CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 71

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Circular supply chain governance: A qualitative-empirical study of the European polyurethane industry to facilitate functional circular supply chain management

Schultz, Felix Carl, Everding, Sebastian, Pies, Ingo·2021·Journal of Cleaner Production
DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128445
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128445

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. Ahi, 2013, A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management, J. Clean. Prod., 52, 329, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.018 · DOI
  2. Akindoyo, 2016, Polyurethane types, synthesis and applications – a review, RSC Adv., 6, 114453, 10.1039/C6RA14525F · DOI
  3. Alvarez, 2010, Nestlé Nespresso AAA sustainable quality program: an investigation into the governance dynamics in a multi-stakeholder supply chain network, Supply Chain Manag.: An Int. J., 15, 165, 10.1108/13598541011028769 · DOI
  4. Ariño, 2016, Publishing qualitative research in academy of management discoveries, Acad. Manag. Discov., 2, 109, 10.5465/amd.2016.0034 · DOI
  5. Batista, 2018, In search of a circular supply chain archetype – a content-analysis-based literature review, Prod. Plann. Contr., 29, 438, 10.1080/09537287.2017.1343502 · DOI
  6. Beckmann, 2014, Commitment strategies for sustainability: how business firms can transform trade-offs into win-win outcomes, Bus Strat. Environ, 23, 18, 10.1002/bse.1758 · DOI
  7. Berry, 2002, Validity and reliability issues in elite interviewing, PS Political Sci. Polit., 35, 679, 10.1017/S1049096502001166 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Bocken, 2017, Taking the circularity to the next level: a special issue on the circular Economy, J. Ind. Ecol., 21, 476, 10.1111/jiec.12606 · DOI
  9. Boström, 2015, Sustainable and responsible supply chain governance: challenges and opportunities, J. Clean. Prod., 107, 1, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.050 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Bressanelli, 2019, Challenges in supply chain redesign for the Circular Economy: a literature review and a multiple case study, Int. J. Prod. Res., 57, 7395, 10.1080/00207543.2018.1542176 · DOI
  11. Brice, 2019, 2019. PU players target circular economies. Urethanes Technology International, 36 (35th Anniversary Issue, 26
  12. Brockhaus, 2013, Where do we go from here? progressing sustainability implementation efforts across supply chains, J. Bus. Logist., 34, 167, 10.1111/jbl.12017 · DOI
  13. Carter, 2008, A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory, Int, J. Phys. Distr. & Log. Manag, 38, 360
  14. Chen, 2004, Understanding supply chain management: critical research and a theoretical framework, Int. J. Prod. Res., 42, 131, 10.1080/00207540310001602865 · DOI
  15. Chen, 2017, Supply chain collaboration for sustainability: a literature review and future research agenda. Int, J. Prod. Econ, 194, 73, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.04.005 · DOI
  16. Crosina, 2019, Toward a model of organizational mourning: the case of former Lehman Brothers bankers, Acad. Manag. J., 62, 66, 10.5465/amj.2017.0140 · DOI
  17. De Oliveira, 2019, Paving the way for the circular economy and more sustainable supply chains, Manag. Environ. Qual. Int. J., 30, 1095, 10.1108/MEQ-01-2019-0005 · DOI
  18. De Angelis, 2018, Supply chain management and the circular economy: towards the circular supply chain, Prod. Plann. Contr., 29, 425, 10.1080/09537287.2018.1449244 · DOI
  19. Farooque, 2019, Circular supply chain management: a definition and structured literature review, J. Clean. Prod., 228, 882, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.303 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Fischer, 2017, Institutional incentives in circular economy transition: the case of material use in the Dutch textile industry, J. Clean. Prod., 155, 17, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.038 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Formentini, 2016, Corporate sustainability approaches and governance mechanisms in sustainable supply chain management, J. Clean. Prod., 112, 1920, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.072 · DOI
  22. Genovese, 2017, Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: evidence and some applications, Omega, 66, 344, 10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.015 · DOI
