Cited by 82Cardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsUltrasound in Clinical Applications

A randomized trial of pocket-echocardiography integrated mobile health device assessments in modern structural heart disease clinics

Open access
Bhavnani, Sanjeev P., Sola, Srikanth, Adams, David, Venkateshvaran, Ashwin, Dash, P.K., Sengupta, Partho P., Bhavnani, Sanjeev, Sola, Srikanth +65 more·2018·JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging

Abstract

Objectives This study sought to determine whether mobile health (mHealth) device assessments used as clinical decision support tools at the point-of-care can reduce the time to treatment and improve long-term outcomes among patients with rheumatic and structural heart diseases (SHD).Background Newly developed smartphone-connected mHealth devices represent promising methods to diagnose common diseases in resource-limited areas; however, the impact of technology-based care on long-term outcomes has not been rigorously evaluated.Methods A total of 253 patients with SHD were randomized to an initial diagnostic assessment with wireless devices in mHealth clinics (n = 139) or to standard-care (n = 114) in India. mHealth clinics were equipped with point-of-care devices including pocket-echocardiography, smartphone-connected-electrocardiogram blood pressure and oxygen measurements, activity monitoring, and portable brain natriuretic peptide laboratory testing. All individuals underwent comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography to assess the severity of SHD. The primary endpoint was the time to referral for therapy with percutaneous valvuloplasty or surgical valve replacement. Secondary endpoints included the probability of a cardiovascular hospitalization and/or death over 1 year.Results An initial mHealth assessment was associated with a shorter time to referral for valvuloplasty and/or valve replacement (83 ± 79 days vs. 180 ± 101 days; p <0.001) and was associated with an increased probability for valvuloplasty/valve replacement compared to standard-care (34% vs. 32%; adjusted hazard ratio: 1.54; 95% CI: 0.96 to 2.47; p = 0.07). Patients randomized to mHealth were associated with a lower risk of a hospitalization and/or death on follow-up (15% vs. 28%, adjusted hazard ratio: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.83; p = 0.013).Conclusions An initial mHealth diagnostic strategy was associated with a shorter time to definitive therapy among patients with SHD in a resource-limited area and was associated with improved outcomes. (A Randomized Trial of Pocket-Echocardiography Integrated Mobile Health Device Assessments in Modern Structural Heart Disease Clinics; NCT02881398).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.06.019

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tele-ultrasound has demonstrated success in producing high quality, diagnostically significant images.

    “Tele-ultrasound has demonstrated success in producing high quality, diagnostically significant images which alter management, decrease time to treatment, and provide more cost-effective care, especially when coupled with supporting data such as electrocardiogram, chest radiography, laboratory results, and clinical history (29, 30, 33, 35, 37, 48).”

    From Tele-Ultrasound in Resource-Limited Settings: A Systematic Review (2019) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Initial Testing passage reports that 96% of pocket-echocardiographic studies had good or excellent image quality and adequate diagnostic correlation with transthoracic echocardiography for moderate or severe valve disease. The Pocket Echocardiography methods passage describes scans performed and interpreted by local physicians, not remotely transmitted or interpreted tele-ultrasound; that aspect of the claim is not established. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Tele-ultrasound alters management.

    “Tele-ultrasound has demonstrated success in producing high quality, diagnostically significant images which alter management, decrease time to treatment, and provide more cost-effective care, especially when coupled with supporting data such as electrocardiogram, chest radiography, laboratory results, and clinical history (29, 30, 33, 35, 37, 48).”

    From Tele-Ultrasound in Resource-Limited Settings: A Systematic Review (2019) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Study Limitations passage says clinicians used pocket-ultrasound findings, alongside other mHealth data, to make treatment and referral decisions. The conclusion reports shorter referral times with the combined mHealth strategy. But the paper describes scans performed and interpreted by local physicians, not tele-ultrasound, and does not isolate ultrasound’s effect on management. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Tele-ultrasound provides more cost-effective care.

    “Tele-ultrasound has demonstrated success in producing high quality, diagnostically significant images which alter management, decrease time to treatment, and provide more cost-effective care, especially when coupled with supporting data such as electrocardiogram, chest radiography, laboratory results, and clinical history (29, 30, 33, 35, 37, 48).”

