Cited by 154Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessSustainable Industrial Ecology

Toward a circular value chain: impact of the circular economy on a company's value chain processes

Open access
Eisenreich, Anja, Füller, Johann, Stuchtey, Martin, Gimenez-Jimenez, Daniela·2022·Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract

On their way toward a circular economy, companies are often unsure how circular solutions will affect their organization. Uncertainties due to a design over multiple life cycles and a complex interconnectedness with diverse stakeholders make circular economy effects difficult to predict. This study contributes new knowledge on the implementation of a circular economy by analyzing the implications of circular solutions for a company's value chain processes. In a systematic literature review, potential implications of a circular economy are structured along Porter's value chain framework and seven overarching main topics are identified. They refer to stakeholder collaboration, consumers' perception, Industry 4.0, performance measurement, multiple life cycle thinking, circular economy-specific skills, and a supportive top management and corporate culture. The analyses show that the linear structure of Porter's framework is not sufficient to reflect circular business practices, requiring changes toward a circular and interconnected view. Therefore, a circular value chain model is newly proposed which adapts the traditional management perspective of a company's operating model to circularity. The study connects insights from management and circular economy research, integrates circularity in managerial thought patterns, and supports strategic decision-making in a circular economy context.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134375

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 88

  1. Abbey, J.D., Meloy, M.G., Guide, V.D.R., Atalay, S., 2015. Remanufactured products in closed-loop supply chains for consumer goods. Prod. Oper. Manag. 24, 488-503. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12238. · DOI
  2. Aboulamer, A., 2018. Adopting a circular business model improves market equity value. Thunderbird Int. Bus. Rev. 60, 765-769. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21922. · DOI
  3. Ackermann, L., Mugge, R., Schoormans, J., 2018. Consumers' perspective on product care: an exploratory study of motivators, ability factors, and triggers. J. Clean. Prod. 183, 380-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.099. · DOI
  4. Alhawari, O., Awan, U., Bhutta, M.K.S., Ülkü, M.A., 2021. Insights from circular economy literature: a review of extant definitions and unravelling paths to future research. Sustainability 13, 859. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020859. · DOI
  5. Allen, N.J., Meyer, J.P., 1990. The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. J. Occup. Psychol. 63, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x. · DOI
  6. Almagtome, A.H., Al-Yasiri, A.J., Ali, R.S., Kadhim, H.L., Bekheet, H.N., 2020. Circular economy initiatives through energy accounting and sustainable energy performance under integrated reporting framework. Int. J. Math. Eng. Manag. Sci. 5, 1032-1045. https://doi.org/10.33889/IJMEMS.2020.5.6.079. · DOI
  7. Aminoff, A., Pihlajamaa, M., 2020. Business experimentation for a circular economy - learning in the front end of innovation. J. Clean. Prod. 275, 124051 https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124051. · DOI
  8. Atlason, R.S., Giacalone, D., Parajuly, K., 2017. Product design in the circular economy: users' perception of end-of-life scenarios for electrical and electronic appliances. J. Clean. Prod. 168, 1059-1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.082. · DOI
  9. Awan, U., Sroufe, R., 2022. Sustainability in the circular economy: insights and dynamics of designing circular business models. Appl. Sci. 12, 1521. https://doi.org/10.3390/ app12031521. · DOI
  10. Awan, U., Sroufe, R., Shahbaz, M., 2021. Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: a literature review and recommendations for future research. Bus. Strat. Environ. 30, 2038-2060. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2731. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Barnabè, F., Nazir, S., 2020. Investigating the interplays between integrated reporting practices and circular economy disclosure. Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manag. https://doi. org/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2020-0128. · DOI
  12. Barnett-Page, E., Thomas, J., 2009. Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 9, 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471- 2288-9-59. · DOI
  13. Barney, J.B., 2001. Is the resource-based "view" a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Acad. Manag. Rev. 26, 41-56. https://doi.org/10.2307/ 259393. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Berg, S., 1988. Snowball sampling. In: Kotz, S., Johnson, N.L. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Stastistical Sciences. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 528-532.
