Cited by 831SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

Waning of BNT162b2 Vaccine Protection against SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Qatar

Open access
Chemaitelly, Hiam, Tang, Patrick, Hasan, Mohammad R., AlMukdad, Sawsan, Yassine, Hadi M., Benslimane, Fatiha M., Al Khatib, Hebah A., Coyle, Peter +16 more·2021·New England Journal of Medicine

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Waning of vaccine protection against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection or coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is a concern. The persistence of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine effectiveness against infection and disease in Qatar, where the B.1.351 (or beta) and B.1.617.2 (or delta) variants have dominated incidence and polymerase-chain-reaction testing is done on a mass scale, is unclear. METHODS: We used a matched test-negative, case-control study design to estimate vaccine effectiveness against any SARS-CoV-2 infection and against any severe, critical, or fatal case of Covid-19, from January 1 to September 5, 2021. RESULTS: Estimated BNT162b2 effectiveness against any SARS-CoV-2 infection was negligible in the first 2 weeks after the first dose. It increased to 36.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 33.2 to 40.2) in the third week after the first dose and reached its peak at 77.5% (95% CI, 76.4 to 78.6) in the first month after the second dose. Effectiveness declined gradually thereafter, with the decline accelerating after the fourth month to reach approximately 20% in months 5 through 7 after the second dose. Effectiveness against symptomatic infection was higher than effectiveness against asymptomatic infection but waned similarly. Variant-specific effectiveness waned in the same pattern. Effectiveness against any severe, critical, or fatal case of Covid-19 increased rapidly to 66.1% (95% CI, 56.8 to 73.5) by the third week after the first dose and reached 96% or higher in the first 2 months after the second dose; effectiveness persisted at approximately this level for 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: BNT162b2-induced protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection appeared to wane rapidly following its peak after the second dose, but protection against hospitalization and death persisted at a robust level for 6 months after the second dose. (Funded by Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar and others.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa2114114

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Third-dose effectiveness may be declining faster than that of the second dose.

    “However, it seems that effectiveness could be declining faster than that of the second dose6,19.”

    From Waning effectiveness of the third dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (2022) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Results section reports that effectiveness against infection declined after the second dose, accelerating after the fourth month. It does not assess effectiveness after a third dose or compare the rates of decline, so it cannot support the claim that third-dose effectiveness may decline faster. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Additional vaccine effectiveness studies revealed waning of vaccine-induced protection over time.

    “However, as vaccination campaigns progressed, additional vaccine effectiveness (VE) studies revealed waning of the vaccine-induced protection over time [8-13]”
  • Matching on sex, age, nationality, and calendar week was previously shown to adequately control for differences in SARS-CoV-2 exposure risk in Qatar.

    “Matching according to these factors was previously shown to provide adequate control of differences in the risk of SARS-CoV-2 exposure in studies of different designs, all of which involved control groups, such as test-negative, case–control studies.”
  • The inclusion and exclusion criteria were implemented to allow immunity to build after vaccination and to reduce several potential biases.

    “These inclusion and exclusion criteria were implemented to allow for build-up of immunity after vaccination4,14 and to minimize different types of potential bias, as informed by earlier analyses in the same population.”
  • Matching was not possible for coexisting conditions, but matching on sex, age, and nationality provided demonstrable control of bias in earlier studies.

