CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 38

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Thematic evolution and trends linking sustainability and project management: Scientific mapping using SciMAT

Gibbin, Randal Victor, Sigahi, Tiago F.A.C., Pinto, Jefferson de Souza, Rampasso, Izabela Simon, Anholon, Rosley·2023·Journal of Cleaner Production
DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137753
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137753

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 109

  1. Aarseth, 2017, Project sustainability strategies: a systematic literature review, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 35, 1071, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.11.006 · DOI
  2. Abarca, 2020, Working in virtual teams: a systematic literature review and a bibliometric analysis, IEEE Access, 8, 168923, 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3023546 · DOI
  3. Abbas, 2019, Impact of knowledge management practices on green innovation and corporate sustainable development: a structural analysis, J. Clean. Prod., 229, 611, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.024 · DOI
  4. Akomea-Frimpong, 2022, Green finance for green buildings: a systematic review and conceptual foundation, J. Clean. Prod., 356, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131869 · DOI
  5. Argento, 2022, The facets of the sustainability paradox, Meditari Account. Res., 30, 26, 10.1108/MEDAR-10-2020-1051 · DOI
  6. Armenia, 2019, Sustainable project management: a conceptualization-oriented review and a framework proposal for future studies, Sustainability, 11, 2664, 10.3390/su11092664 · DOI
  7. Baba, 2021, Managing project sustainability in the extractive industries: towards a reciprocity framework for community engagement, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 39, 887, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.09.002 · DOI
  8. Bag, 2021, Key resources for industry 4.0 adoption and its effect on sustainable production and circular economy: an empirical study, J. Clean. Prod., 281, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125233 · DOI
  9. Banihashemi, 2017, Critical success factors (CSFs) for integration of sustainability into construction project management practices in developing countries, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 35, 1103, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.01.014 · DOI
  10. Beauséjour, 2009, Managing delivery of sanitation infrastructures for poor communities, Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus., 2, 355, 10.1108/17538370910971027 · DOI
  11. Bolis, 2023, Contribution of ergonomics and human factors to sustainable development: a systematic literature review, Ergonomics, 66, 303, 10.1080/00140139.2022.2079729 · DOI
  12. Bonilla-Chaves, 2023, Exploring the evolution of human resource analytics: a bibliometric study, Behav. Sci., 13, 244, 10.3390/bs13030244 · DOI
  13. Callon, 1991, Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: the case of polymer chemsitry, Scientometrics, 22, 155, 10.1007/BF02019280 · DOI
  14. Cerne, 2019, Projectification of sustainable development: implications from a critical review, Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus., 12, 356, 10.1108/IJMPB-04-2018-0079 · DOI
  15. Chow, 2021, Impact of sustainable project management on project plan and project success of the manufacturing firm: structural model assessment, PLoS One, 16, 10.1371/journal.pone.0259819 · DOI
  16. Christie, 2005, Is integrated coastal management sustainable?, Ocean Coast Manag., 48, 208, 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2005.04.002 · DOI
  17. Cobo, 2011, An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: a practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field, J. Inform., 5, 146, 10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002 · DOI
  18. Cobo, 2012, SciMAT: a new science mapping analysis software tool, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 63, 1609, 10.1002/asi.22688 · DOI
  19. Cobo, 2015, 25years at Knowledge-Based Systems: a bibliometric analysis, Knowl. Base Syst., 80, 3, 10.1016/j.knosys.2014.12.035 · DOI
  20. Daniel, 2022, Multi-level perspective framework in macro project studies: towards a complex project organizing approach to sustainability transitions, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 40, 865, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.10.001 · DOI
  21. Doskočil, 2018, Risk management and knowledge management as critical success factors of sustainability projects, Sustainability, 10, 1438, 10.3390/su10051438 · DOI
  22. Edum-Fotwe, 2009, A social ontology for appraising sustainability of construction projects and developments, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 27, 313, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.04.003 · DOI
  23. Ellegaard, 2015, The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: how great is the impact?, Scientometrics, 105, 1809, 10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z · DOI