  15. Campbell-Johnston, K., Calisto Friant, M., Thapa, K., Lakerveld, D., Vermeulen, W.J.V., 2020. How circular is your tyre: experiences with extended producer responsibility from a circular economy perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 270, 122042 https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122042. · DOI
  16. Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Chiaroni, D., del Vecchio, P., Urbinati, A., 2020. Designing business models in circular economy: a systematic literature review and research agenda. Bus. Strat. Environ. 29, 1734-1749. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2466. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Chauhan, C., Sharma, A., Singh, A., 2021. A SAP-LAP linkages framework for integrating Industry 4.0 and circular economy. Benchmark 28, 1463-5771. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/BIJ-10-2018-0310. · DOI
  18. Chiappetta Jabbour, C.J., Sarkis, J., Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A.B., Scott Renwick, D.W., Singh, S.K., Grebinevych, O., Kruglianskas, I., Filho, M.G., 2019. Who is in charge? A review and a research agenda on the 'human side' of the circular economy. J. Clean. Prod. 222, 793-801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.038. · DOI
  19. Colucci, M., Vecchi, A., 2021. Close the loop: evidence on the implementation of the circular economy from the Italian fashion industry. Bus. Strat. Environ. 30, 856-873. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2658. · DOI
  20. Cwiklicki, M., Wojnarowska, M., 2020. Circular economy and Industry 4.0: one-way or two-way relationships? Eng. Econ. 31, 387-397. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01. ee.31.4.24565. · DOI
  21. De Angelis, R., 2020. Circular economy and paradox theory: a business model perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 285, 124823 https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2020.124823. · DOI
  22. De Angelis, R., Howard, M., Miemczyk, J., 2018. Supply chain management and the circular economy: towards the circular supply chain. Prod. Plann. Control 29, 425-437. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1449244. · DOI
  23. De los Rios, I.C., Charnley, F., 2017. Skills and capabilities for a sustainable and circular economy: the changing role of design. J. Clean. Prod. 160, 109-122. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.130. · DOI
  24. DiMaggio, P.J., Powell, W.W., 1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am. Socio. Rev. 48, 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101. · DOI · Paper page
  25. Eisenreich, A., Füller, J., Stuchtey, M., 2021. Open circular innovation: how companies can develop circular innovations in collaboration with stakeholders. Sustainability 13, 13456. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313456. · DOI
  26. Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2013. Towards the circular economy: economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. http://www.ellenmacarthurfoundati on.org/assets/downloads/publications/Ellen-MacArthur-Foundation-Towards-the- Circular-Economy-vol.1.pdf. (Accessed 5 October 2021).
  27. Esmaeilian, B., Behdad, S., Wang, B., 2016. The evolution and future of manufacturing: a review. J. Manuf. Syst. 39, 79-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2016.03.001. · DOI
  28. Farooque, M., Zhang, A., Thürer, M., Qu, T., Huisingh, D., 2019. Circular supply chain management: a definition and structured literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 228, 882-900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.303. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Franco, M.A., 2017. Circular economy at the micro level: a dynamic view of incumbents' struggles and challenges in the textile industry. J. Clean. Prod. 168, 833-845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.056. · DOI
  30. Frishammar, J., Parida, V., 2019. Circular business model transformation: a roadmap for incumbent firms. Calif. Manag. Rev. 61, 5-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0008125618811926. · DOI
  31. Geissdoerfer, M., Morioka, S.N., de Carvalho, M.M., Evans, S., 2018. Business models and supply chains for the circular economy. J. Clean. Prod. 190, 712-721. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.159. · DOI
  32. Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N.M.P., Hultink, E.J., 2017. The circular economy -a new sustainability paradigm? J. Clean. Prod. 143, 757-768. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048. · DOI · Paper page
  33. Gilligan, C., 1993. In: A Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  34. Govindan, K., Hasanagic, M., 2018. A systematic review on drivers, barriers, and practices towards circular economy: a supply chain perspective. Int. J. Prod. Res. 56, 278-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1402141. · DOI
  35. Grant, A.M., 2008. Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. J. Appl. Psychol. 93, 48-58. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.48. Guldmann, E., Huulgaard, R.D., 2020. Barriers to circular business model innovation: a multiple-case study. J. Clean. Prod. 243, 118160 https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2019.118160. · DOI
