PreprintCited by 543SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

Impact of Delta on viral burden and vaccine effectiveness against new SARS-CoV-2 infections in the UK

Open access
Pouwels, Koen B., Pritchard, Emma, Matthews, Philippa C., Stoesser, Nicole, Eyre, David W., Vihta, Karina-Doris, House, Thomas, Hay, Jodie +11 more·2021·Nature Medicine

Abstract

The effectiveness of BNT162b2, ChAdOx1, and mRNA-1273 vaccines against new SARS-CoV-2 infections requires continuous re-evaluation, given the increasingly dominant Delta variant. We investigated the effectiveness of the vaccines in a large community-based survey of randomly selected households across the UK. We found that the effectiveness of BNT162b2 and ChAd0x1 against any infections (new PCR positives) and infections with symptoms or high viral burden is reduced with the Delta variant. A single dose of the mRNA-1273 vaccine had similar or greater effectiveness compared to a single dose of BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1. Effectiveness of two doses remains at least as great as protection afforded by prior natural infection. The dynamics of immunity following second doses differed significantly between BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1, with greater initial effectiveness against new PCR-positives but faster declines in protection against high viral burden and symptomatic infection with BNT162b2. There was no evidence that effectiveness varied by dosing interval, but protection was higher among those vaccinated following a prior infection and younger adults. With Delta, infections occurring following two vaccinations had similar peak viral burden to those in unvaccinated individuals. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination still reduces new infections, but effectiveness and attenuation of peak viral burden are reduced with Delta.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.08.18.21262237

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A test-negative case-control design was used to estimate vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic Covid-19 caused by the omicron variant as compared with the delta variant in persons 18 years of age or older.

    “We used a test-negative case–control design to estimate vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic Covid-19 caused by the omicron variant as compared with the delta variant in persons 18 years of age or older.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [11]Israel, A. et al. Elapsed time since BNT162b2 vaccine and risk of SARSCoV-2 infection in a large cohort. Preprint at https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.03.21261496v1 (2021). PMC9083235 34819275 · DOI
  2. [14]Nasreen, S. et al. Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against variants of concern in Ontario, Canada. Preprint at https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.06.28.21259420v2 (2021). · DOI
  3. [25]Mlcochova, P. et al. SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 Delta variant replication, sensitivity to neutralising antibodies and vaccine breakthrough. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2021/06/28/2021.05.08.443253.full.pdf (2021).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pouwels, K. B., Pritchard, E., Matthews, P. C., Stoesser, N., Eyre, D. W., Vihta, K.-D., House, T., Hay, J., Bell, J. I., Newton, J. N., Farrar, J., Crook, D., Cook, D., Rourke, E., Studley, R., Peto, T., Diamond, I., Walker, A. S., & the COVID-19 Infection Survey Team
Affiliations
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB)
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Public Health England (GB)
  • Wellcome Trust (GB)
  • Office for National Statistics (GB)
Corresponding author
Pouwels, Koen B.
Venue
Nature Medicine
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-08-24
Volume
27
Issue
12
Pages
2127-2135
ISSN
1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3206181818
Cited by
543
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 289 · 2021: 93
FWCI
41.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (110,110z/15/Z, /Z/15/Z, 110110, NIHR200915)
  • Scottish Government
  • Llywodraeth Cymru
  • National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR200915)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0508-10279, NIHR200239, COVID-19, NIHR200915)
  • Department of Health and Social Care (COVID-19)
  • University of Oxford (NIHR200915)
  • Public Health England (NIHR200915)
  • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Huo Family Foundation
  • Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12023/22, NIHR200915, 110110/Z/15/Z, MC_UU_12023, COVID-19)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/V027468/1)
  • NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR200915)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, Delta variant, BNT162b2, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine, vaccine effectiveness, viral load, breakthrough infection, Alpha variant, waning immunity, dosing interval, household surveys, COVID-19 pandemic
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Vaccine Efficacy, BNT162 Vaccine, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, Adolescent, Adult, Antibodies, Viral, United Kingdom, Humans, Middle Aged, Vaccination, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Viral Load, Young Adult, Antibodies, Neutralizing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review