Cited by 120Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementSustainable Design and DevelopmentGreen IT and Sustainability

Durability of smartphones: A technical analysis of reliability and repairability aspects

Open access
Cordella, Mauro, Alfieri, Felice, Clemm, Christian, Berwald, Anton·2021·Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract

Smartphones are available on the market with a variety of design characteristics and purchase prices. Recent trends show that their replacement cycle has become on average shorter than two years, which comes with environmental impacts that could be mitigated through a prolonged use of such devices. This paper analyses limiting states and design trends affecting the durability of smartphones, and identifies reliability and repairability measures to extend the product lifetime. Technical trade-offs between reliability and repairability aspects are also discussed. Smartphones are often replaced prematurely because of socio-economic and technical reasons. Specific hardware parts (e.g. display, battery, back cover), as well as software, can be critical. Improving the reliability of smartphones can reduce the occurrence of early replacements. Apart from the bottom-line consideration of reliability aspects for electronics, this can be pursued through the design of devices which: i) are resistant to mechanical stresses; ii) implement durable batteries; iii) offer sufficient adaptability to future conditions of use (e.g. in terms of software/firmware updates, memory and storage capacity). However, if and when failures occur, repairs have to be rapid and economically viable. This can be facilitated through modular design concepts, ease of disassembly of key parts, availability of spare parts and repair services. As common elements of the two strategies, easily-available instructions on use, maintenance and repair are also needed. The analysis of devices on the market suggests that it is possible to design satisfactorily reliable devices without compromising repairability excessively. However, trade-offs between these two aspects can occur. Considerations about reliability and/or repairability should be integrated in the design of all smartphones. The findings of this paper can be used by decision makers (e.g. manufacturers, designers, consumers and policy makers) interested in enhancing the durability of smartphones. This is particularly timely considering the policy attention on smartphones at the EU level.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125388

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A high level of technical knowledge is required to disassemble and reassemble high-quality smartphones, such as Apple, for repairs.

    “Furthermore, a high level of technical knowledge is required to disassemble and reassemble [51] high-quality smartphones, such as Apple, for repairs [52].”

    From Unveiling Environmental Potential in Smartphone Repair Practices in Vientiane Capital, Laos (2025) · cites this paper as [51]

