CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2463D Printing in Biomedical ResearchPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enhanced Utilization of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell–Derived Human Intestinal Organoids Using Microengineered Chips

Open access
Workman, Michael J., Gleeson, John P., Troisi, Elissa J., Estrada, Hannah Q., Kerns, S. Jordan, Hinojosa, Christopher D., Hamilton, Geraldine A., Targan, Stephan R., Svendsen, Clive N., Barrett, Robert J.·2018·Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
DOI 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2017.12.008PMC PMC6009013
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Background and Aims Human intestinal organoids derived from induced pluripotent stem cells have tremendous potential to elucidate the intestinal epithelium's role in health and disease, but it is difficult to directly assay these complex structures. This study sought to make this technology more amenable for study by obtaining epithelial cells from induced pluripotent stem cell–derived human intestinal organoids and incorporating them into small microengineered Chips. We then investigated if these cells within the Chip were polarized, had the 4 major intestinal epithelial subtypes, and were biologically responsive to exogenous stimuli. Methods Epithelial cells were positively selected from human intestinal organoids and were incorporated into the Chip. The effect of continuous media flow was examined. Immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization were used to demonstrate that the epithelial cells were polarized and possessed the major intestinal epithelial subtypes. To assess if the incorporated cells were biologically responsive, Western blot analysis and quantitative polymerase chain reaction were used to assess the effects of interferon (IFN)-γ, and fluorescein isothiocyanate–dextran 4 kDa permeation was used to assess the effects of IFN-γ and tumor necrosis factor-α on barrier function. Results The optimal cell seeding density and flow rate were established. The continuous administration of flow resulted in the formation of polarized intestinal folds that contained Paneth cells, goblet cells, enterocytes, and enteroendocrine cells along with transit-amplifying and LGR5 + stem cells. Administration of IFN-γ for 1 hour resulted in the phosphorylation of STAT1, whereas exposure for 3 days resulted in a significant upregulation of IFN-γ related genes. Administration of IFN-γ and tumor necrosis factor-α for 3 days resulted in an increase in intestinal permeability. Conclusions We demonstrate that the Intestine-Chip is polarized, contains all the intestinal epithelial subtypes, and is biologically responsive to exogenous stimuli. This represents a more amenable platform to use organoid technology and will be highly applicable to personalized medicine and a wide range of gastrointestinal conditions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2017.12.008

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Graphical abstract
Graphical abstract CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 1 (A) Schematic of workflow for incorporation of iPSC-derived HIOs into the Intestine-Chip. Scale bar = 200 μm. (B) Representative images showing polarized HIOs immunopositive for E-cadherin (red) and ZO-1 (green), and HIOs immunopositive for E-cadherin/CDH1 (red), CDX2 (gray), and vimentin (green) all counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 50 μm. (C) Schematic of the small microengineered Chip used in this study. (D) HIO-epithelial cells ranging in concentrations from 2.5–7.5 × 106 cells/mL were seeded into the Chip and representative phase contrast images were obtained after 24 hours. Yellow lines denote areas of the Chip not covered by HIO-derived epithelial cells. Scale bar = 200 μm. (E) HIO-epithelial cells were seeded at 6.25 × 106 cells/mL into the Intestine-Chip and E-cadherin/CDH1+ cells (red) counterstained with DAPI (blue) were imaged 3 days later. Images were stitched together to show a fully confluent monolayer of intestinal epithelial cells along the entire channel of the Chip. Scale bar = 1 mm.