  23. Gereffi, 2005, The governance of global value chains, Rev. Int. Pol. Econ, 12, 78, 10.1080/09692290500049805 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Gimenez, 2013, Sustainable supply chains: governance mechanisms to greening suppliers, J. Bus. Ethics, 116, 189, 10.1007/s10551-012-1458-4 · DOI
  25. Gimenez, 2012, Extending sustainability to suppliers: a systematic literature review, Supply Chain Manag. An Int. J., 17, 531, 10.1108/13598541211258591 · DOI
  26. Gioia, 2013, Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: notes on the Gioia methodology, Organ. Res. Methods, 16, 15, 10.1177/1094428112452151 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Govindan, 2018, A systematic review on drivers, barriers, and practices towards circular economy: a supply chain perspective. Int, J. Prod. Res., 56, 278, 10.1080/00207543.2017.1402141 · DOI
  28. Govindan, 2016, Accelerating the transition towards sustainability dynamics into supply chain relationship management and governance structures, J. Clean. Prod., 112, 1813, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.084 · DOI
  29. Gurtu, 2015, An analysis of keywords used in the literature on green supply chain management, Manag. Res. Rev., 38, 166, 10.1108/MRR-06-2013-0157 · DOI
  30. Handcock, 2011, Comment: on the concept of snowball sampling, Socio. Methodol., 41, 367, 10.1111/j.1467-9531.2011.01243.x · DOI
  31. Hansen, 2020, Circular value creation architectures: make, ally, buy, or laissez-faire, J. Ind. Ecol., 10.1111/jiec.13016 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Howard, 2019, The regenerative supply chain: a framework for developing circular economy indicators. Int, J. Prod. Res., 57, 7300, 10.1080/00207543.2018.1524166 · DOI
  33. Hussain, 2020, Organizational enablers for circular economy in the context of sustainable supply chain management, J. Clean. Prod., 256, 120375, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120375 · DOI
  34. Kazancoglu, 2018, A new holistic conceptual framework for green supply chain management performance assessment based on circular economy, J. Clean. Prod., 195, 1282, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.015 · DOI
  35. Kirchherr, 2019, Research on the circular economy: a critique of the field, Res., Cons. and Rec., 151, 104480, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104480 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Koberg, 2019, A systematic review of sustainable supply chain management in global supply chains, J. Clean. Prod., 207, 1084, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.033 · DOI
  37. Korhonen, 2018, Circular economy: the concept and its limitations. Ecol, Econ. Times, 143, 37
  38. Korhonen, 2018, Circular economy as an essentially contested concept, J. Clean. Prod., 175, 544, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.111 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Lahane, 2020, Circular supply chain management: a state-of-art review and future opportunities, J. Clean. Prod., 258, 120859, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120859 · DOI
  40. Larrain, 2020, Economic performance of pyrolysis of mixed plastic waste: open-loop versus closed-loop recycling, J. Clean. Prod., 270, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122442 · DOI
  41. Lai, 2014, The role of customer integration in extended producer responsibility: a study of Chinese export manufacturers. Int, J. Prod. Econ, 147, 284, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.06.028 · DOI
  42. Lemke, 2013, Teaching reputational risk management in the supply chain, Supply chain manag.: an int. J., 18, 413, 10.1108/SCM-06-2012-0222 · DOI
  43. Mayring, 2000, Qualitative content analysis [28 paragraphs]. Forum qualitative sozialforschung, Forum Qual. Soc. Res., 1
  44. Murray, 2017, The circular economy: an interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context, J. Bus. Ethics, 140, 369, 10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Nasir, 2017, Comparing linear and circular supply chains: a case study from the construction industry, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 183, 443, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.06.008 · DOI
  46. Panigrahi, 2019, Sustainable supply chain management: a review of literature and implications for future research, Manag. Environ. Qual. Int. J., 30, 1001, 10.1108/MEQ-01-2018-0003 · DOI