  24. Ershadi, 2021, Core capabilities for achieving sustainable construction project management, Sustain. Prod. Consum., 28, 1396, 10.1016/j.spc.2021.08.020 · DOI
  25. Fafaliou, 2022, Firms' ESG reputational risk and market longevity: a firm-level analysis for the United States, J. Bus. Res., 149, 161, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.010 · DOI
  26. Fathalizadeh, 2021, Barriers impeding sustainable project management: a Social Network Analysis of the Iranian construction sector, J. Clean. Prod., 318, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128405 · DOI
  27. Fathalizadeh, 2022, Barriers to sustainable construction project management: the case of Iran, Smart Sustain. Built Environ., 11, 717, 10.1108/SASBE-09-2020-0132 · DOI
  28. Fernández-Sánchez, 2010, A methodology to identify sustainability indicators in construction project management—application to infrastructure projects in Spain, Ecol. Indicat., 10, 1193, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.04.009 · DOI
  29. Friedrich, 2023, A systematic literature review concerning the different interpretations of the role of sustainability in project management, Manag. Rev. Quarterly, 73, 31
  30. Furstenau, 2020, Link between sustainability and industry 4.0: trends, challenges and new perspectives, IEEE Access, 8, 140079, 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3012812 · DOI
  31. Galloway, 2003, The mission of the civil engineer in the movement of globalization, Leader. Manag. Eng., 3, 122, 10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2003)3:3(122) · DOI
  32. Ganglmair-Wooliscroft, 2022, An investigation of sustainable consumption behavior systems – exploring personal and socio-structural characteristics in different national contexts, J. Bus. Res., 148, 161, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.049 · DOI
  33. Garcia-Buendia, 2021, 22 Years of Lean Supply Chain Management: a science mapping-based bibliometric analysis, Int. J. Prod. Res., 59, 1901, 10.1080/00207543.2020.1794076 · DOI
  34. Gaviria-Marin, 2019, Knowledge management: a global examination based on bibliometric analysis, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 140, 194, 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.006 · DOI
  35. Ghobakhloo, 2022, Identifying industry 5.0 contributions to sustainable development: a strategy roadmap for delivering sustainability values, Sustain. Prod. Consum., 33, 716, 10.1016/j.spc.2022.08.003 · DOI
  36. Goh, 2014, Renewable energy project: project management, challenges and risk, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 38, 917, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.078 · DOI
  37. Golinska, 2015, Grey Decision Making as a tool for the classification of the sustainability level of remanufacturing companies, J. Clean. Prod., 105, 28, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.040 · DOI
  38. Govindaras, 2023, Sustainable environment to prevent burnout and attrition in project management, Sustainability, 15, 2364, 10.3390/su15032364 · DOI
  39. Greenland, 2022, Sustainable management education and an empirical five-pillar model of sustainability, Int. J. Manag. Educ., 20
  40. Guedes, 2009, Sustainable architecture and urban design in Portugal: an overview, Renew. Energy, 34, 1999, 10.1016/j.renene.2009.02.014 · DOI
  41. Hadinoto, 2022, Beyond tablets' physical characteristics: incorporating environmental sustainability metrics into the selection of lubricants for pharmaceutical tableting, J. Clean. Prod., 362, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132336 · DOI
  42. Hedge, 2013, Green buildings need good ergonomics, Ergonomics, 56, 492, 10.1080/00140139.2012.718367 · DOI
  43. Herath, 2021, Key components and critical success factors for project management success: a literature review, Operat. Supply Chain Manag.: Int. J., 431, 10.31387/oscm0470314 · DOI
  44. Hwang, 2013, Project management knowledge and skills for green construction: overcoming challenges, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 31, 272, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.05.004 · DOI
  45. Jeurissen, 2000, John elkington, cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business, J. Bus. Ethics, 23, 229, 10.1023/A:1006129603978 · DOI
  46. Jones, 2006, Trying harder: developing a new sustainable strategy for the UK, Nat. Resour. Forum, 30, 124, 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2006.00165.x · DOI
  47. Kain, 2008, Management of complex knowledge in planning for sustainable development: the use of multi-criteria decision aids, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 28, 7, 10.1016/j.eiar.2007.03.007 · DOI
  48. Khalifeh, 2020, The impact of project sustainability management (PSM) on project success, J. Manag. Dev., 39, 453, 10.1108/JMD-02-2019-0045 · DOI
  49. Kiani Mavi, 2021, Sustainability in construction projects: a systematic literature review, Sustainability, 13, 1932, 10.3390/su13041932 · DOI
  50. Kim, 2022, Improving sustainable project success strategies focused on cost and schedule for electrical construction project management, Sustainability, 14, 2653, 10.3390/su14052653 · DOI
