Cited by 758Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityEnvironmental Education and SustainabilityNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Avoiding food waste by Romanian consumers: The importance of planning and shopping routines

Open access
Stefan, Violeta, van Herpen, Erica, Tudoran, Ana Alina, Lähteenmäki, Liisa·2013·Food Quality and Preference

Abstract

Food waste is generated in immense amounts across the food life cycle, imposing serious environmental, social and economic consequences. Although consumers are the single biggest contributor to this volume, little is known about the drivers of food waste in households. This exploratory study aims to investigate the role of food choices and other food-related activities in producing food waste. A survey of 244 Romanian consumers examined the influence of intentions not to waste food, planning and shopping routines, as well as moral attitudes and lack of concern towards wasting food, a subjective norm of disapproval towards food waste, and perceived behavioural control on consumers’ self-reported food waste. Results show that consumers’ planning and shopping routines are important predictors of food waste. Planning and shopping routines are determined by moral attitudes towards food waste and perceived behavioural control. This implies that in order to change consumers’ food waste behaviour, efforts should be directed towards providing consumers with skills and tools to deal with their food-related activities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.11.001

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At the consumer level, planning, shopping, and stockpiling routines are important predictors of waste.

    “At the consumer level, planning, shopping and stockpiling routines are important predictors of waste (Wansink and Deshpand e, 1994;Chandon and Wansink, 2002;Stefan et al., 2013).”

    From Food waste paradox: antecedents of food disposal in low income households (2015) · cites this paper as Stefan et al., 2013

    The Results (section 3.2) and Discussion (section 4) identify planning and shopping routines as predictors of consumers’ food waste. The passages do not establish stockpiling routines as a separate predictor, so that part of the sentence is not supported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Stefan et al. found that higher household income leads to more waste.

    “While Gustavsson et al. (2011) state that poverty and limited household income make it unacceptable to waste food and Stefan et al. (2013) found that higher household income leads to more waste, Cox and Dowling (2007) found that low-income families tend to waste more food.”

    From Food waste paradox: antecedents of food disposal in low income households (2015) · cites this paper as Stefan et al., 2013

    Section 3.1 reports a positive correlation between household income and self-reported food waste among Romanian respondents (r = .14, p = .026). It does not establish that higher income causes more waste; the authors describe the correlation as relatively low and exclude income from their structural model. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The intention not to waste food does not have a significant effect on reported food waste when planning and shopping routines are included as additional factors in the model.

    “In contrast to these findings, however, a study that included planning and shopping routines as additional factors in the model shows that the intention not to waste food does not have a significant effect on reported food waste (Stefan et al., 2013).”
  • Concern about food waste plays an important role in the intention to reduce food waste.

    “and plays an important role in the intention to reduce food waste (Mond ejar-Jim enez et al., 2016;Stancu et al., 2016;Stefan et al., 2013).”
  • The creation of food waste is not driven by conscious intentions and food-related household practices seem to be a better indicator for the amount of food wasted.

    “Stefan et al. (2013) explain that by the fact that the creation of food waste is not driven by conscious intentions and that food-related household practices (see Section 3.3) seem to be a better indicator for the amount of food wasted.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stefan, V., van Herpen, E., Tudoran, A. A., & Lähteenmäki, L.
Affiliations
Aarhus University (DK)
Venue
Food Quality and Preference
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
375-381
ISSN
0950-3293 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2122630365
Cited by
750
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 88 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 97 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
FWCI
12.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Food Quality and Preference (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
household food waste, food waste prevention, consumer behavior, meal planning, moral attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, food choice, Romanian consumers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review