  47. Petersen, 2015, Mitigating reputational risks in supply chains, Supply Chain Manag.: an Int. J., 20, 495, 10.1108/SCM-09-2014-0320 · DOI
  48. Pilbeam, 2012, The governance of supply networks: a systematic literature review, Supply Chain Manag.: an Int. J., 17, 358, 10.1108/13598541211246512 · DOI
  49. Pies, 2010, Value creation, management competencies, and global corporate citizenship: an ordonomic approach to business ethics in the age of globalization, J. Bus. Ethics, 94, 265, 10.1007/s10551-009-0263-1 · DOI
  50. Pies, 2014, The political role of the business firm: an ordonomic concept of corporate citizenship developed in comparison with the aristotelian idea of individual citizenship. Bus, For. Soc., 53, 226
  51. Pies, 2009, Moral commitments and the societal role of business: an ordonomic approach to corporate citizenship. Bus, Ethics Q, 19, 375, 10.5840/beq200919322 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Pies, 2020, Do hybrids impede sustainability? How semantic reorientations and governance reforms can produce and preserve sustainability in sharing business models, J. Bus. Res., 115, 174, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.024 · DOI
  53. Potting, 2017, Circular economy: measuring innovation in the product chain, PBL – Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
  54. Sancha, 2016, Buyer-supplier relationships on environmental issues: a contingency perspective, J. Clean. Prod., 112, 1849, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.026 · DOI
  55. Simón, 2018, Recycling of polyurethanes from laboratory to industry, a journey towards the sustainability, Waste Manag., 76, 147, 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.041 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Soylu, 2006, Synergy analysis of collaborative supply chain management in energy systems using multi-period MILP, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 174, 387, 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.02.042 · DOI
  57. Strike, 2016, Mediated sensemaking, Acad. Manag. J., 59, 880, 10.5465/amj.2012.0665 · DOI
  58. Tachizawa, 2015, The performance of green supply chain management governance mechanisms: a supply network and complexity perspective, J. Supply Chain Manag., 51, 18, 10.1111/jscm.12072 · DOI
  59. Ugarte, 2018, Towards circular economy: different strategies for polyurethane waste recycling and the obtaining of new products, Proceedings, 2, 1490
  60. Vermeulen, 2009, Sustainability through the market - the impacts of sustainable supply chain management: introduction, Sustain. Dev., 17, 269, 10.1002/sd.422 · DOI
  61. Voss, 2002, Case research in operations management, Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag., 22, 195, 10.1108/01443570210414329 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Vurro, 2009, Shaping sustainable value chains: network determinants of supply chain governance models, J. Bus. Ethics, 90, 607, 10.1007/s10551-010-0595-x · DOI
  63. Williamson, 1983, Credible commitments: using hostages to support ex-change, Am. Econ. Rev., 73, 519
  64. Williamson, 1998, Transaction cost economics: how it works; where it is headed, Economist, 146, 23, 10.1023/A:1003263908567 · DOI
  65. Williamson, 2010, Transaction cost economics: the natural progression, Am. Econ. Rev., 100, 673, 10.1257/aer.100.3.673 · DOI
  66. Yang, 2018, Governance mechanisms for green supply chain partnership, Sustainability, 10, 2681, 10.3390/su10082681 · DOI
  67. Zhang, 2015, Consumer environmental awareness and channel coordination with two substitutable products, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 241, 63, 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.07.043 · DOI
  68. Zhu, 2017, The role of customer relational governance in environmental and economic performance improvement through green supply chain management, J. Clean. Prod., 155, 46, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.124 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 71

Metadata

Authors
Schultz, F. C., Everding, S., & Pies, I.
ORCID
Schultz, Felix Carl
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-10
Volume
317
Pages
128445
ISSN
0959-6526
DOI
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128445
Cited by
71
References
3
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review