Cited by 13SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchVaccine Coverage and HesitancyCOVID-19 epidemiological studies

BNT162b2 vaccine effectiveness was marginally affected by the SARS-CoV-2 beta variant in fully vaccinated individuals

Open access
Mor, Orna, Zuckerman, Neta S., Hazan, Itay, Fluss, Ronen, Ash, Nachman, Ginish, Netanel, Mendelson, Ella, Alroy-Preis, Sharon +2 more·2022·Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of the Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine against the SARS-Cov-2 Beta variant.Study design and setting Israel's mass vaccination program, using two doses of the Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine, successfully curtailed the Alpha variant outbreak during winter 2020-2021, However, the virus may mutate and partially evade the immune system. To monitor this, sequencing of selected positive swab samples of interest was initiated. Comparing vaccinated with unvaccinated PCR positive persons, we estimated the odds ratio for a vaccinated case to have the Beta vs. the Alpha variant, using logistic regression, controlling for important confounders.Results There were 19 cases of Beta variant (3.2%) among those vaccinated more than 14 days before the positive sample and 79 (3.4%) among the unvaccinated. The estimated odds ratio was 1.26 (95% CI: 0.65-2.46). Assuming the effectiveness against the Alpha variant to be 95%, the estimated effectiveness against the Beta variant was 94% (95% CI: 88%-98%).Conclusion Despite concerns over the Beta variant, the BNT162b2 vaccine seemed to provide substantial immunity against both the Beta and the Alpha variants. From 14 days following the second vaccine dose, the effectiveness of BNT162b2 vaccine was at most marginally affected by the Beta variant.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.10.011

Cites

21 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mor, O., Zuckerman, N. S., Hazan, I., Fluss, R., Ash, N., Ginish, N., Mendelson, E., Alroy-Preis, S., Freedman, L., & Huppert, A.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • Sheba Medical Center (IL)
  • Israel Ministry of Health (IL)
Corresponding author
Huppert, Amit
Venue
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
142
Pages
38-44
ISSN
0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3210522245
Cited by
13
References
23
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Keywords
BNT162b2, COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness, SARS-CoV-2 Alpha variant, Omicron variant, vaccine breakthrough infection, immune evasion
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Vaccine Efficacy, BNT162 Vaccine, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Israel, Male, Middle Aged, RNA, Viral, Logistic Models, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Mass Vaccination, Microbial Viability, Young Adult, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review