Figure 1 (A) Schematic of workflow for incorporation of iPSC-derived HIOs into the Intestine-Chip. Scale bar = 200 μm. (B) Representative images showing polarized HIOs immunopositive for E-cadherin (red) and ZO-1 (green), and HIOs immunopositive for E-cadherin/CDH1 (red), CDX2 (gray), and vimentin (green) all counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 50 μm. (C) Schematic of the small microengineered Chip used in this study. (D) HIO-epithelial cells ranging in concentrations from 2.5–7.5 × 106 cells/mL were seeded into the Chip and representative phase contrast images were obtained after 24 hours. Yellow lines denote areas of the Chip not covered by HIO-derived epithelial cells. Scale bar = 200 μm. (E) HIO-epithelial cells were seeded at 6.25 × 106 cells/mL into the Intestine-Chip and E-cadherin/CDH1+ cells (red) counterstained with DAPI (blue) were imaged 3 days later. Images were stitched together to show a fully confluent monolayer of intestinal epithelial cells along the entire channel of the Chip. Scale bar = 1 mm.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 2 (A) Representative phase contrast image of HIO-derived epithelial cells seeded into the Chip. Cells were exposed to continuous media flow at 30 μL/h and imaged after 0, 3, 5, and 7 days. Static Chip was imaged after 7 days. Scale bar = 200 μm. (B) Stitched phase contrast image of HIO-epithelial cells that were exposed to continual media flow at 30 μL/h for 5 days. Scale bar = 1 mm. (C) Representative brightfield image of cross-section of Chip that was exposed to continual media flow at 30 μL/h for 14 days. Scale bar = 250 μm. Representative fluorescent images showing (D) E-cadherin/CDH1 (red), ZO-1 (green), DAPI (blue), and (E) E-cadherin (blue), CDX2 (red), and Villin (green), in cross-section of Chip under conditions similar to C. Both scale bars = 50 μm. (F) Representative fluorescent images showing E-cadherin/CDH1 (red), and MUC2, lysozyme, FABP2, and chromogranin A (all green), counterstained with DAPI (blue), in cross-section of Chips that were exposed to continual media flow at 30 μL/h for 7 days. Scale bar = 10 μm. (G) Representative images of in situ hybridization for LGR5+ and WDR43+ (white arrows) in conditions similar to F. Scale bar = 10 μm. (H) Representative fluorescent image showing E-cadherin/CDH1 (blue), Ki67 (green), and DAPI (blue) in conditions similar to F. Scale bar = 100 μm. Graph shows percent Ki67+ nuclei per section.
Figure 2 (A) Representative phase contrast image of HIO-derived epithelial cells seeded into the Chip. Cells were exposed to continuous media flow at 30 μL/h and imaged after 0, 3, 5, and 7 days. Static Chip was imaged after 7 days. Scale bar = 200 μm. (B) Stitched phase contrast image of HIO-epithelial cells that were exposed to continual media flow at 30 μL/h for 5 days. Scale bar = 1 mm. (C) Representative brightfield image of cross-section of Chip that was exposed to continual media flow at 30 μL/h for 14 days. Scale bar = 250 μm. Representative fluorescent images showing (D) E-cadherin/CDH1 (red), ZO-1 (green), DAPI (blue), and (E) E-cadherin (blue), CDX2 (red), and Villin (green), in cross-section of Chip under conditions similar to C. Both scale bars = 50 μm. (F) Representative fluorescent images showing E-cadherin/CDH1 (red), and MUC2, lysozyme, FABP2, and chromogranin A (all green), counterstained with DAPI (blue), in cross-section of Chips that were exposed to continual media flow at 30 μL/h for 7 days. Scale bar = 10 μm. (G) Representative images of in situ hybridization for LGR5+ and WDR43+ (white arrows) in conditions similar to F. Scale bar = 10 μm. (H) Representative fluorescent image showing E-cadherin/CDH1 (blue), Ki67 (green), and DAPI (blue) in conditions similar to F. Scale bar = 100 μm. Graph shows percent Ki67+ nuclei per section.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 3 (A) Western blot analyses and quantification of phosphorylation of STAT1 in Chips containing either HIO-derived intestinal epithelial or Caco2 cells in response to exposure of increasing concentrations (0–1000 ng/mL) of IFN-γ in the lower channel for 1 hour. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and STAT1 were used as loading controls. Image J analysis was used to quantify levels of phospho-STAT1 compared with glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. (B) Quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction analyses of IDO1 and GBP1 and (C) PLA2G2A, MUC4, and LYZ in Chips incorporating either HIO-derived epithelial or Caco-2 cells in response to exposure of 10 ng/mL of IFN-γ in the lower channel for 3 days. Three independent experiments were carried out; data represent mean ± SEM; *P < .05, **P < .01 compared with respective untreated controls. (D) Area under the curve of fluorescein isothiocyanate–dextran 4 kDa permeation over 6 hours was statistically higher (P < .01) in Intestine-Chip treated with IFN-γ and TNF-α compared with untreated. (E) Following the permeability studies, MTS cytotoxicity assay was carried out and showed no statistical difference between Intestine-Chips treated with IFN-γ and TNF-α or untreated. Two independent experiments were carried out; data represent mean ± SEM. **P < .01. AUC, area under the curve; CTL, control; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.