    From Tele-Ultrasound in Resource-Limited Settings: A Systematic Review (2019) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Abstract describes lower cost as a design feature of mobile-health devices, and the Primary Endpoints section reports faster treatment referral and fewer hospitalizations or deaths. It does not report a cost-effectiveness analysis or demonstrate that care was more cost-effective; the trial also assessed a package of point-of-care devices, not tele-ultrasound alone. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In Bangalore, India, tele-ultrasound reduced the time to referral for valvular interventions and reduced the likelihood of both hospitalization and death among children with structural heart disease.

    “Tele-ultrasound reduced the time to referral for valvular interventions and reduced the likelihood of both hospitalization and death (30).”

    From Tele-Ultrasound in Resource-Limited Settings: A Systematic Review (2019) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Abstract and Primary Endpoints report a shorter time to referral for valvuloplasty or valve replacement and a lower combined risk of cardiovascular hospitalization and/or death with the mHealth assessment. The study was conducted in Bangalore, but the cited results concern patients with structural heart disease generally, not specifically children. It also reports hospitalization and death as a combined outcome, rather than demonstrating reductions in each separately. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Tele-ultrasound decreases time to treatment.

    “Tele-ultrasound has demonstrated success in producing high quality, diagnostically significant images which alter management, decrease time to treatment, and provide more cost-effective care, especially when coupled with supporting data such as electrocardiogram, chest radiography, laboratory results, and clinical history (29, 30, 33, 35, 37, 48).”

    From Tele-Ultrasound in Resource-Limited Settings: A Systematic Review (2019) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Primary Endpoints section reports a shorter time to treatment with the mHealth assessment than with standard care. But the Study Procedures describe local, point-of-care pocket echocardiography as one part of a multi-device assessment, not tele-ultrasound; the result cannot be attributed specifically to tele-ultrasound. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [14]14. Maisel A, Barnard D, Jaski B, et al. Primary results of the HABIT trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61:1726-35.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhavnani, S. P., Sola, S., Adams, D., Venkateshvaran, A., Dash, P. K., Sengupta, P. P., Bhavnani, S., Sola, S., Venkateshvaran, A., Adams, D., Sengupta, P. P., Ryan, T., Narula, J., Thomas, J., Lang, R., Pellikka, P., Choudhary, V., Iyer, V. R., Barooah, B., Sola, S., Varyani, R., Lingan, A., Murugan, V., Kini, P., Venkateshvaran, A., Srinivas, N., Barooah, A. C., Subbarao, G. V. R., Shivakumar, C., Subramaniyan, M., Sengupta, S. P., Bansal, M., Rahaman, A., Patil, V. N., Kumar, N. R., Gahlot, M. Y., Damani, I. M., Gulati, R., Joshi, S. S., Dubey, S., Krupa, J., Irfan, S., Vidhyakar, R. B., Bidarkar, N., Shantesh, B. K., Chavan, S. S., Chandramohan, R., Kumar, V., Tirkey, S., Prasad, G., Lakshmana, S. S., Malkar, R. M., Manjunath, V., Kumar Reddy, K., Ramesha, L. G., Kumbhalkar, S., Thadlani, J. A., Basha, T. M. N., Hafeez, S. A., Leelavathi, V., Mathews, R., Daubert, M., Cleve, J., Burdulis, E., Fauss, N., Lammertin, G., Patel, B., Petrovets, E., Shah, D., Thurmond, K., Tomberlin, D., Umamaheswar, H., & Kadakia, A.
Affiliations
Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Medical Sciences (IN)
Venue
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-04
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
546-557
ISSN
  • 1876-7591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-878X
OpenAlex
W2764038962
Cited by
81
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3
FWCI
4.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JACC. Cardiovascular imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
Keywords
structural heart disease, mobile health, point-of-care testing, clinical decision support, valvuloplasty, valve replacement, time to treatment, cardiovascular hospitalization, mortality, resource-limited settings, brain natriuretic peptide, rheumatic heart disease
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Adult, Blood Pressure Determination, Electrocardiography, Equipment Design, Female, Heart Valve Diseases, Humans, India, Male, Middle Aged, Oximetry, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Referral and Consultation, Rheumatic Heart Disease, Severity of Illness Index, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Time Factors, United States, Treatment Outcome, Telemedicine, Echocardiography, Doppler, Color, Point-of-Care Systems, Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation, Young Adult, Actigraphy, Wireless Technology, Time-to-Treatment, Balloon Valvuloplasty, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review