  51. Kipper, 2020, Scopus scientific mapping production in industry 4.0 (2011–2018): a bibliometric analysis, Int. J. Prod. Res., 58, 1605, 10.1080/00207543.2019.1671625 · DOI
  52. Kjaerheim, 2005, Cleaner production and sustainability, J. Clean. Prod., 13, 329, 10.1016/S0959-6526(03)00119-7 · DOI
  53. Koke, 2019, Earned Green Value management for project management: a systematic review, J. Clean. Prod., 230, 180, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.079 · DOI
  54. Krour, 2022, Industrial-scale valorization of fine recycled aggregates in cement raw meal: towards sustainable mixtures, J. Clean. Prod., 362, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132231 · DOI
  55. Labuschagne, 2005, Sustainable Project Life Cycle Management: the need to integrate life cycles in the manufacturing sector, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 23, 159, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.06.003 · DOI
  56. Labuschagne, 2005, Environmental and social impact considerations for sustainable project life cycle management in the process industry, Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag., 12, 38, 10.1002/csr.76 · DOI
  57. Larsen, 1997, The concept of sustainable urban water management, Water Sci. Technol., 35, 10.2166/wst.1997.0326 · DOI
  58. Li, 2009, Urbanisation and its impact on building energy consumption and efficiency in China, Renew. Energy, 34, 1994, 10.1016/j.renene.2009.02.015 · DOI
  59. Lima, 2021, Sustainability in the construction industry: a systematic review of the literature, J. Clean. Prod., 289, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125730 · DOI
  60. López-Robles, 2019, 30 years of intelligence models in management and business: a bibliometric review, Int. J. Inf. Manag., 48, 22
  61. Mahmoudi, 2020, A novel model for risk management of outsourced construction projects using decision-making methods: a case study, Grey Syst. Theor. Appl., 10, 97, 10.1108/GS-09-2019-0038 · DOI
  62. Mahmoudi, 2021, Sustainable supplier selection in megaprojects: grey ordinal priority approach, Bus. Strat. Environ., 30, 318, 10.1002/bse.2623 · DOI
  63. Marcelino-Sádaba, 2015, Using project management as a way to sustainability. From a comprehensive review to a framework definition, J. Clean. Prod., 99, 1, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.020 · DOI
  64. Marnewick, 2022, Digitalization of project management: opportunities in research and practice, Project Leadership Soc., 3, 10.1016/j.plas.2022.100061 · DOI
  65. Martens, 2017, Key factors of sustainability in project management context: a survey exploring the project managers' perspective, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 35, 1084, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.04.004 · DOI
  66. Martins, 2019, Knowledge management in the context of sustainability: literature review and opportunities for future research, J. Clean. Prod., 229, 489, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.354 · DOI
  67. Moher, 2009, Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement, Ann. Intern. Med., 151, 264, 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 · DOI · Paper page
  68. Mongeon, 2016, The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis, Scientometrics, 106, 213, 10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Müller, 2018, What drives the implementation of Industry 4.0? The role of opportunities and challenges in the context of sustainability, Sustainability, 10, 10.3390/su10010247 · DOI
  70. Ng, 2022, The application of industry 4.0 technological constituents for sustainable manufacturing: a content-centric review, Sustainability, 14, 10.3390/su14074327 · DOI
  71. Nudurupati, 2022, Transforming sustainability of Indian small and medium-sized enterprises through circular economy adoption, J. Bus. Res., 149, 250, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.036 · DOI
  72. O'Dwyer, 2005, Assurance statement practice in environmental, social and sustainability reporting: a critical evaluation, Br. Account. Rev., 37, 205, 10.1016/j.bar.2005.01.005 · DOI
  73. Padilla-Lozano, 2022, Corporate social responsibility, green innovation and competitiveness – causality in manufacturing, Compet. Rev., 32, 21
  74. Palos-Sánchez, 2022, Artificial intelligence and human resources management: a bibliometric analysis, Appl. Artif. Intell., 36, 10.1080/08839514.2022.2145631 · DOI
  75. Palos-Sanchez, 2018, The effect of internet searches on afforestation: the case of a green search engine, Forests, 9, 51, 10.3390/f9020051 · DOI
  76. Peris-Mora, 2005, Development of a system of indicators for sustainable port management, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 50, 1649, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.06.048 · DOI
  77. Piyathanavong, 2022, Role of project management on Sustainable Supply Chain development through Industry 4.0 technologies and Circular Economy during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multiple case study of Thai metals industry, Operat. Manag. Res.