Figure 3 (A) Western blot analyses and quantification of phosphorylation of STAT1 in Chips containing either HIO-derived intestinal epithelial or Caco2 cells in response to exposure of increasing concentrations (0–1000 ng/mL) of IFN-γ in the lower channel for 1 hour. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and STAT1 were used as loading controls. Image J analysis was used to quantify levels of phospho-STAT1 compared with glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. (B) Quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction analyses of IDO1 and GBP1 and (C) PLA2G2A, MUC4, and LYZ in Chips incorporating either HIO-derived epithelial or Caco-2 cells in response to exposure of 10 ng/mL of IFN-γ in the lower channel for 3 days. Three independent experiments were carried out; data represent mean ± SEM; *P < .05, **P < .01 compared with respective untreated controls. (D) Area under the curve of fluorescein isothiocyanate–dextran 4 kDa permeation over 6 hours was statistically higher (P < .01) in Intestine-Chip treated with IFN-γ and TNF-α compared with untreated. (E) Following the permeability studies, MTS cytotoxicity assay was carried out and showed no statistical difference between Intestine-Chips treated with IFN-γ and TNF-α or untreated. Two independent experiments were carried out; data represent mean ± SEM. **P < .01. AUC, area under the curve; CTL, control; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Supplementary Figure 1 (A) Phase contrast image (scale bar = 500 μm) and (B) fluorescent image (scale bar = 100 μm) showing E-cadherin/CDH1 (green), CDX2 (red), counterstained with DAPI (blue) of intact HIO that was incorporated into the Chip and imaged 3 days later. (C) Phase contrast image showing epithelial and mesenchymal cells that arose from intact HIOs that were incorporated into the Chip and imaged 4 days later. Yellow dotted lines represent mesenchymal cells in Chip. Scale bar = 500 μm.
Supplementary Figure 1 (A) Phase contrast image (scale bar = 500 μm) and (B) fluorescent image (scale bar = 100 μm) showing E-cadherin/CDH1 (green), CDX2 (red), counterstained with DAPI (blue) of intact HIO that was incorporated into the Chip and imaged 3 days later. (C) Phase contrast image showing epithelial and mesenchymal cells that arose from intact HIOs that were incorporated into the Chip and imaged 4 days later. Yellow dotted lines represent mesenchymal cells in Chip. Scale bar = 500 μm.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Supplementary Figure 2 Representative phase contrast images of HIO-derived epithelial cells seeded into the chip. Cells were exposed to continuous media flow of 60 μL/h and imaged after 0, 3, 5, and 7 days. Scale bar = 200 μm.
Supplementary Figure 2 Representative phase contrast images of HIO-derived epithelial cells seeded into the chip. Cells were exposed to continuous media flow of 60 μL/h and imaged after 0, 3, 5, and 7 days. Scale bar = 200 μm.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Supplementary Figure 3 Representative fluorescent images showing E-cadherin (gray), CDX2 (red), and MUC2, lysozyme, FABP2, and chromogranin A (all green) in cross-section of Chips incorporating Caco-2 cells that were exposed to continual media flow of 30 μL/h and imaged after 8 days. Scale bar = 50 μm.
Supplementary Figure 3 Representative fluorescent images showing E-cadherin (gray), CDX2 (red), and MUC2, lysozyme, FABP2, and chromogranin A (all green) in cross-section of Chips incorporating Caco-2 cells that were exposed to continual media flow of 30 μL/h and imaged after 8 days. Scale bar = 50 μm.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Workman, M. J., Gleeson, J. P., Troisi, E. J., Estrada, H. Q., Kerns, S. J., Hinojosa, C. D., Hamilton, G. A., Targan, S. R., Svendsen, C. N., & Barrett, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
  • Emulate (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Barrett, Robert J.
ORCID
Venue
Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
669-677.e2
ISSN
2352-345X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jcmgh.2017.12.008
PMC
PMC6009013
OpenAlex
W2780753528
Cited by
246
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 13
FWCI
11.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R56DK106202-01)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Keywords
intestinal organoids, induced pluripotent stem cells, Paneth cells, goblet cells, enterocytes, enteroendocrine cells, Lgr5+ stem cells, interferon-gamma, TNF-α, STAT1 phosphorylation, intestinal permeability, barrier function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review