The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Links between circular economy and climate change mitigation in the built environment
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The construction sector represents one of the most significant sources of waste generation in the European Union (EU), with nearly one billion tonnes of construction and demolition waste annually. This sector also contributes a third of the annual EU greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Accordingly, construction represents one priority area for intervention within the EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy. Increasing resource efficiency through slowing, closing, and narrowing material and energy loops, is key to mitigating climate change. However, this review paper demonstrates that the analysis of links between circular economy solutions and climate change mitigation has been scarce, despite a recent sharp increase in related literature, with 20 articles (83%) published in 2018–2019. Slowing resource solutions have been the focus of the research and could bring up to 99% savings in GHG emissions per functional unit, where material reuse stands out as the most promising alternative. Closing resource solutions can reduce emissions by 30–50% per functional unit, but results are highly dependent on recycling efficiencies and transportation distances to recovery facilities. Solutions for narrowing resource loops can bring additional GHG savings, but they remain understudied. Despite the promising results for mitigating GHG emissions, this article argues that the circular economy solutions do not always result by default in emission reductions and that a case-by-case quantification is crucial. The implementation of these solutions should be accompanied with further methodological development, such as proper allocation procedures, accurate definition of the system boundaries and integration of forecasts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005 · Cited by 8,550
Industrial ecology in integrated assessment models
Pauliuk, S., Arvesen, A., Stadler, K., & Hertwich, E. G. (2017) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate3148 · Cited by 288
Esa, M. R., Halog, A., & Rigamonti, L. (2017) · Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management · doi:10.1007/s10163-016-0516-x · Cited by 275
Understanding and overcoming the barriers to structural steel reuse, a UK perspective
Densley Tingley, D., Cooper, S., & Cullen, J. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.006 · Cited by 261
Petersen, A. K., & Solberg, B. (2005) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/s1389-9341(03)00063-7 · Cited by 222
The greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation options for materials used in UK construction
Giesekam, J., Barrett, J., Taylor, P., & Owen, A. (2014) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.04.035 · Cited by 202
An investigation on the recycling of hydrated cement from concrete demolition waste
Gastaldi, D., Canonico, F., Capelli, L., Buzzi, L., Boccaleri, E., & Irico, S. (2015) · Cement and Concrete Composites · doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.04.010 · Cited by 135
Recovery and reuse of structural products from end-of-life buildings
Hopkinson, P., Chen, H.-M., Zhou, K., Wang, Y., & Lam, D. (2019) · Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering Sustainability · doi:10.1680/jensu.18.00007 · Cited by 115
Self-citationReal and perceived barriers to steel reuse across the UK construction value chain
Dunant, C. F., Drewniok, M. P., Sansom, M., Corbey, S., Allwood, J. M., & Cullen, J. M. (2017) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.036 · Cited by 88
Material savings through structural steel reuse: A case study in Genoa
Pongiglione, M., & Calderini, C. (2014) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.02.011 · Cited by 69
Cited by
Circular economy in the building and construction sector: a scientific evolution analysis
Norouzi, M., Chàfer, M., Cabeza, L. F., Jiménez, L., & Boer, D. (2021) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102704 · Cited by 482
Building materials in a circular economy: The case of wood waste as CO2-sink in bio concrete
Caldas, L. R., Saraiva, A. B., Lucena, A. F. P., Da Gloria, M. Y., Santos, A. S., & Filho, R. D. T. (2021) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105346 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Gallego-Schmid, A., Chen, H.-M., Sharmina, M., & Mendoza, J. M. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-07
- Volume
- 260
- Pages
- 121115
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3012068982
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 41.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Links between circular economy and climate change mitigation in the built environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121115
- The paper
- Gallego-Schmid, A., Chen, H.-M., Sharmina, M., & Mendoza, J. M. F. (2020). Links between circular economy and climate change mitigation in the built environment. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121115
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.