    “Although matching was performed according to sex, age, and nationality, matching was not possible for other factors, such as coexisting conditions. However, matching according to these factors provided demonstrable control of bias in our earlier studies.11,12,15,21,22”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. [4]4. Chemaitelly H, Yassine HM, Benslimane FM, et al. mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against the B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 variants and severe COVID-19 disease in Qatar. Nat Med 2021; 27: 1614- 1621. 34244681 10.1038/s41591-021-01446-y · DOI · Paper page
  2. [9]9. Benslimane FM, Al Khatib HA, Al-Jamal O, et al. One year of SARS-CoV-2: genomic characterization of COVID-19 outbreak in Qatar. May 20, 2021 (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.19.21257433v2). preprint. 10.3389/fcimb.2021.768883 PMC8637114 34869069 · DOI
  3. [10]10. Hasan MR, Kalikiri MKR, Mirza F, et al. Real-time SARS-CoV-2 genotyping by high-throughput multiplex PCR reveals the epidemiology of the variants of concern in Qatar. Int J Infect Dis 2021 September 12 (Epub ahead of print). 34525398 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.09.006 · DOI
  4. [11]11. Jackson ML, Nelson JC. The test-negative design for estimating influenza vaccine effectiveness. Vaccine 2013; 31: 2165- 2168. 23499601 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.02.053 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [14]14. Sheikh A, McMenamin J, Taylor B, Robertson C. SARS-CoV-2 Delta VOC in Scotland: demographics, risk of hospital admission, and vaccine effectiveness. Lancet 2021; 397: 2461- 2462. 34139198 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01358-1 PMC8201647 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [15]15. Nasreen S, He S, Chung H, et al. Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against variants of concern, Canada. July 3, 2021 (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.06.28.21259420v1). preprint. · DOI
  7. [18]18. Al-Thani MH, Farag E, Bertollini R, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection is at herd immunity in the majority segment of the population of Qatar. Open Forum Infect Dis 2021; 8(8): ofab221- ofab221. 34458388 10.1093/ofid/ofab221 PMC8135898 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [20]20. Coyle PV, Chemaitelly H, Ben Hadj Kacem MA, et al. SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in the urban population of Qatar: an analysis of antibody testing on a sample of 112,941 individuals. iScience 2021; 24: 102646- 102646. 34056566 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102646 PMC8142077 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [24]24. Jacoby P, Kelly H. Is it necessary to adjust for calendar time in a test negative design? Responding to: Jackson ML, Nelson JC. The test negative design for estimating influenza vaccine effectiveness. Vaccine 2013;31(April (17)):2165-8. Vaccine 2014; 32: 2942- 2942. 24016812 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.08.048 · DOI
  10. [25]25. Pearce N. Analysis of matched case-control studies. BMJ 2016; 352: i969- i969. 26916049 10.1136/bmj.i969 PMC4770817 · DOI
  11. [26]26. Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Modern epidemiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2008.
  12. [29]29. Abu-Raddad LJ, Chemaitelly H, Yassine HM, et al. Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA BNT162b2 Covid-19 vaccine protection against variants of concern after one versus two doses. J Travel Med 2021 May 28 (Epub ahead of print). 34050372 10.1093/jtm/taab083 PMC8194836 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [30]30. Tang P, Hasan MR, Chemaitelly H, et al. BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against the Delta (B.1.617.2) variant in Qatar. August 11, 2021 (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.11.21261885v1). preprint. 10.1038/s41591-021-01583-4 34728831 · DOI
  14. [32]32. Williams LR, Ferguson NM, Donnelly CA, Grassly NC. Measuring vaccine efficacy against infection and disease in clinical trials: sources and magnitude of bias in COVID-19 vaccine efficacy estimates. July 31, 2021 (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.30.21260912v1). preprint. 10.1093/cid/ciab914 PMC8586723 34698827 · DOI
  15. [33]33. Abu-Raddad LJ, Chemaitelly H, Ayoub HH, et al. Effect of vaccination and of prior infection on infectiousness of vaccine breakthrough infections and reinfections. July 30, 2021 (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.28.21261086v1). preprint. · DOI
  16. [34]34. Makhoul M, Ayoub HH, Chemaitelly H, et al. Epidemiological impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: mathematical modeling analyses. Vaccines (Basel) 2020; 8: 668- 668. 33182403 10.3390/vaccines8040668 PMC7712303 · DOI · Paper page
  17. [35]35. Usherwood T, LaJoie Z, Srivastava V. A model and predictions for COVID-19 considering population behavior and vaccination. Sci Rep 2021; 11: 12051- 12051. 34103618 10.1038/s41598-021-91514-7 PMC8187461 · DOI · Paper page
  18. [37]37. Cassell MM, Halperin DT, Shelton JD, Stanton D. Risk compensation: the Achilles’ heel of innovations in HIV prevention? BMJ 2006; 332: 605- 607. 16528088 10.1136/bmj.332.7541.605 PMC1397752 · DOI · Paper page
  19. [39]39. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED, Kitchin N, et al. Six month safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. July 28, 2021 (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.28.21261159v1). preprint. 10.1056/NEJMoa2110345 PMC8461570 34525277 · DOI
  20. [41]41. Pouwels KB, Pritchard E, Matthews PC, et al. Impact of Delta on viral burden and vaccine effectiveness against new SARS-CoV-2 infections in the UK. August 24, 2021 (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.18.21262237v1). preprint. 10.1038/s41591-021-01548-7 PMC8674129 34650248 · DOI