  36. Hambrick, D.C., Fredrickson, J.W., 2001. Are you sure you have a strategy? Acad. Manag. Perspect. 15, 48-59. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2001.5897655. · DOI
  37. Hazen, B.T., Mollenkopf, D.A., Wang, Y., 2017. Remanufacturing for the circular economy: an examination of consumer switching behavior. Bus. Strat. Environ. 26, 451-464. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1929. · DOI
  38. Hazen, B.T., Russo, I., Confente, I., Pellathy, D., 2021. Supply chain management for circular economy: conceptual framework and research agenda. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2, 510-537. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-12-2019-0332. · DOI
  39. Hofmann, F., Jaeger-Erben, M., 2020. Organizational transition management of circular business model innovations. Bus. Strat. Environ. 29, 2770-2788. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/bse.2542. · DOI
  40. Hvass, K.K., Pedersen, E.R.G., 2019. Toward circular economy of fashion: experiences from a brand's product take-back initiative. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. 23, 345-365. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-04-2018-0059. · DOI
  41. Jaeger, B., Upadhyay, A., 2020. Understanding barriers to circular economy: cases from the manufacturing industry. J. Enterprise Inf. Manag. 33, 729-745. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/JEIM-02-2019-0047. · DOI
  42. Jakhar, S.K., Mangla, S.K., Luthra, S., Kusi-Sarpong, S., 2019. When stakeholder pressure drives the circular economy: measuring the mediating role of innovation capabilities. Manag. Decis. 57, 904-920. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2018- 0990. · DOI
  43. Jia, F., Yin, S., Chen, L., Chen, X., 2020. The circular economy in the textile and apparel industry: a systematic literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 259, 120728 https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120728. · DOI
  44. Kalmykova, Y., Sadagopan, M., Rosado, L., 2018. Circular economy -from review of theories and practices to development of implementation tools. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 135, 190-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.034. · DOI · Paper page
  45. Kazancoglu, I., Kazancoglu, Y., Kahraman, A., Yarimoglu, E., Soni, G., 2020. Investigating barriers to circular supply chain in the textile industry from stakeholders' perspective. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 13675567.2020.1846694. · DOI
  46. Kirchherr, J., Piscicelli, L., Bour, R., Kostense-Smit, E., Muller, J., Huibrechtse- Truijens, A., Hekkert, M., 2018. Barriers to the circular economy: evidence from the European union (EU). Ecol. Econ. 150, 264-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolecon.2018.04.028. · DOI · Paper page
  47. Kissling, R., Coughlan, D., Fitzpatrick, C., Boeni, H., Luepschen, C., Andrew, S., Dickenson, J., 2013. Success factors and barriers in re-use of electrical and electronic equipment. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 80, 21-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. resconrec.2013.07.009. · DOI
  48. Konietzko, J., Bocken, N.M.P., Hultink, E.J., 2020. Circular ecosystem innovation: an initial set of principles. J. Clean. Prod. 253, 119942 https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2019.119942. · DOI
  49. Kurilova-Palisaitiene, J., Sundin, E., Poksinska, B., 2018. Remanufacturing challenges and possible lean improvements. J. Clean. Prod. 172, 3225-3236. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.023. · DOI · Paper page
  50. Lieder, M., Rashid, A., 2016. Towards circular economy implementation: a comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry. J. Clean. Prod. 115, 36-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042. · DOI · Paper page
  51. Linder, M., Williander, M., 2017. Circular business model innovation: inherent uncertainties. Bus. Strat. Environ. 26, 182-196. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1906. · DOI
  52. Masi, D., Day, S., Godsell, J., 2017. Supply chain configurations in the circular economy: a systematic literature review. Sustainability 9, 1602. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su9091602. · DOI
  53. Meherishi, L., Narayana, S.A., Ranjani, K.S., 2019. Sustainable packaging for supply chain management in the circular economy: a review. J. Clean. Prod. 237, 117582 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.057. · DOI
  54. Merli, R., Preziosi, M., Acampora, A., 2018. How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 178, 703-722. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.112. · DOI
  55. Neligan, A., 2018. Digitalisation as enabler towards a sustainable circular economy in Germany. Intereconomics 53, 101-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-018-0729- 4. · DOI
  56. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., 2010. Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, p. 278.