    The Results (Repairability analysis; page unavailable) say that removing batteries from recent smartphone models requires an experienced repairer and that disassembly and reassembly can be barriers to repair. The paper does not establish that a high level of technical knowledge is required for high-quality smartphones specifically, or identify Apple phones as an example. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Alfieri F. Cordella M. Sanfelix J. Dodd N. An approach to the assessment of durability of energy-related products Procedia CIRP 69 2018 878 891 10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.082 · DOI
  2. Allwood J.M. Ashbya M.F. Gutowski T.G. Worrell E. Material efficiency: a white paper. Resources Conserv. Recycl. 55 3 2011 362 381 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.11.002 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Andrae A.S.G. Collection rate and reliability are the main sustainability determinants of current fast-paced, small, and short-lived ICT products WSEAS Trans. Environ. Dev. 14 2018 531 540 https://www.wseas.org/multimedia/journals/environment/2018/b125115-097.pdf accessed 12 August 2020
  4. Andrae A.S.G. Vaija M.S. Halgand S. Method for determining the circularity score of ICT goods Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering & Management (IJAREM) 6 1 2020 1 15 http://www.ijarem.org/papers/v6-i1/1.IJAREM-D5113.pdf accessed 12 August 2020
  5. Bakker C. Wang F. Huisman J. den Hollander M. Products that go round: exploring product life extension through design J. Clean. Prod. 69 2014 10 16 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.028 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Belkhir L. Elmeligi A. Assessing ICT global emissions footprint: trends to 2040 & recommendations J. Clean. Prod. 177 10 2018 448 463 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.239 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Cerulli-Harms A. Suter J. Landzaat W. Duke C. Rodriguez Diaz A. Porsch L. Peroz T. Kettner S. Thorun C. Svatikova K. Vermeulen J. Smit T. Dekeulenaer F. Lucica E. Behavioural Study on Consumers’ Engagement in the Circular Economy - Final Report 2018 Publications Office of the European Union Luxembourg 978-92-9200-885-7 10.2818/956512 2018 · DOI
  8. Clemm C. Sinai C. Ferkinghoff C. Dethlefs N. Nissen N.F. Lang K.D. Durability and Cycle Frequency of Smartphone and Tablet Lithium-Ion Batteries in the Field 2016 Electronics Goes Green 2016+ (EGG) Berlin (DE) 1 7 10.1109/EGG.2016.7829849 2016 · DOI
  9. Cordella M. Alfieri F. Sanfelix J. Analysis and Development of a Scoring System for Repair and Upgrade of Products: Final Report 2019 Publications Office of the European Union Luxembourg 978-92-76-01602-1 10.2760/725068 2019 · DOI
  10. Cordella M. Alfieri F. Sanfelix J. Donatello S. Kaps R. Wolf O. Improving material efficiency in the life cycle of products: a review of EU Ecolabel criteria 25 2020 921 935 10.1007/s11367-019-01608-8 · DOI
  11. Cordella M. Alfieri F. Sanfelix Forner J. Guide for the Assessment of Material Efficiency: Application to Smartphones 2020 Publications Office of the European Union Luxembourg 978-92-76-15411-2 10.2760/037522 2020 · DOI
  12. European Environment Agency Circular by Design. Products in the Circular Economy 2017 Publications Office of the European Union Luxembourg 978-92-9213-857-8 10.2800/860754 2017 · DOI
  13. Flipsen B. Huisken M. Opsomer T. Depypere M. Smartphone repairability scoring: assessing the self-repair potential of mobile ICT devices Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 3rd PLATE Conference, Berlin (DE), 18-20 September 2019 2019
  14. Groot J. State-of-health Estimation of Li-Ion Batteries: Ageing Models Ph.D. Thesis 2014 Chalmers University of Technology (SE) http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/205605/205605.pdf accessed 19 May 2020
  15. Huysman S. Sala S. Mancini L. Ardente F. Alvarenga R.A.F. De Meester S. Mathieux F. Dewulf J. Toward a systematized framework for resource efficiency indicators Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 95 2015 68 76 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.10.014 · DOI
  16. Iraldo F. Facheris C. Nucci B. Is product durability better for environment and for economic efficiency? A comparative assessment applying LCA and LCC to two energy-intensive products J. Clean. Prod. 140 3 2017 1353 1364 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.017 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Makov T. Fitzpatrick C. Planned obsolescence in smartphones? Insights from benchmark testing Proceedings of the 3rd PLATE Conference, Berlin (DE), 18-20 September 2019 2019
  18. Sanfelix F. Cordella M. Alfieri F. Methods for the Assessment of the Repairability and Upgradability of Energy-Related Products: Application to TVs 2019 Publications Office of the European Union Luxembourg 978-92-76-11254-9 10.2760/501525 2019 · DOI
  19. Schischke K. Proske M. Nissen N.F. Lang K. Modular Products: Smartphone Design from a Circular Economy Perspective 2016 Electronics Goes Green 2016+ (EGG) Berlin 1 8 10.1109/EGG.2016.7829810 2016 · DOI
  20. Suckling J. Lee J. Redefining scope: the true environmental impact of smartphones? Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 20 8 2015 1181 1196 10.1007/s11367-015-0909-4 · DOI
  21. Tecchio P. Ardente F. Mathieux F. Analysis of Durability, Reusability and Repairability: Application to Washing Machines and Dishwashers 2016 2016 Publications Office of the European Union Luxemburg 978-92-79-60790-5 10.2788/630157 · DOI
  22. Vanegas P. Peeters J.R. Cattrysse D. Tecchio P. Ardente F. Mathieux F. Dewulf W. Duflou J.R. Ease of disassembly of products to support circular economy strategies Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 135 2018 323 334 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.06.022 30078953 PMC5989810 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cordella, M., Alfieri, F., Clemm, C., & Berwald, A.
Affiliations
  • European Commission (BE)
  • Fraunhofer Institute for Reliability and Microintegration (DE)
Corresponding author
Cordella, Mauro
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
286
Pages
125388
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3108895169
Cited by
120
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8
FWCI
12.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TECNALIA Publications (Fundación TECNALIA Research & Innovation) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
  • Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • EPS
  • European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (820331)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Green IT and Sustainability
Keywords
smartphones, product durability, reliability, repairability, modular design, product life extension, battery durability, environmental impact of electronics, spare parts availability, repair service, design trade-offs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review