegård, S., & von Oelreich, K. (2023) · Frontiers in Sustainability · doi:10.3389/frsus.2023.1136725 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“In terms of focus areas, the procurement process has not been a main topic in the circular economy field (Eisenreich et al., 2022), even though procurement is stated to be strategically important for circular solutions (Alhola et al.”
Background
- Authors
- Eisenreich, A., Füller, J., Stuchtey, M., & Gimenez-Jimenez, D.
- Affiliations
- Universität Innsbruck (AT)
- TU Dortmund University (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Eisenreich, Anja
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-12
- Volume
- 378
- Pages
- 134375
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4297494200
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 54 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 16
- FWCI
- 18.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Digital Library of the University of Innsbruck (University of Innsbruck) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Sustainable Industrial Ecology
- Keywords
- circular economy, circular value chains, stakeholder collaboration, consumer perception, Industry 4.0, performance measurement, top management support, organizational culture, strategic decision-making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review