  57. Paes, L.A.B., Bezerra, B.S., Deus, R.M., Jugend, D., Battistelle, R.A.G., 2019. Organic solid waste management in a circular economy perspective -a systematic review and SWOT analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 239, 118086 https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2019.118086. · DOI
  58. Pavel, S., 2018. Circular economy: the beauty of circularity in value chain. J. Econ. Bus. 1, 584-598. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1992.01.04.52. Pearce, D.W., Turner, R.K., 1990. Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, USA. · DOI
  59. Pedersen, E.R.G., Earley, R., Andersen, K.R., 2019. From singular to plural: exploring organizational complexities and circular business model design. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. 23, 308-326. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-04-2018-0062. · DOI
  60. Pinheiro, M.A.P., Seles, B.M.R.P., de Camargo Fiorini, P., Jugend, D., Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A.B., da Silva, H.M.R., Latan, H., 2019. The role of new product development in underpinning the circular economy: a systematic review and integrative framework. Manag. Decis. 57, 840-862. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD- 07-2018-0782. · DOI
  61. Porter, M., 1985. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press, New York.
  62. Prieto-Sandoval, V., Jaca, C., Santos, J., Baumgartner, R.J., Ormazabal, M., 2019. Key strategies, resources, and capabilities for implementing circular economy in industrial small and medium enterprises. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 26, 1473-1484. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1761. · DOI
  63. Ranta, V., Aarikka-Stenroos, L., Mäkinen, S.J., 2018. Creating value in the circular economy: a structured multiple-case analysis of business models. J. Clean. Prod. 201, 988-1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.072. · DOI
  64. Rizos, V., Behrens, A., van der Gaast, W., Hofman, E., Ioannou, A., Kafyeke, T., Flamos, A., Rinaldi, R., Papadelis, S., Hirschnitz-Garbers, M., Topi, C., 2016. Implementation of circular economy business models by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): barriers and enablers. Sustainability 8, 1212. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su8111212. · DOI · Paper page
  65. Rosa, P., Sassanelli, C., Terzi, S., 2019. Circular business models versus circular benefits: an assessment in the waste from electrical and electronic equipments sector. J. Clean. Prod. 231, 940-952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.310. · DOI
  66. Salmenperä, H., Pitkänen, K., Kautto, P., Saikku, L., 2021. Critical factors for enhancing the circular economy in waste management. J. Clean. Prod. 280, 124339 https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124339. · DOI
  67. Salvador, R., Barros, M.V., da Luz, L., Piekarski, C.M., de Francisco, A.C., 2020. Circular business models: current aspects that influence implementation and unaddressed subjects. J. Clean. Prod. 250, 119555 https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2019.119555. · DOI
  68. Salvador, R., Puglieri, F.N., Halog, A., Andrade, F., Piekarski, C.M., de Francisco, A.C., 2021. Key aspects for designing business models for a circular bioeconomy. J. Clean. Prod. 278, 124341 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124341. · DOI
  69. Sandvik, I.M., Stubbs, W., 2019. Circular fashion supply chain through textile-to-textile recycling. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. 23, 366-381. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-04- 2018-0058. · DOI
  70. Sarja, M., Onkila, T., Mäkelä, M., 2021. A systematic literature review of the transition to the circular economy in business organizations: obstacles, catalysts and ambivalences. J. Clean. Prod. 286, 125492 https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2020.125492. · DOI
  71. Sauerwein, M., Doubrovski, E., Balkenende, R., Bakker, C.A., 2019. Exploring the potential of additive manufacturing for product design in a circular economy. J. Clean. Prod. 226, 1138-1149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.108. · DOI
  72. Schallehn, H., Seuring, S., Strähle, J., Freise, M., 2019. Customer experience creation for after-use products: a product-service systems-based review. J. Clean. Prod. 210, 929-944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.292. · DOI