  78. Podgórska, 2022, Challenges and perspectives in innovative projects focused on sustainable industry 4.0—a case study on polish project teams, Sustainability, 14, 5334, 10.3390/su14095334 · DOI
  79. Quelhas, 2019, Engineering education and the development of competencies for sustainability, Int. J. Sustain. High Educ., 20, 614, 10.1108/IJSHE-07-2018-0125 · DOI
  80. Robichaud, 2011, Greening project management practices for sustainable construction, J. Manag. Eng., 27, 48
  81. Saeed, 2019, Promoting employee's proenvironmental behavior through green human resource management practices, Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag., 26, 424, 10.1002/csr.1694 · DOI
  82. Sánchez, 2015, Integrating sustainability issues into project management, J. Clean. Prod., 96, 319, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.087 · DOI
  83. Sankaran, 2021, The history and future of projects as a transition innovation: towards a sustainable project management framework, Syst. Res. Behav. Sci., 38, 696, 10.1002/sres.2814 · DOI
  84. Santana, 2020, What is the future of work? A science mapping analysis, Eur. Manag. J., 38, 846, 10.1016/j.emj.2020.04.010 · DOI
  85. Sarpin, 2021, Competency requirement for project manager in improving sustainable construction project success, Int. J. Sustain. Construct. Eng. Technol., 12, 10.30880/ijscet.2021.12.05.031 · DOI
  86. Schipper, 2018, Characteristics of smart sustainable city development: implications for project management, Smart Cities, 1, 75, 10.3390/smartcities1010005 · DOI
  87. Shooshtarian, 2022, Transformation towards a circular economy in the Australian construction and demolition waste management system, Sustain. Prod. Consum., 30, 89, 10.1016/j.spc.2021.11.032 · DOI
  88. Sigahi, 2023, Classical paradigms versus complexity thinking in engineering education: an essential discussion in the education for sustainable development, Int. J. Sustain. High Educ., 24, 179, 10.1108/IJSHE-11-2021-0472 · DOI
  89. Sigahi, 2022, Exploring applications of complexity theory in engineering education research: a systematic literature review, J. Eng. Educ., 111, 232, 10.1002/jee.20438 · DOI
  90. Sigahi, 2023, Which complexity? A review of typologies and a framework proposal for characterizing complexity-based approaches, Kybernetes
  91. Silvius, 2017, Sustainability as a new school of thought in project management, J. Clean. Prod., 166, 1479, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.121 · DOI · Paper page
  92. Silvius, 2020, Sustainability Impact Assessment on the project level; A review of available instruments, J. Modern Project Manag., 8, 240
  93. Stanitsas, 2023, Investigating the significance of sustainability indicators for promoting sustainable construction project management, Int. J. Construct. Manag., 23, 434, 10.1080/15623599.2021.1887718 · DOI
  94. Stanitsas, 2021, Integrating sustainability indicators into project management: the case of construction industry, J. Clean. Prod., 279, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123774 · DOI
  95. Tabassi, 2016, Leadership competences of sustainable construction project managers, J. Clean. Prod., 124, 339, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.076 · DOI · Paper page
  96. Thomé, 2016, Sustainable infrastructure: a review and a research agenda, J. Environ. Manag., 184, 143, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.080 · DOI
  97. Toledo, 2021, Is the incorporation of sustainability issues and Sustainable Development Goals in project management a catalyst for sustainable project delivery?, Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol., 28, 733, 10.1080/13504509.2021.1888816 · DOI
  98. Torres, 2018, The impact of knowledge management factors in organizational sustainable competitive advantage, J. Intellect. Cap., 19, 453, 10.1108/JIC-12-2016-0143 · DOI
  99. Trencher, 2014, University partnerships for co-designing and co-producing urban sustainability, Global Environ. Change, 28, 153, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.009 · DOI
  100. Uribe, 2018, What is going on with stakeholder theory in project management literature? A symbiotic relationship for sustainability, Sustainability, 10, 1300, 10.3390/su10041300 · DOI
  101. Verma, 2020, Investigating the emerging COVID-19 research trends in the field of business and management: a bibliometric analysis approach, J. Bus. Res., 118, 253, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.057 · DOI
  102. Vrchota, 2020, Critical success factors of the project management in relation to industry 4.0 for sustainability of projects, Sustainability, 13, 281, 10.3390/su13010281 · DOI
  103. Wang, 2021, The concept of sustainable construction project management in international practice, Environ. Dev. Sustain., 23, 16358, 10.1007/s10668-021-01333-z · DOI
  104. Wu, 2010, Project management and green buildings: lessons from the rating systems, J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 136, 64, 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000006 · DOI
  105. Xia, 2018, Conceptualising the state of the art of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the construction industry and its nexus to sustainable development, J. Clean. Prod., 195, 340, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.157 · DOI
  106. Yang, 2022, Review of agricultural water-saving policies and measures in recent years – a case study of Jiangsu Province, China, Water Supply, 22, 3951, 10.2166/ws.2022.026 · DOI
  107. Young, 2005, Towards sustainable land use: identifying and managing the conflicts between human activities and biodiversity conservation in Europe, Biodivers. Conserv., 14, 1641, 10.1007/s10531-004-0536-z · DOI
  108. Zeng, 2015, Social responsibility of major infrastructure projects in China, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 33, 537, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.07.007 · DOI
  109. Zupic, 2015, Bibliometric methods in management and organization, Organ. Res. Methods, 18, 429, 10.1177/1094428114562629 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gibbin, R. V., Sigahi, T. F. A. C., Pinto, J. D. S., Rampasso, I. S., & Anholon, R.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-08
Volume
414
Pages
137753
ISSN
0959-6526
DOI
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137753
Cited by
38
References
4
Language
en
Licence
Funders
CNPq

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review