Cited by 399Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

Handling missing data in clinical research

Open access
Heymans, Martijn W., Twisk, Jos W.R.·2022·Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Abstract

Because missing data are present in almost every study, it is important to handle missing data properly. First of all, the missing data mechanism should be considered. Missing data can be either completely at random (MCAR), at random (MAR), or not at random (MNAR). When missing data are MCAR, a complete case analysis can be valid. Also when missing data are MAR, in some situations a complete case analysis leads to valid results. However, in most situations, missing data imputation should be used. Regarding imputation methods, it is highly advised to use multiple imputations because multiple imputations lead to valid estimates including the uncertainty about the imputed values. When missing data are MNAR, also multiple imputations do not lead to valid results. A complication hereby is that it not possible to distinguish whether missing data are MAR or MNAR. Finally, it should be realized that preventing to have missing data is always better than the treatment of missing data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.08.016

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Protocol authors have a choice between various methods for handling anticipated missing data, including imputing data, fitting a mixed effects model to repeated measures data, or omitting participants.

    “When planning to handle anticipated missing data, protocol authors have a choice between various methods, including imputing data, fitting a mixed effects model to repeated measures data, or omitting participants.428 429”
  • The mechanism resulting in missing data affects the risk of bias and decisions on how best to handle the missing data.

    “The mechanism resulting in missing data affects the risk of bias and decisions on how best to handle the missing data.428 429”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heymans, M. W., & Twisk, J. W. R.
Affiliations
Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
Corresponding author
Twisk, Jos W.R.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-11
Volume
151
Pages
185-188
ISSN
0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4296631245
Cited by
399
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 153 · 2025: 129 · 2024: 90 · 2023: 27
FWCI
45.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
missing data, missing data mechanisms, complete case analysis, multiple imputation, missing at random, missing not at random, clinical research, imputation uncertainty
MeSH terms
Humans, Uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review