  73. Shahbazi, S., Wiktorsson, M., Kurdve, M., Jönsson, C., Bjelkemyr, M., 2016. Material efficiency in manufacturing: Swedish evidence on potential, barriers and strategies. J. Clean. Prod. 127, 438-450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.143. · DOI
  74. Singhal, D., Tripathy, S., Jena, S.K., 2019. Acceptance of remanufactured products in the circular economy: an empirical study in India. Manag. Decis. 57, 953-970. https:// doi.org/10.1108/MD-06-2018-0686. · DOI
  75. Spaargaren, G., Mol, A.P.J., 1992. Sociology, environment, and modernity: ecological modernization as a theory of social change. Soc. Nat. Resour. 5, 323-344. https:// doi.org/10.1080/08941929209380797. · DOI
  76. Sumter, D., de Koning, J., Bakker, C.A., Balkenende, R., 2020. Circular economy competencies for design. Sustainability 12, 1561. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su12041561. · DOI
  77. Svensson, N., Funck, E.K., 2019. Management control in circular economy. Exploring and theorizing the adaptation of management control to circular business models. J. Clean. Prod. 233, 390-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.089. · DOI
  78. Tesfaye, W., Kitaw, D., 2021. Conceptualizing reverse logistics to plastics recycling system. Soc. Responsib. J. 17, 686-702. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-12-2019- 0411. · DOI
  79. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., Smart, P., 2003. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br. J. Manag. 14, 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375. · DOI · Paper page
  80. Tukker, A., 2015. Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy -a review. J. Clean. Prod. 97, 76-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.049. · DOI · Paper page
  81. Tura, N., Hanski, J., Ahola, T., Ståhle, M., Piiparinen, S., Valkokari, P., 2019. Unlocking circular business: a framework of barriers and drivers. J. Clean. Prod. 212, 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.202. · DOI
  82. Van Weelden, E., Mugge, R., Bakker, C.A., 2016. Paving the way towards circular consumption: exploring consumer acceptance of refurbished mobile phones in the Dutch market. J. Clean. Prod. 113, 743-754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2015.11.065. · DOI
  83. Vegter, D., van Hillegersberg, J., Olthaar, M., 2020. Supply chains in circular business models: processes and performance objectives. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 162, 105046 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105046. · DOI
  84. Vehmas, K., Raudaskoski, A., Heikkilä, P., Harlin, A., Mensonen, A., 2018. Consumer attitudes and communication in circular fashion. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. 22, 286-300. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-08-2017-0079. · DOI
  85. Vogt Duberg, J., Johansson, G., Sundin, E., Kurilova-Palisaitiene, J., 2020. Prerequisite factors for original equipment manufacturer remanufacturing. J. Clean. Prod. 270, 122309 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122309. · DOI
  86. Wang, Y., Hazen, B.T., 2016. Consumer product knowledge and intention to purchase remanufactured products. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 181, 460-469. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.08.031. · DOI
  87. Wernerfelt, B., 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strat. Manag. J. 5, 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207. · DOI · Paper page
  88. Yang, M., Evans, S., 2019. Product-service system business model archetypes and sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 220, 1156-1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2019.02.067. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eisenreich, A., Füller, J., Stuchtey, M., & Gimenez-Jimenez, D.
Affiliations
  • Universität Innsbruck (AT)
  • TU Dortmund University (DE)
Corresponding author
Eisenreich, Anja
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-12
Volume
378
Pages
134375
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4297494200
Cited by
154
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 16
FWCI
18.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digital Library of the University of Innsbruck (University of Innsbruck) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Sustainable Industrial Ecology
Keywords
circular economy, circular value chains, stakeholder collaboration, consumer perception, Industry 4.0, performance measurement, top management support, organizational culture, strategic decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review