Cited by 45Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsAcademic Publishing and Open AccessClinical practice guidelines implementation

Methodological challenges for living systematic reviews conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic: A concept paper

Open access
Iannizzi, Claire, Dorando, Elena, Burns, Jacob, Weibel, Stephanie, Dooley, Clare, Wakeford, Helen, Estcourt, Lise J, Skoetz, Nicole +1 more·2022·Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Abstract

Background A living systematic review (LSR) is an emerging review type that makes use of continual updating. In the COVID-19 pandemic, we were confronted with a shifting epidemiological landscape, clinical uncertainties and evolving evidence. These unexpected challenges compelled us to amend standard LSR methodology.Objective and outline Our primary objective is to discuss some challenges faced when conducting LSRs in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, and to provide methodological guidance for others doing similar work. Based on our experience and lessons learned from two Cochrane LSRs and challenges identified in several non-Cochrane LSRs, we highlight methodological considerations, particularly with regards to the study design, interventions and comparators, changes in outcome measure, and the search strategy. We discuss when to update, or rather when not to update the review, and the importance of transparency when reporting changes.Lessons learned and conclusion We learned that a LSR is a very suitable review type for the pandemic context, even in the face of new methodological and clinical challenges. Our experience showed that the decision for updating a LSR depends not only on the evolving disease or emerging evidence, but also on the individual review question and the review teams' resources.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.09.013

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For some covid-19 related LSRs, authors initially included non-randomised studies, but later excluded these studies and included clinical trials.

    “For example, for some covid-19 related LSRs, authors initially included non-randomised studies, but later excluded these studies and included clinical trials. 19”

    From Extension of the PRISMA 2020 statement for living systematic reviews (PRISMA-LSR): checklist and explanation (2024) · cites this paper as [19]

    In “Relevant design of studies? – a choice based on new conditions” (page unavailable), the paper says some COVID-19 LSRs included observational studies early because RCTs were scarce. It does not say those LSRs later excluded the observational studies and added clinical trials; for the authors’ own review, it instead describes a later decision to include additional safety data from controlled and uncontrolled studies. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Living systematic reviews face major challenges beyond adequate reporting, including the vast workload needed to maintain an LSR and publication platforms not being fit for purpose.

    “We acknowledge that LSRs face major challenges beyond adequate reporting, including the vast workload needed to maintain an LSR, 7 19 as well as the publication platforms not being fit for purpose.”

    From Extension of the PRISMA 2020 statement for living systematic reviews (PRISMA-LSR): checklist and explanation (2024) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Funding section says LSR updates depend on time and personnel, and the Developing the search strategy section describes the continuing work of maintaining searches. These passages support the workload challenge, but our copy does not say that publication platforms are not fit for purpose. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Most covid-19 related LSRs considered by a concept paper addressing methodological challenges for LSRs ran their search weekly or monthly.

    “Most covid-19 related LSRs considered by a concept paper addressing methodological challenges for LSRs ran their search weekly or monthly. 19”
  • A challenge reported for reviews conducted during the covid-19 pandemic was the dynamic nature of electronic databases.

    “A challenge reported for reviews conducted during the covid-19 pandemic was the dynamic nature of electronic databases. 19”
  • The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention covid-19 Research Articles Downloadable Database was discontinued in mid-2020, but was later completely covered by the World Health Organization covid-19 Global literature on coronavirus disease database.

    “For example, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention covid-19 Research Articles Downloadable Database, an early and comprehensive source of preprint articles, was discontinued in mid-2020, but was later completely covered by the World Health Organization covid-19 Global literature on coronavirus disease database. 19”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [25]Annals Information for Authors Annals of Internal Medicine 2021

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iannizzi, C., Dorando, E., Burns, J., Weibel, S., Dooley, C., Wakeford, H., Estcourt, L. J., Skoetz, N., & Piechotta, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Cologne (DE)
  • Institut für Medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie (DE)
  • Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (DE)
  • Cochrane (GB)
  • NHS Blood and Transplant (GB)
Corresponding author
Iannizzi, Claire
Venue
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
141
Pages
82-89
ISSN
0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3201287655
Cited by
45
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 11
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (COVID-19-RECPLAS)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01KX2021)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
living systematic review, COVID-19 pandemic, methodological issues
MeSH terms
Systematic Reviews as Topic, COVID-19, Humans, Research Design, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review