  21. [42]42. Keehner J, Horton LE, Binkin NJ, et al. Resurgence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a highly vaccinated health system workforce. N Engl J Med. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2112981. PMC8451183 34469645 · DOI
  22. [44]44. Nanduri S, Pilishvili T, Derado G, et al. Effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection among nursing home residents before and during widespread circulation of the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant — National Healthcare Safety Network, March 1–August 1, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021; 70: 1163- 1166. 34437519 10.15585/mmwr.mm7034e3 PMC8389386 · DOI
  23. [45]45. Rosenberg ES, Holtgrave DR, Dorabawila V, et al. New COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations among adults, by vaccination status — New York, May 3–July 25, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021; 70: 1150- 1155. 34437517 10.15585/mmwr.mm7034e1 PMC8389393 · DOI
  24. [46]46. Puranik A, Lenehan PJ, Silvert E, et al. Comparison of two highly-effective mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 during periods of Alpha and Delta variant prevalence. August 21, 2021 (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.06.21261707v3). preprint. · DOI
  25. [47]47. Flaxman A, Marchevsky NG, Jenkin D, et al. Reactogenicity and immunogenicity after a late second dose or a third dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 in the UK: a substudy of two randomised controlled trials (COV001 and COV002). Lancet 2021; 398: 981- 990. 34480858 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01699-8 PMC8409975 · DOI
  26. [49]49. Bertollini R, Chemaitelly H, Yassine HM, Al-Thani MH, Al-Khal A, Abu-Raddad LJ. Associations of vaccination and of prior infection with positive PCR test results for SARS-CoV-2 in airline passengers arriving in Qatar. JAMA 2021; 326: 185- 188. 34106201 10.1001/jama.2021.9970 PMC8190701 · DOI
  27. [50]50. Hitchings MDT, Ranzani OT, Scaramuzzini Torres MS, et al. Effectiveness of CoronaVac in the setting of high SARS-CoV-2 P.1 variant transmission in Brazil: a test-negative case-control study. April 7, 2021 (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.04.07.21255081v1). preprint. 10.1016/j.lana.2021.100025 PMC8310555 34386791 · DOI
  28. [51]51. Hunter PR, Brainard J. Estimating the effectiveness of the Pfizer COVID-19 BNT162b2 vaccine after a single dose: a reanalysis of a study of ‘real-world’ vaccination outcomes from Israel. February 3, 2021 (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.01.21250957v1). preprint. · DOI
  29. [53]53. Daum RS, Siber GR, Ballanco GA, Sood SK. Serum anticapsular antibody response in the first week after immunization of adults and infants with the Haemophilus influenzae type b-Neisseria meningitidis outer membrane protein complex conjugate vaccine. J Infect Dis 1991; 164: 1154- 1159. 1955715 10.1093/infdis/164.6.1154 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chemaitelly, H., Tang, P., Hasan, M. R., AlMukdad, S., Yassine, H. M., Benslimane, F. M., Al Khatib, H. A., Coyle, P., Ayoub, H. H., Al Kanaani, Z., Al Kuwari, E., Jeremijenko, A., Kaleeckal, A. H., Latif, A. N., Shaik, R. M., Abdul Rahim, H. F., Nasrallah, G. K., Al Kuwari, M. G., Al Romaihi, H. E., Butt, A. A., Al-Thani, M. H., Al Khal, A., Bertollini, R., & Abu-Raddad, L. J.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • From the Infectious Disease Epidemiology Group (H.C., S.A., L.J.A.-R.) and the World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Disease Epidemiology Analytics on HIV/AIDS, Sexually Transmitted Infections, and Viral Hepatitis (H.C., S.A., L.J.A.-R.), Weill Cornell Medicine–Qatar, Cornell University, Qatar Foundation–Education City, the Department of Pathology, Sidra Medicine (P.T., M.R.H.), the Biomedical Research Center, Member of QU Health (H.M.Y., F.M.B., H.A.A.K., P.C., G.K.N.), the Departments of Biomedical Science (H.M.Y., F.M.B., H.A.A.K., G.K.N.) and Public Health (H.F.A.R., L.J.A.-R.), College of Health Sciences, and the Mathematics Program, Department of Mathematics, Statistics, and Physics, College of Arts and Sciences (H.H.A.), Qatar University, Hamad Medical Corporation (P.C., Z.A.K., E.A.K., A.J., A.H.K., A.N.L., R.M.S., A.A.B., A.A.K.), Primary Health Care Corporation (M.G.A.K.), and the Ministry of Public Health (H.E.A.R., M.H.A.-T., R.B.) — all in Doha, Qatar; Wellcome–Wolfson Institute f...
Corresponding author
Abu-Raddad, Laith J.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2021-12-09
Volume
385
Issue
24
Pages
e83-e83
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W3203602168
Cited by
831
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 86 · 2023: 171 · 2022: 412 · 2021: 78 · 2013: 1
FWCI
59.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Qatar University QSpace (Qatar University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Biomedical Research Program and the Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Biomathematics Research Core at Weill Cornell Medicine–Qatar
  • Ministry of Public Health, Hamad Medical Corporation, and the Qatar Genome Programme
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Keywords
BNT162b2, COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, waning vaccine effectiveness, vaccine protection, B.1.351 variant, symptomatic infection, asymptomatic infection, severe COVID-19 outcomes, hospitalization, mortality, Qatar
MeSH terms
Immunogenicity, Vaccine, COVID-19, COVID-19 Vaccines, Vaccine Efficacy, BNT162 Vaccine, 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273, Breakthrough Infections, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Immunization, Secondary, Male, Middle Aged, Qatar, Time Factors, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review